Towards Standardization of Data Normalization Strategies to Improve Urinary Metabolomics Studies by GC×GC-TOFMS

Urine is a popular biofluid for metabolomics studies due to its simple, non-invasive collection and its availability in large quantities, permitting frequent sampling, replicate analyses, and sample banking. The biggest disadvantage with using urine is that it exhibits significant variability in con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seo Lin Nam, A. Paulina de la Mata, Ryan P. Dias, James J Harynuk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Metabolites
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/10/9/376
_version_ 1827705902890745856
author Seo Lin Nam
A. Paulina de la Mata
Ryan P. Dias
James J Harynuk
author_facet Seo Lin Nam
A. Paulina de la Mata
Ryan P. Dias
James J Harynuk
author_sort Seo Lin Nam
collection DOAJ
description Urine is a popular biofluid for metabolomics studies due to its simple, non-invasive collection and its availability in large quantities, permitting frequent sampling, replicate analyses, and sample banking. The biggest disadvantage with using urine is that it exhibits significant variability in concentration and composition within an individual over relatively short periods of time (arising from various external factors and internal processes regulating the body’s water and solute content). In treating the data from urinary metabolomics studies, one must account for the natural variability of urine concentrations to avoid erroneous data interpretation. Amongst various proposed approaches to account for broadly varying urine sample concentrations, normalization to creatinine has been widely accepted and is most commonly used. MS total useful signal (MSTUS) is another normalization method that has been recently reported for mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics studies. Herein, we explored total useful peak area (TUPA), a modification of MSTUS that is applicable to GC×GC-TOFMS (and data from other separations platforms), for sample normalization in urinary metabolomics studies. Performance of TUPA was compared to the two most common normalization approaches, creatinine adjustment and Total Peak Area (TPA) normalization. Each normalized dataset was evaluated using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The results showed that TUPA outperformed alternative normalization methods to overcome urine concentration variability. Results also conclusively demonstrate the risks in normalizing data to creatinine.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:13:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f830026696ae48318d412b2ba29a5cfc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2218-1989
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:13:09Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Metabolites
spelling doaj.art-f830026696ae48318d412b2ba29a5cfc2023-11-20T14:22:01ZengMDPI AGMetabolites2218-19892020-09-0110937610.3390/metabo10090376Towards Standardization of Data Normalization Strategies to Improve Urinary Metabolomics Studies by GC×GC-TOFMSSeo Lin Nam0A. Paulina de la Mata1Ryan P. Dias2James J Harynuk3Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G2, CanadaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G2, CanadaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G2, CanadaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G2, CanadaUrine is a popular biofluid for metabolomics studies due to its simple, non-invasive collection and its availability in large quantities, permitting frequent sampling, replicate analyses, and sample banking. The biggest disadvantage with using urine is that it exhibits significant variability in concentration and composition within an individual over relatively short periods of time (arising from various external factors and internal processes regulating the body’s water and solute content). In treating the data from urinary metabolomics studies, one must account for the natural variability of urine concentrations to avoid erroneous data interpretation. Amongst various proposed approaches to account for broadly varying urine sample concentrations, normalization to creatinine has been widely accepted and is most commonly used. MS total useful signal (MSTUS) is another normalization method that has been recently reported for mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics studies. Herein, we explored total useful peak area (TUPA), a modification of MSTUS that is applicable to GC×GC-TOFMS (and data from other separations platforms), for sample normalization in urinary metabolomics studies. Performance of TUPA was compared to the two most common normalization approaches, creatinine adjustment and Total Peak Area (TPA) normalization. Each normalized dataset was evaluated using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The results showed that TUPA outperformed alternative normalization methods to overcome urine concentration variability. Results also conclusively demonstrate the risks in normalizing data to creatinine.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/10/9/376urinemetabolomicsnormalizationmass spectrometryGC×GC-TOFMScreatinine
spellingShingle Seo Lin Nam
A. Paulina de la Mata
Ryan P. Dias
James J Harynuk
Towards Standardization of Data Normalization Strategies to Improve Urinary Metabolomics Studies by GC×GC-TOFMS
Metabolites
urine
metabolomics
normalization
mass spectrometry
GC×GC-TOFMS
creatinine
title Towards Standardization of Data Normalization Strategies to Improve Urinary Metabolomics Studies by GC×GC-TOFMS
title_full Towards Standardization of Data Normalization Strategies to Improve Urinary Metabolomics Studies by GC×GC-TOFMS
title_fullStr Towards Standardization of Data Normalization Strategies to Improve Urinary Metabolomics Studies by GC×GC-TOFMS
title_full_unstemmed Towards Standardization of Data Normalization Strategies to Improve Urinary Metabolomics Studies by GC×GC-TOFMS
title_short Towards Standardization of Data Normalization Strategies to Improve Urinary Metabolomics Studies by GC×GC-TOFMS
title_sort towards standardization of data normalization strategies to improve urinary metabolomics studies by gc gc tofms
topic urine
metabolomics
normalization
mass spectrometry
GC×GC-TOFMS
creatinine
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/10/9/376
work_keys_str_mv AT seolinnam towardsstandardizationofdatanormalizationstrategiestoimproveurinarymetabolomicsstudiesbygcgctofms
AT apaulinadelamata towardsstandardizationofdatanormalizationstrategiestoimproveurinarymetabolomicsstudiesbygcgctofms
AT ryanpdias towardsstandardizationofdatanormalizationstrategiestoimproveurinarymetabolomicsstudiesbygcgctofms
AT jamesjharynuk towardsstandardizationofdatanormalizationstrategiestoimproveurinarymetabolomicsstudiesbygcgctofms