Quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiation with once‐a‐week versus once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin

Abstract Introduction This trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of low dose once‐a‐week cisplatin and once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin with radiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). The current analysis focuses on the quality of life (QoL) of patients in this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nandini S. Menon, Vanita Noronha, Vijay Maruti Patil, Amit Joshi, Atanu Bhattacharjee, Devanshi Kalra, Sarbani Ghosh Laskar, Vijayalakshmi Mathrudev, Kavita Nawale, Arati S. Bhelekar, Kumar Prabhash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-11-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4715
_version_ 1811243548681437184
author Nandini S. Menon
Vanita Noronha
Vijay Maruti Patil
Amit Joshi
Atanu Bhattacharjee
Devanshi Kalra
Sarbani Ghosh Laskar
Vijayalakshmi Mathrudev
Kavita Nawale
Arati S. Bhelekar
Kumar Prabhash
author_facet Nandini S. Menon
Vanita Noronha
Vijay Maruti Patil
Amit Joshi
Atanu Bhattacharjee
Devanshi Kalra
Sarbani Ghosh Laskar
Vijayalakshmi Mathrudev
Kavita Nawale
Arati S. Bhelekar
Kumar Prabhash
author_sort Nandini S. Menon
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction This trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of low dose once‐a‐week cisplatin and once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin with radiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). The current analysis focuses on the quality of life (QoL) of patients in this trial. Methods In this phase III randomized trial, patients with nonmetastatic LAHNSCC were randomized to receive cisplatin 30 mg/m2 once‐a‐week or 100 mg/m2 once every‐ 3‐weeks concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was locoregional control. QoL was a key secondary endpoint. QoL was assessed using EORTC QLQ‐C30 and QLQ‐H&N35. QoL data were assessed at baseline, days 22 and 43 during treatment; and at 6, 12, 24 months. The linear mixed‐effects model was used for longitudinal analysis of QoL to determine the impact of treatment (arm) and time on QoL. Results Three hundred patients were enrolled, data of 150 patients with available baseline QoL were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the global health status/QoL of the two treatment arms (p = 0.8664). There was no significant difference in the longitudinal QoL scores between the two treatment arms in all scales except constipation (p = 0.0096), less sexuality (p = 0.0002,), and financial difficulty (p = 0.0219). There was a worsening of the QoL scores in all scales in both arms during treatment, which improved after treatment completion in most scales. Conclusion The use of once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin did not adversely impact QoL as compared to once‐a‐week cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy in LAHNSCC.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T14:10:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f7c8e79620cf42e8aa6c71b27c061838
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T14:10:24Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-f7c8e79620cf42e8aa6c71b27c0618382022-12-22T03:29:56ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342022-11-0111213939394810.1002/cam4.4715Quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiation with once‐a‐week versus once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatinNandini S. Menon0Vanita Noronha1Vijay Maruti Patil2Amit Joshi3Atanu Bhattacharjee4Devanshi Kalra5Sarbani Ghosh Laskar6Vijayalakshmi Mathrudev7Kavita Nawale8Arati S. Bhelekar9Kumar Prabhash10Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai IndiaSection of Biostatistics, Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer Navi Mumbai IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai IndiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai IndiaAbstract Introduction This trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of low dose once‐a‐week cisplatin and once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin with radiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). The current analysis focuses on the quality of life (QoL) of patients in this trial. Methods In this phase III randomized trial, patients with nonmetastatic LAHNSCC were randomized to receive cisplatin 30 mg/m2 once‐a‐week or 100 mg/m2 once every‐ 3‐weeks concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was locoregional control. QoL was a key secondary endpoint. QoL was assessed using EORTC QLQ‐C30 and QLQ‐H&N35. QoL data were assessed at baseline, days 22 and 43 during treatment; and at 6, 12, 24 months. The linear mixed‐effects model was used for longitudinal analysis of QoL to determine the impact of treatment (arm) and time on QoL. Results Three hundred patients were enrolled, data of 150 patients with available baseline QoL were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the global health status/QoL of the two treatment arms (p = 0.8664). There was no significant difference in the longitudinal QoL scores between the two treatment arms in all scales except constipation (p = 0.0096), less sexuality (p = 0.0002,), and financial difficulty (p = 0.0219). There was a worsening of the QoL scores in all scales in both arms during treatment, which improved after treatment completion in most scales. Conclusion The use of once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin did not adversely impact QoL as compared to once‐a‐week cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy in LAHNSCC.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4715chemoradiationcisplatinhead and neck cancerquality of life
spellingShingle Nandini S. Menon
Vanita Noronha
Vijay Maruti Patil
Amit Joshi
Atanu Bhattacharjee
Devanshi Kalra
Sarbani Ghosh Laskar
Vijayalakshmi Mathrudev
Kavita Nawale
Arati S. Bhelekar
Kumar Prabhash
Quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiation with once‐a‐week versus once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin
Cancer Medicine
chemoradiation
cisplatin
head and neck cancer
quality of life
title Quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiation with once‐a‐week versus once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin
title_full Quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiation with once‐a‐week versus once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin
title_fullStr Quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiation with once‐a‐week versus once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin
title_full_unstemmed Quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiation with once‐a‐week versus once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin
title_short Quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiation with once‐a‐week versus once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin
title_sort quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiation with once a week versus once every 3 weeks cisplatin
topic chemoradiation
cisplatin
head and neck cancer
quality of life
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4715
work_keys_str_mv AT nandinismenon qualityoflifeinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaundergoingconcurrentchemoradiationwithonceaweekversusonceevery3weekscisplatin
AT vanitanoronha qualityoflifeinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaundergoingconcurrentchemoradiationwithonceaweekversusonceevery3weekscisplatin
AT vijaymarutipatil qualityoflifeinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaundergoingconcurrentchemoradiationwithonceaweekversusonceevery3weekscisplatin
AT amitjoshi qualityoflifeinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaundergoingconcurrentchemoradiationwithonceaweekversusonceevery3weekscisplatin
AT atanubhattacharjee qualityoflifeinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaundergoingconcurrentchemoradiationwithonceaweekversusonceevery3weekscisplatin
AT devanshikalra qualityoflifeinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaundergoingconcurrentchemoradiationwithonceaweekversusonceevery3weekscisplatin
AT sarbanighoshlaskar qualityoflifeinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaundergoingconcurrentchemoradiationwithonceaweekversusonceevery3weekscisplatin
AT vijayalakshmimathrudev qualityoflifeinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaundergoingconcurrentchemoradiationwithonceaweekversusonceevery3weekscisplatin
AT kavitanawale qualityoflifeinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaundergoingconcurrentchemoradiationwithonceaweekversusonceevery3weekscisplatin
AT aratisbhelekar qualityoflifeinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaundergoingconcurrentchemoradiationwithonceaweekversusonceevery3weekscisplatin
AT kumarprabhash qualityoflifeinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaundergoingconcurrentchemoradiationwithonceaweekversusonceevery3weekscisplatin