Distraction and Expressive Suppression Strategies in Regulation of High- and Low-Intensity Negative Emotions

Abstract The current study compared the effectiveness of distraction, an antecedent-focused strategy that involves diverting an individual’s attention away from affective terms, and expressive suppression, a response-focused strategy that involves inhibiting conscious emotion-expressive behavior dur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ping Li, Wei Wang, Cong Fan, Chuanlin Zhu, Shuaixia Li, Zhao Zhang, Zhengyang Qi, Wenbo Luo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2017-10-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12983-3
_version_ 1830282863616983040
author Ping Li
Wei Wang
Cong Fan
Chuanlin Zhu
Shuaixia Li
Zhao Zhang
Zhengyang Qi
Wenbo Luo
author_facet Ping Li
Wei Wang
Cong Fan
Chuanlin Zhu
Shuaixia Li
Zhao Zhang
Zhengyang Qi
Wenbo Luo
author_sort Ping Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The current study compared the effectiveness of distraction, an antecedent-focused strategy that involves diverting an individual’s attention away from affective terms, and expressive suppression, a response-focused strategy that involves inhibiting conscious emotion-expressive behavior during an emotionally aroused state, in the regulation of high- and low-intensity unpleasant stimuli, using event-related potentials (ERPs). Sixteen participants completed an emotion regulation experiment in which they passively viewed high- or low-intensity unpleasant images (view), solved a mathematical equation presented on high- or low-intensity negative images (distraction), or suppressed their emotional expression in response to high- or low-intensity unpleasant images (suppression). Their negative experiences after implementation of these strategies were rated by participants on a 1–9 scale. We mainly found that compared with expressive suppression, distraction yielded greater attenuation of the early phase of centro-parietal LPP when the participants responded to high-intensity stimuli. In the low-intensity condition, distraction, but not expressive suppression, effectively decreased the early phase of LPP. The findings suggest that expressive suppression works as early as distraction in the high-intensity condition; more importantly, distraction is superior to expressive suppression in regulating negative emotion, which is influenced by emotional intensity.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T02:46:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f7ca12cbcfc84b35a4057d3871543376
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T02:46:21Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-f7ca12cbcfc84b35a4057d38715433762022-12-21T20:38:52ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222017-10-01711810.1038/s41598-017-12983-3Distraction and Expressive Suppression Strategies in Regulation of High- and Low-Intensity Negative EmotionsPing Li0Wei Wang1Cong Fan2Chuanlin Zhu3Shuaixia Li4Zhao Zhang5Zhengyang Qi6Wenbo Luo7Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal UniversityResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal UniversityResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal UniversityResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal UniversityResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal UniversityResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal UniversityResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal UniversityResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal UniversityAbstract The current study compared the effectiveness of distraction, an antecedent-focused strategy that involves diverting an individual’s attention away from affective terms, and expressive suppression, a response-focused strategy that involves inhibiting conscious emotion-expressive behavior during an emotionally aroused state, in the regulation of high- and low-intensity unpleasant stimuli, using event-related potentials (ERPs). Sixteen participants completed an emotion regulation experiment in which they passively viewed high- or low-intensity unpleasant images (view), solved a mathematical equation presented on high- or low-intensity negative images (distraction), or suppressed their emotional expression in response to high- or low-intensity unpleasant images (suppression). Their negative experiences after implementation of these strategies were rated by participants on a 1–9 scale. We mainly found that compared with expressive suppression, distraction yielded greater attenuation of the early phase of centro-parietal LPP when the participants responded to high-intensity stimuli. In the low-intensity condition, distraction, but not expressive suppression, effectively decreased the early phase of LPP. The findings suggest that expressive suppression works as early as distraction in the high-intensity condition; more importantly, distraction is superior to expressive suppression in regulating negative emotion, which is influenced by emotional intensity.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12983-3
spellingShingle Ping Li
Wei Wang
Cong Fan
Chuanlin Zhu
Shuaixia Li
Zhao Zhang
Zhengyang Qi
Wenbo Luo
Distraction and Expressive Suppression Strategies in Regulation of High- and Low-Intensity Negative Emotions
Scientific Reports
title Distraction and Expressive Suppression Strategies in Regulation of High- and Low-Intensity Negative Emotions
title_full Distraction and Expressive Suppression Strategies in Regulation of High- and Low-Intensity Negative Emotions
title_fullStr Distraction and Expressive Suppression Strategies in Regulation of High- and Low-Intensity Negative Emotions
title_full_unstemmed Distraction and Expressive Suppression Strategies in Regulation of High- and Low-Intensity Negative Emotions
title_short Distraction and Expressive Suppression Strategies in Regulation of High- and Low-Intensity Negative Emotions
title_sort distraction and expressive suppression strategies in regulation of high and low intensity negative emotions
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12983-3
work_keys_str_mv AT pingli distractionandexpressivesuppressionstrategiesinregulationofhighandlowintensitynegativeemotions
AT weiwang distractionandexpressivesuppressionstrategiesinregulationofhighandlowintensitynegativeemotions
AT congfan distractionandexpressivesuppressionstrategiesinregulationofhighandlowintensitynegativeemotions
AT chuanlinzhu distractionandexpressivesuppressionstrategiesinregulationofhighandlowintensitynegativeemotions
AT shuaixiali distractionandexpressivesuppressionstrategiesinregulationofhighandlowintensitynegativeemotions
AT zhaozhang distractionandexpressivesuppressionstrategiesinregulationofhighandlowintensitynegativeemotions
AT zhengyangqi distractionandexpressivesuppressionstrategiesinregulationofhighandlowintensitynegativeemotions
AT wenboluo distractionandexpressivesuppressionstrategiesinregulationofhighandlowintensitynegativeemotions