Exclusion Through Inclusion. Struggles Over the Scalar Regimes of Belonging Europe and the Family at the 1995 Fourth UN World Conference on Women and the Agency of (Polish) Women

Gender regimes of belonging are contextually variable and closely linked to other regimes of belonging, such as the family, the nation, or, the region. In the case of Poland, this contextuality and interdependence becomes apparent when analyzing struggles between feminist and Catholic anti-choice en...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jennifer Ramme
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00055/full
_version_ 1818296488598437888
author Jennifer Ramme
Jennifer Ramme
author_facet Jennifer Ramme
Jennifer Ramme
author_sort Jennifer Ramme
collection DOAJ
description Gender regimes of belonging are contextually variable and closely linked to other regimes of belonging, such as the family, the nation, or, the region. In the case of Poland, this contextuality and interdependence becomes apparent when analyzing struggles between feminist and Catholic anti-choice environments. While the first group opts for gender democracy, the other favors a familistic social order. In the mid-90s, the struggle over “Polish” gender regimes took an international dimension and was played out as well at the international fora of the UN. When women's rights actors from Poland appeared at the 4th World Conference on Women held by the UN in China in 1995, they experienced being positioned within a pre-structured spatial order and learned that this positioning and the synthesis within scalar regimes of belonging, such as the scale of family but also that of region, have a major impact on their political agency. The spatial order of the UN is a field of conflict, as certain positioning within regimes of belonging might limit political agency and therefore constrain the making of claims. NGOs struggle to get representation and definitional power over space and collective identity categories, but they also put effort into changing the very composition and hierarchies within identity regimes. Toward this end, they form coalitions and networks and perform group identities and may even act in opposition to institutionalized regimes of belonging. The use of concepts such as belonging and scale allows us to avoid the analytical limits that are linked to the theoretical frameworks of recognition and identity politics. This article explores the strategies of scalar politics of belonging applied by NGOs, which also lead to the establishment of bodies representing women from the post-socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe, such as the Karat Coalition, but it also draws attention to the political effects of scaling belonging through the “family” or “Europe.” Today, the question as to what shape gender regimes of belonging should take is still an important site of struggle.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T04:04:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f7fa2d5064e0476fbe9d37ff2793cd75
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-7775
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T04:04:20Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Sociology
spelling doaj.art-f7fa2d5064e0476fbe9d37ff2793cd752022-12-22T00:00:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sociology2297-77752019-07-01410.3389/fsoc.2019.00055455561Exclusion Through Inclusion. Struggles Over the Scalar Regimes of Belonging Europe and the Family at the 1995 Fourth UN World Conference on Women and the Agency of (Polish) WomenJennifer Ramme0Jennifer Ramme1Polish-German Cultural-and Literary Relations and Gender Studies, Faculty of Cultural and Social Science, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt, GermanyThe Viadrina Institut für European Studies, Frankfurt, GermanyGender regimes of belonging are contextually variable and closely linked to other regimes of belonging, such as the family, the nation, or, the region. In the case of Poland, this contextuality and interdependence becomes apparent when analyzing struggles between feminist and Catholic anti-choice environments. While the first group opts for gender democracy, the other favors a familistic social order. In the mid-90s, the struggle over “Polish” gender regimes took an international dimension and was played out as well at the international fora of the UN. When women's rights actors from Poland appeared at the 4th World Conference on Women held by the UN in China in 1995, they experienced being positioned within a pre-structured spatial order and learned that this positioning and the synthesis within scalar regimes of belonging, such as the scale of family but also that of region, have a major impact on their political agency. The spatial order of the UN is a field of conflict, as certain positioning within regimes of belonging might limit political agency and therefore constrain the making of claims. NGOs struggle to get representation and definitional power over space and collective identity categories, but they also put effort into changing the very composition and hierarchies within identity regimes. Toward this end, they form coalitions and networks and perform group identities and may even act in opposition to institutionalized regimes of belonging. The use of concepts such as belonging and scale allows us to avoid the analytical limits that are linked to the theoretical frameworks of recognition and identity politics. This article explores the strategies of scalar politics of belonging applied by NGOs, which also lead to the establishment of bodies representing women from the post-socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe, such as the Karat Coalition, but it also draws attention to the political effects of scaling belonging through the “family” or “Europe.” Today, the question as to what shape gender regimes of belonging should take is still an important site of struggle.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00055/fullscalesagencyfamilismtransnational feminismPolandCentral and Eastern Europe (CEE)
spellingShingle Jennifer Ramme
Jennifer Ramme
Exclusion Through Inclusion. Struggles Over the Scalar Regimes of Belonging Europe and the Family at the 1995 Fourth UN World Conference on Women and the Agency of (Polish) Women
Frontiers in Sociology
scales
agency
familism
transnational feminism
Poland
Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)
title Exclusion Through Inclusion. Struggles Over the Scalar Regimes of Belonging Europe and the Family at the 1995 Fourth UN World Conference on Women and the Agency of (Polish) Women
title_full Exclusion Through Inclusion. Struggles Over the Scalar Regimes of Belonging Europe and the Family at the 1995 Fourth UN World Conference on Women and the Agency of (Polish) Women
title_fullStr Exclusion Through Inclusion. Struggles Over the Scalar Regimes of Belonging Europe and the Family at the 1995 Fourth UN World Conference on Women and the Agency of (Polish) Women
title_full_unstemmed Exclusion Through Inclusion. Struggles Over the Scalar Regimes of Belonging Europe and the Family at the 1995 Fourth UN World Conference on Women and the Agency of (Polish) Women
title_short Exclusion Through Inclusion. Struggles Over the Scalar Regimes of Belonging Europe and the Family at the 1995 Fourth UN World Conference on Women and the Agency of (Polish) Women
title_sort exclusion through inclusion struggles over the scalar regimes of belonging europe and the family at the 1995 fourth un world conference on women and the agency of polish women
topic scales
agency
familism
transnational feminism
Poland
Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00055/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferramme exclusionthroughinclusionstrugglesoverthescalarregimesofbelongingeuropeandthefamilyatthe1995fourthunworldconferenceonwomenandtheagencyofpolishwomen
AT jenniferramme exclusionthroughinclusionstrugglesoverthescalarregimesofbelongingeuropeandthefamilyatthe1995fourthunworldconferenceonwomenandtheagencyofpolishwomen