Comparing Pupil Light Response Modulation between Saccade Planning and Working Memory

The signature of spatial attention effects has been demonstrated through saccade planning and working memory. Although saccade planning and working memory have been commonly linked to attention, the comparison of effects resulting from saccade planning and working memory is less explored. It has rec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chin-An Wang, Jeff Huang, Rachel Yep, Douglas P. Munoz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/33
_version_ 1818893584118579200
author Chin-An Wang
Jeff Huang
Rachel Yep
Douglas P. Munoz
author_facet Chin-An Wang
Jeff Huang
Rachel Yep
Douglas P. Munoz
author_sort Chin-An Wang
collection DOAJ
description The signature of spatial attention effects has been demonstrated through saccade planning and working memory. Although saccade planning and working memory have been commonly linked to attention, the comparison of effects resulting from saccade planning and working memory is less explored. It has recently been shown that spatial attention interacts with local luminance at the attended location. When bright and dark patch stimuli are presented simultaneously in the periphery, thereby producing no change in global luminance, pupil size is nonetheless smaller when the locus of attention overlaps with the bright, compared to the dark patch stimulus (referred to as the local luminance modulation). Here, we used the local luminance modulation to directly compare the effects of saccade planning and spatial working memory. Participants were required to make a saccade towards a visual target location (visual-delay) or a remembered target location (memory-delay) after a variable delay, and the bright and dark patch stimuli were presented during the delay period between target onset and go signal. Greater pupil constriction was observed when the bright patch, compared to the dark patch, was spatially aligned with the target location in both tasks. However, the effects were diminished when there was no contingency implemented between the patch and target locations, particularly in the memory-delay task. Together, our results suggest the involvement of similar, but not identical, attentional mechanisms through saccade planning and working memory, and highlight a promising potential of local pupil luminance responses for probing visuospatial processing.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T18:14:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f801134e93524b69845a9c3b57261224
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2514-4820
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T18:14:55Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Cognition
spelling doaj.art-f801134e93524b69845a9c3b572612242022-12-21T20:11:09ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202018-06-011110.5334/joc.3335Comparing Pupil Light Response Modulation between Saccade Planning and Working MemoryChin-An Wang0Jeff Huang1Rachel Yep2Douglas P. Munoz3Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, OntarioCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, OntarioCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, OntarioCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, OntarioThe signature of spatial attention effects has been demonstrated through saccade planning and working memory. Although saccade planning and working memory have been commonly linked to attention, the comparison of effects resulting from saccade planning and working memory is less explored. It has recently been shown that spatial attention interacts with local luminance at the attended location. When bright and dark patch stimuli are presented simultaneously in the periphery, thereby producing no change in global luminance, pupil size is nonetheless smaller when the locus of attention overlaps with the bright, compared to the dark patch stimulus (referred to as the local luminance modulation). Here, we used the local luminance modulation to directly compare the effects of saccade planning and spatial working memory. Participants were required to make a saccade towards a visual target location (visual-delay) or a remembered target location (memory-delay) after a variable delay, and the bright and dark patch stimuli were presented during the delay period between target onset and go signal. Greater pupil constriction was observed when the bright patch, compared to the dark patch, was spatially aligned with the target location in both tasks. However, the effects were diminished when there was no contingency implemented between the patch and target locations, particularly in the memory-delay task. Together, our results suggest the involvement of similar, but not identical, attentional mechanisms through saccade planning and working memory, and highlight a promising potential of local pupil luminance responses for probing visuospatial processing.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/33attentionsaccade preparationpupil constrictionpupil dilationarousal
spellingShingle Chin-An Wang
Jeff Huang
Rachel Yep
Douglas P. Munoz
Comparing Pupil Light Response Modulation between Saccade Planning and Working Memory
Journal of Cognition
attention
saccade preparation
pupil constriction
pupil dilation
arousal
title Comparing Pupil Light Response Modulation between Saccade Planning and Working Memory
title_full Comparing Pupil Light Response Modulation between Saccade Planning and Working Memory
title_fullStr Comparing Pupil Light Response Modulation between Saccade Planning and Working Memory
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Pupil Light Response Modulation between Saccade Planning and Working Memory
title_short Comparing Pupil Light Response Modulation between Saccade Planning and Working Memory
title_sort comparing pupil light response modulation between saccade planning and working memory
topic attention
saccade preparation
pupil constriction
pupil dilation
arousal
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/33
work_keys_str_mv AT chinanwang comparingpupillightresponsemodulationbetweensaccadeplanningandworkingmemory
AT jeffhuang comparingpupillightresponsemodulationbetweensaccadeplanningandworkingmemory
AT rachelyep comparingpupillightresponsemodulationbetweensaccadeplanningandworkingmemory
AT douglaspmunoz comparingpupillightresponsemodulationbetweensaccadeplanningandworkingmemory