Antibiotic Combination to Effectively Postpone or Inhibit the In Vitro Induction and Selection of Levofloxacin-Resistant Mutants in <i>Elizabethkingia anophelis</i>

Fluoroquinolones are potentially active against <i>Elizabethkingia anophelis</i>. Rapidly increased minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and emerging point mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) following exposure to fluoroquinolones have been reported in &...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ching-Chi Lee, Chung-Hsu Lai, Chih-Hui Yang, Yi-Han Huang, Jiun-Nong Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/25/4/2215
Description
Summary:Fluoroquinolones are potentially active against <i>Elizabethkingia anophelis</i>. Rapidly increased minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and emerging point mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) following exposure to fluoroquinolones have been reported in <i>E. anophelis</i>. We aimed to investigate point mutations in QRDRs through exposure to levofloxacin (1 × MIC) combinations with different concentrations (0.5× and 1 × MIC) of minocycline, rifampin, cefoperazone/sulbactam, or sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim in comparison with exposure to levofloxacin alone. Of the four <i>E. anophelis</i> isolates that were clinically collected, lower MICs of levofloxacin were disclosed in cycle 2 and 3 of induction and selection in all levofloxacin combination groups other than levofloxacin alone (all <i>p</i> = 0.04). Overall, no mutations were discovered in <i>parC</i> and <i>parE</i> throughout the multicycles inducted by levofloxacin and all its combinations. Regarding the vastly increased MICs, the second point mutations in <i>gyrA</i> and/or <i>gyrB</i> in one isolate (strain no. 1) occurred in cycle 2 following exposure to levofloxacin plus 0.5 × MIC minocycline, but they were delayed appearing in cycle 5 following exposure to levofloxacin plus 1 × MIC minocycline. Similarly, the second point mutation in <i>gyrA</i> and/or <i>gyrB</i> occurred in another isolate (strain no. 3) in cycle 4 following exposure to levofloxacin plus 0.5 × MIC sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, but no mutation following exposure to levofloxacin plus 1 × MIC sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim was disclosed. In conclusion, the rapid selection of <i>E. anophelis</i> mutants with high MICs after levofloxacin exposure could be effectively delayed or postponed by antimicrobial combination with other in vitro active antibiotics.
ISSN:1661-6596
1422-0067