Fighting for recovery on multiple fronts: The past, present, and future of clinical trials for spinal cord injury

Through many decades of preclinical research, great progress has been achieved in understanding the complex nature of spinal cord injury (SCI). Preclinical research efforts have guided and shaped clinical trials, which are growing in number by the year. Currently, 1,149 clinical trials focused on im...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valerie A. Dietz, Nolan Roberts, Katelyn Knox, Sherilynne Moore, Michael Pitonak, Chris Barr, Jesus Centeno, Scott Leininger, Kent C. New, Peter Nowell, Matthew Rodreick, Cedric G. Geoffroy, Argyrios Stampas, Jennifer N. Dulin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2022.977679/full
_version_ 1811183429254905856
author Valerie A. Dietz
Nolan Roberts
Katelyn Knox
Sherilynne Moore
Michael Pitonak
Chris Barr
Jesus Centeno
Scott Leininger
Kent C. New
Peter Nowell
Matthew Rodreick
Cedric G. Geoffroy
Cedric G. Geoffroy
Argyrios Stampas
Jennifer N. Dulin
Jennifer N. Dulin
author_facet Valerie A. Dietz
Nolan Roberts
Katelyn Knox
Sherilynne Moore
Michael Pitonak
Chris Barr
Jesus Centeno
Scott Leininger
Kent C. New
Peter Nowell
Matthew Rodreick
Cedric G. Geoffroy
Cedric G. Geoffroy
Argyrios Stampas
Jennifer N. Dulin
Jennifer N. Dulin
author_sort Valerie A. Dietz
collection DOAJ
description Through many decades of preclinical research, great progress has been achieved in understanding the complex nature of spinal cord injury (SCI). Preclinical research efforts have guided and shaped clinical trials, which are growing in number by the year. Currently, 1,149 clinical trials focused on improving outcomes after SCI are registered in the U.S. National Library of Medicine at ClinicalTrials.gov. We conducted a systematic analysis of these SCI clinical trials, using publicly accessible data downloaded from ClinicalTrials.gov. After extracting all available data for these trials, we categorized each trial according to the types of interventions being tested and the types of outcomes assessed. We then evaluated clinical trial characteristics, both globally and by year, in order to understand the areas of growth and change over time. With regard to clinical trial attributes, we found that most trials have low enrollment, only test single interventions, and have limited numbers of primary outcomes. Some gaps in reporting are apparent; for instance, over 75% of clinical trials with “Completed” status do not have results posted, and the Phase of some trials is incorrectly classified as “Not applicable” despite testing a drug or biological compound. When analyzing trials based on types of interventions assessed, we identified the largest representation in trials testing rehab/training/exercise, neuromodulation, and behavioral modifications. Most highly represented primary outcomes include motor function of the upper and lower extremities, safety, and pain. The most highly represented secondary outcomes include quality of life and pain. Over the past 15 years, we identified increased representation of neuromodulation and rehabilitation trials, and decreased representation of drug trials. Overall, the number of new clinical trials initiated each year continues to grow, signifying a hopeful future for the clinical treatment of SCI. Together, our work provides a comprehensive glimpse into the past, present, and future of SCI clinical trials, and suggests areas for improvement in clinical trial reporting.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T09:45:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f82223113c9346de9d47ed5a8afe916f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5102
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T09:45:54Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-f82223113c9346de9d47ed5a8afe916f2022-12-22T04:31:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience1662-51022022-09-011610.3389/fncel.2022.977679977679Fighting for recovery on multiple fronts: The past, present, and future of clinical trials for spinal cord injuryValerie A. Dietz0Nolan Roberts1Katelyn Knox2Sherilynne Moore3Michael Pitonak4Chris Barr5Jesus Centeno6Scott Leininger7Kent C. New8Peter Nowell9Matthew Rodreick10Cedric G. Geoffroy11Cedric G. Geoffroy12Argyrios Stampas13Jennifer N. Dulin14Jennifer N. Dulin15Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesUnite 2 Fight Paralysis, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesUnite 2 Fight Paralysis, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesUnite 2 Fight Paralysis, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesUnite 2 Fight Paralysis, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesUnite 2 Fight Paralysis, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesUnite 2 Fight Paralysis, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesDepartment of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesTexas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, UTHealth Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United StatesDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesTexas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesThrough many decades of preclinical research, great progress has been achieved in understanding the complex nature of spinal cord injury (SCI). Preclinical research efforts have guided and shaped clinical trials, which are growing in number by the year. Currently, 1,149 clinical trials focused on improving outcomes after SCI are registered in the U.S. National Library of Medicine at ClinicalTrials.gov. We conducted a systematic analysis of these SCI clinical trials, using publicly accessible data downloaded from ClinicalTrials.gov. After extracting all available data for these trials, we categorized each trial according to the types of interventions being tested and the types of outcomes assessed. We then evaluated clinical trial characteristics, both globally and by year, in order to understand the areas of growth and change over time. With regard to clinical trial attributes, we found that most trials have low enrollment, only test single interventions, and have limited numbers of primary outcomes. Some gaps in reporting are apparent; for instance, over 75% of clinical trials with “Completed” status do not have results posted, and the Phase of some trials is incorrectly classified as “Not applicable” despite testing a drug or biological compound. When analyzing trials based on types of interventions assessed, we identified the largest representation in trials testing rehab/training/exercise, neuromodulation, and behavioral modifications. Most highly represented primary outcomes include motor function of the upper and lower extremities, safety, and pain. The most highly represented secondary outcomes include quality of life and pain. Over the past 15 years, we identified increased representation of neuromodulation and rehabilitation trials, and decreased representation of drug trials. Overall, the number of new clinical trials initiated each year continues to grow, signifying a hopeful future for the clinical treatment of SCI. Together, our work provides a comprehensive glimpse into the past, present, and future of SCI clinical trials, and suggests areas for improvement in clinical trial reporting.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2022.977679/fullclinical trialspinal cord injurysystematic analysistrendsoutcomesinterventions
spellingShingle Valerie A. Dietz
Nolan Roberts
Katelyn Knox
Sherilynne Moore
Michael Pitonak
Chris Barr
Jesus Centeno
Scott Leininger
Kent C. New
Peter Nowell
Matthew Rodreick
Cedric G. Geoffroy
Cedric G. Geoffroy
Argyrios Stampas
Jennifer N. Dulin
Jennifer N. Dulin
Fighting for recovery on multiple fronts: The past, present, and future of clinical trials for spinal cord injury
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
clinical trial
spinal cord injury
systematic analysis
trends
outcomes
interventions
title Fighting for recovery on multiple fronts: The past, present, and future of clinical trials for spinal cord injury
title_full Fighting for recovery on multiple fronts: The past, present, and future of clinical trials for spinal cord injury
title_fullStr Fighting for recovery on multiple fronts: The past, present, and future of clinical trials for spinal cord injury
title_full_unstemmed Fighting for recovery on multiple fronts: The past, present, and future of clinical trials for spinal cord injury
title_short Fighting for recovery on multiple fronts: The past, present, and future of clinical trials for spinal cord injury
title_sort fighting for recovery on multiple fronts the past present and future of clinical trials for spinal cord injury
topic clinical trial
spinal cord injury
systematic analysis
trends
outcomes
interventions
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2022.977679/full
work_keys_str_mv AT valerieadietz fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT nolanroberts fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT katelynknox fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT sherilynnemoore fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT michaelpitonak fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT chrisbarr fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT jesuscenteno fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT scottleininger fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT kentcnew fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT peternowell fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT matthewrodreick fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT cedricggeoffroy fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT cedricggeoffroy fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT argyriosstampas fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT jenniferndulin fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury
AT jenniferndulin fightingforrecoveryonmultiplefrontsthepastpresentandfutureofclinicaltrialsforspinalcordinjury