Criteria for Validity of Electronic Records
The validity of electronic evidence is recognized by Electronic Commerce Act (1382) and Electronic Crimes Act (1389), and hence, there is no problem to rely on it. Having said that, it is important to examine this issue by considering the followings: First, to illustrate its evidentiary nature as a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
2014-09-01
|
| Series: | Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_868_6374b52dc896093b6f0e3e96e03519ae.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797375904518766592 |
|---|---|
| author | Amir Sadeghi Neshat |
| author_facet | Amir Sadeghi Neshat |
| author_sort | Amir Sadeghi Neshat |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The validity of electronic evidence is recognized by Electronic Commerce Act (1382) and Electronic Crimes Act (1389), and hence, there is no problem to rely on it. Having said that, it is important to examine this issue by considering the followings: First, to illustrate its evidentiary nature as a document. Second, to discuss relevant provisions of the Acts and existing shortcomings. Third, to address problems of quality of the current technology for the purpose of meeting legal standards in relation to the originality of evidence against its copy. This article deals with the above-mentioned issues and proposes some suggestions for reforming the Electronic Commerce Act. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:31:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f8378c5a8ab649769579d41327194ebd |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2345-3583 2476-6232 |
| language | fas |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:31:00Z |
| publishDate | 2014-09-01 |
| publisher | Allameh Tabataba'i University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī |
| spelling | doaj.art-f8378c5a8ab649769579d41327194ebd2023-12-26T07:46:47ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī2345-35832476-62322014-09-01384661868Criteria for Validity of Electronic RecordsAmir Sadeghi Neshat0دانشیار گروه حقوق دانشگاه تهرانThe validity of electronic evidence is recognized by Electronic Commerce Act (1382) and Electronic Crimes Act (1389), and hence, there is no problem to rely on it. Having said that, it is important to examine this issue by considering the followings: First, to illustrate its evidentiary nature as a document. Second, to discuss relevant provisions of the Acts and existing shortcomings. Third, to address problems of quality of the current technology for the purpose of meeting legal standards in relation to the originality of evidence against its copy. This article deals with the above-mentioned issues and proposes some suggestions for reforming the Electronic Commerce Act.https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_868_6374b52dc896093b6f0e3e96e03519ae.pdfsubstantive evidenceelectronic evidenceelectronic signatureoriginality |
| spellingShingle | Amir Sadeghi Neshat Criteria for Validity of Electronic Records Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī substantive evidence electronic evidence electronic signature originality |
| title | Criteria for Validity of Electronic Records |
| title_full | Criteria for Validity of Electronic Records |
| title_fullStr | Criteria for Validity of Electronic Records |
| title_full_unstemmed | Criteria for Validity of Electronic Records |
| title_short | Criteria for Validity of Electronic Records |
| title_sort | criteria for validity of electronic records |
| topic | substantive evidence electronic evidence electronic signature originality |
| url | https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_868_6374b52dc896093b6f0e3e96e03519ae.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amirsadeghineshat criteriaforvalidityofelectronicrecords |