An empirical zenith wet delay correction model using piecewise height functions
<p>Tropospheric delay is an important error source in space geodetic techniques. The temporal and spatial variations of the zenith wet delay (ZWD) are very large and thus limit the accuracy of tropospheric delay modelling. Thus, it is worthwhile undertaking research aimed at constructing a...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-11-01
|
| Series: | Annales Geophysicae |
| Online Access: | https://www.ann-geophys.net/36/1507/2018/angeo-36-1507-2018.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818650289999183872 |
|---|---|
| author | Y. Yao Y. Yao Y. Yao Y. Hu Y. Hu |
| author_facet | Y. Yao Y. Yao Y. Yao Y. Hu Y. Hu |
| author_sort | Y. Yao |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Tropospheric delay is an important error source in space geodetic
techniques. The temporal and spatial variations of the zenith wet delay (ZWD)
are very large and thus limit the accuracy of tropospheric delay modelling.
Thus, it is worthwhile undertaking research aimed at constructing a precise
ZWD model. Based on the analysis of vertical variations of ZWD, we divided
the troposphere into three height intervals (below 2 km, 2 to 5 km, and 5
to 10 km) and determined the fitting functions for the ZWD within these
height intervals. The global empirical ZWD model HZWD, which considers the
periodic variations of ZWD with a spatial resolution of 5° × 5°, is established using the ECMWF ZWD profiles from 2001 to 2010.
Validated by the ECMWF ZWD data in 2015, the precision of the ZWD estimation
in the HZWD model over the three height intervals are improved by 1.4, 0.9,
and 1.2 mm, respectively, compared to that of the currently best GPT2w model
(23.8, 13.1, and 2.6 mm). The test results from ZWD data from 318 radiosonde
stations show that the root mean square error (RMSE) in the HZWD model over
the three height intervals was reduced by 2 % (0.6 mm), 5 %
(0.9 mm), and 33 % (1.7 mm), respectively, compared to the GPT2w model
(30.1, 15.8, and 3.5 mm) over the three height intervals. In addition, the
spatial and temporal stabilities of the HZWD model are higher than those of
GPT2w and UNB3m.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T01:47:52Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f807b2241048463e8e812b09bc98c622 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0992-7689 1432-0576 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T01:47:52Z |
| publishDate | 2018-11-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Annales Geophysicae |
| spelling | doaj.art-f807b2241048463e8e812b09bc98c6222022-12-21T22:08:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762018-11-01361507151910.5194/angeo-36-1507-2018An empirical zenith wet delay correction model using piecewise height functionsY. Yao0Y. Yao1Y. Yao2Y. Hu3Y. Hu4School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, ChinaKey Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center for Geospatial Technology, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, ChinaSchool of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, ChinaCollege of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shanxi, China<p>Tropospheric delay is an important error source in space geodetic techniques. The temporal and spatial variations of the zenith wet delay (ZWD) are very large and thus limit the accuracy of tropospheric delay modelling. Thus, it is worthwhile undertaking research aimed at constructing a precise ZWD model. Based on the analysis of vertical variations of ZWD, we divided the troposphere into three height intervals (below 2 km, 2 to 5 km, and 5 to 10 km) and determined the fitting functions for the ZWD within these height intervals. The global empirical ZWD model HZWD, which considers the periodic variations of ZWD with a spatial resolution of 5° × 5°, is established using the ECMWF ZWD profiles from 2001 to 2010. Validated by the ECMWF ZWD data in 2015, the precision of the ZWD estimation in the HZWD model over the three height intervals are improved by 1.4, 0.9, and 1.2 mm, respectively, compared to that of the currently best GPT2w model (23.8, 13.1, and 2.6 mm). The test results from ZWD data from 318 radiosonde stations show that the root mean square error (RMSE) in the HZWD model over the three height intervals was reduced by 2 % (0.6 mm), 5 % (0.9 mm), and 33 % (1.7 mm), respectively, compared to the GPT2w model (30.1, 15.8, and 3.5 mm) over the three height intervals. In addition, the spatial and temporal stabilities of the HZWD model are higher than those of GPT2w and UNB3m.</p>https://www.ann-geophys.net/36/1507/2018/angeo-36-1507-2018.pdf |
| spellingShingle | Y. Yao Y. Yao Y. Yao Y. Hu Y. Hu An empirical zenith wet delay correction model using piecewise height functions Annales Geophysicae |
| title | An empirical zenith wet delay correction model using piecewise height functions |
| title_full | An empirical zenith wet delay correction model using piecewise height functions |
| title_fullStr | An empirical zenith wet delay correction model using piecewise height functions |
| title_full_unstemmed | An empirical zenith wet delay correction model using piecewise height functions |
| title_short | An empirical zenith wet delay correction model using piecewise height functions |
| title_sort | empirical zenith wet delay correction model using piecewise height functions |
| url | https://www.ann-geophys.net/36/1507/2018/angeo-36-1507-2018.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yyao anempiricalzenithwetdelaycorrectionmodelusingpiecewiseheightfunctions AT yyao anempiricalzenithwetdelaycorrectionmodelusingpiecewiseheightfunctions AT yyao anempiricalzenithwetdelaycorrectionmodelusingpiecewiseheightfunctions AT yhu anempiricalzenithwetdelaycorrectionmodelusingpiecewiseheightfunctions AT yhu anempiricalzenithwetdelaycorrectionmodelusingpiecewiseheightfunctions AT yyao empiricalzenithwetdelaycorrectionmodelusingpiecewiseheightfunctions AT yyao empiricalzenithwetdelaycorrectionmodelusingpiecewiseheightfunctions AT yyao empiricalzenithwetdelaycorrectionmodelusingpiecewiseheightfunctions AT yhu empiricalzenithwetdelaycorrectionmodelusingpiecewiseheightfunctions AT yhu empiricalzenithwetdelaycorrectionmodelusingpiecewiseheightfunctions |