Microbiological quality of beef, mutton, and water from different abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

Background and Aim: Abattoir processes from skinning, evisceration, to chilling usually lead to meat contamination by foodborne pathogens. Hence, continual microbial surveillance of slaughter carcasses by veterinary public health officials is key to preventing contamination and outbreak of meat-rela...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philisani Ncoko, Ishmael Festus Jaja, James Wabwire Oguttu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Veterinary World 2020-07-01
Series:Veterinary World
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.13/July-2020/16.pdf
_version_ 1818602185997418496
author Philisani Ncoko
Ishmael Festus Jaja
James Wabwire Oguttu
author_facet Philisani Ncoko
Ishmael Festus Jaja
James Wabwire Oguttu
author_sort Philisani Ncoko
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aim: Abattoir processes from skinning, evisceration, to chilling usually lead to meat contamination by foodborne pathogens. Hence, continual microbial surveillance of slaughter carcasses by veterinary public health officials is key to preventing contamination and outbreak of meat-related foodborne diseases. This study was conducted to determine the Enterobacteriaceae count and aerobic plate count (APC) and to detect Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. in meat and water from selected slaughter facilities. Materials and Methods: Retrospective data (n=100) collected in 2017 by the Provincial Veterinary Department of the Eastern Cape Province from abattoirs and prospective survey data of meat (n=50) collected in 2018 from abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province were utilized in this study. APC and Enterobacteriaceae were enumerated from the samples. In addition, Salmonella and E. coli were isolated from samples using selective media. Results: The APC in both retrospective and prospective studies for all samples ranged between 2 and 4.50 log CFU/cm2; similar counts of 2-4.00 log CFU/cm2 were recorded for Enterobacteriaceae. No significant difference (p>0.05) for APC and Enterobacteriaceae count across all meat types was noted. Salmonella and E. coli were detected in 50% of beef. E. coli was not detected from mutton, but Salmonella was found in 66.7%. Moreover, 91.7% of the water samples had E. coli, but none had Salmonella. Conclusion: The levels of Enterobacteriaceae and APC observed in meat satisfy regulatory conditions outlined by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, South Africa and show that meat produced from these abattoirs is of acceptable microbial quality. However, the quality of water used in the abattoirs does not meet the requirements set by the government, and contributes to contamination of meat produced in the abattoirs under study. Therefore, we recommend that sources of water be continuously investigated to eliminate or reduce the risk of contamination of meat processed in the abattoirs.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T13:03:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f7e69b3119a74004bfc0226836fd4871
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-8988
2231-0916
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T13:03:16Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Veterinary World
record_format Article
series Veterinary World
spelling doaj.art-f7e69b3119a74004bfc0226836fd48712022-12-21T22:30:47ZengVeterinary WorldVeterinary World0972-89882231-09162020-07-011371363137110.14202/vetworld.2020.1363-1371Microbiological quality of beef, mutton, and water from different abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province, South AfricaPhilisani Ncoko0Ishmael Festus Jaja1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9310-6511James Wabwire Oguttu2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-4437Department of Livestock and Pasture, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.Department of Livestock and Pasture, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa; Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa, Florida Campus, Johannesburg, 1709, South Africa.Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa, Florida Campus, Johannesburg, 1709, South Africa.Background and Aim: Abattoir processes from skinning, evisceration, to chilling usually lead to meat contamination by foodborne pathogens. Hence, continual microbial surveillance of slaughter carcasses by veterinary public health officials is key to preventing contamination and outbreak of meat-related foodborne diseases. This study was conducted to determine the Enterobacteriaceae count and aerobic plate count (APC) and to detect Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. in meat and water from selected slaughter facilities. Materials and Methods: Retrospective data (n=100) collected in 2017 by the Provincial Veterinary Department of the Eastern Cape Province from abattoirs and prospective survey data of meat (n=50) collected in 2018 from abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province were utilized in this study. APC and Enterobacteriaceae were enumerated from the samples. In addition, Salmonella and E. coli were isolated from samples using selective media. Results: The APC in both retrospective and prospective studies for all samples ranged between 2 and 4.50 log CFU/cm2; similar counts of 2-4.00 log CFU/cm2 were recorded for Enterobacteriaceae. No significant difference (p>0.05) for APC and Enterobacteriaceae count across all meat types was noted. Salmonella and E. coli were detected in 50% of beef. E. coli was not detected from mutton, but Salmonella was found in 66.7%. Moreover, 91.7% of the water samples had E. coli, but none had Salmonella. Conclusion: The levels of Enterobacteriaceae and APC observed in meat satisfy regulatory conditions outlined by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, South Africa and show that meat produced from these abattoirs is of acceptable microbial quality. However, the quality of water used in the abattoirs does not meet the requirements set by the government, and contributes to contamination of meat produced in the abattoirs under study. Therefore, we recommend that sources of water be continuously investigated to eliminate or reduce the risk of contamination of meat processed in the abattoirs.http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.13/July-2020/16.pdfcontaminationfoodborne pathogenshygienemeat spoilagewater quality
spellingShingle Philisani Ncoko
Ishmael Festus Jaja
James Wabwire Oguttu
Microbiological quality of beef, mutton, and water from different abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
Veterinary World
contamination
foodborne pathogens
hygiene
meat spoilage
water quality
title Microbiological quality of beef, mutton, and water from different abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
title_full Microbiological quality of beef, mutton, and water from different abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
title_fullStr Microbiological quality of beef, mutton, and water from different abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Microbiological quality of beef, mutton, and water from different abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
title_short Microbiological quality of beef, mutton, and water from different abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
title_sort microbiological quality of beef mutton and water from different abattoirs in the eastern cape province south africa
topic contamination
foodborne pathogens
hygiene
meat spoilage
water quality
url http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.13/July-2020/16.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT philisanincoko microbiologicalqualityofbeefmuttonandwaterfromdifferentabattoirsintheeasterncapeprovincesouthafrica
AT ishmaelfestusjaja microbiologicalqualityofbeefmuttonandwaterfromdifferentabattoirsintheeasterncapeprovincesouthafrica
AT jameswabwireoguttu microbiologicalqualityofbeefmuttonandwaterfromdifferentabattoirsintheeasterncapeprovincesouthafrica