Evaluating Public Deliberation: Including the Audience Perspective
I argue that in evaluating public deliberation, the basic criterion should be how deliberating citizens’ need for usable input is met, rather than how the debaters embody Habermasian consensus-oriented ideals, and I question assessment of “deliberative quality” on that basis, such as the “Discourse...
Main Author: | Christian Kock |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Westminster Press
2021-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Deliberative Democracy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/945/ |
Similar Items
-
The practice and pragmatics of Scandinavian research in rhetoric. Audience studies in Scandinavian rhetorical scholarship
by: Jens Kjeldsen
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Deliberation, Competition, or Practice?
by: Winsvold Marte
Published: (2013-07-01) -
A PERSPECTIVE ON THE OPERA AUDIENCE OF THE 21st CENTURY
by: Cristina RADU-GIURGIU
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Speculative fiction and political ideologies: meanings given by the audience
by: Mayte Donstrup
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Deliberate Silences
by: Vincent Jungkunz
Published: (2013-04-01)