Éloge et critique de l’efficience économique : Quesnay, Smith, Rousseau

Economic efficiency is defined in the 18th century, by Quesnay as well as by Smith, as the maximization of the surplus generated by an economy. For Quesnay, the surplus is consumed for pleasure, while for Smith it is mainly accumulated in order to increase the productive power of labor. Rousseau is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Claire Pignol
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut du Monde Anglophone
Series:Etudes Epistémè
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/17431
_version_ 1797223298008875008
author Claire Pignol
author_facet Claire Pignol
author_sort Claire Pignol
collection DOAJ
description Economic efficiency is defined in the 18th century, by Quesnay as well as by Smith, as the maximization of the surplus generated by an economy. For Quesnay, the surplus is consumed for pleasure, while for Smith it is mainly accumulated in order to increase the productive power of labor. Rousseau is constantly hostile to efficiency, wants to proscribe any invention that might shorten labor, and urges the production of only perishable goods. Rousseau, although he praises the superfluous, also points out the threats that its uses and its consequences bring to the agents’ expectations, when it turns into a necessity whose deprivation is painful. Where Smith encouraged a far-sighted agent to save for his future happiness, Rousseau invites a foresight that accepts the transience of pleasures and is able not to depend on the permanence of present wealth.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:35:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f839cba16f5a4aa09bfd70fa36ccd0d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1634-0450
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:35:00Z
publisher Institut du Monde Anglophone
record_format Article
series Etudes Epistémè
spelling doaj.art-f839cba16f5a4aa09bfd70fa36ccd0d02024-04-04T09:25:53ZengInstitut du Monde AnglophoneEtudes Epistémè1634-04504410.4000/episteme.17431Éloge et critique de l’efficience économique : Quesnay, Smith, RousseauClaire PignolEconomic efficiency is defined in the 18th century, by Quesnay as well as by Smith, as the maximization of the surplus generated by an economy. For Quesnay, the surplus is consumed for pleasure, while for Smith it is mainly accumulated in order to increase the productive power of labor. Rousseau is constantly hostile to efficiency, wants to proscribe any invention that might shorten labor, and urges the production of only perishable goods. Rousseau, although he praises the superfluous, also points out the threats that its uses and its consequences bring to the agents’ expectations, when it turns into a necessity whose deprivation is painful. Where Smith encouraged a far-sighted agent to save for his future happiness, Rousseau invites a foresight that accepts the transience of pleasures and is able not to depend on the permanence of present wealth.https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/17431economic efficiencyshortagesurpluslabor productivityneeds
spellingShingle Claire Pignol
Éloge et critique de l’efficience économique : Quesnay, Smith, Rousseau
Etudes Epistémè
economic efficiency
shortage
surplus
labor productivity
needs
title Éloge et critique de l’efficience économique : Quesnay, Smith, Rousseau
title_full Éloge et critique de l’efficience économique : Quesnay, Smith, Rousseau
title_fullStr Éloge et critique de l’efficience économique : Quesnay, Smith, Rousseau
title_full_unstemmed Éloge et critique de l’efficience économique : Quesnay, Smith, Rousseau
title_short Éloge et critique de l’efficience économique : Quesnay, Smith, Rousseau
title_sort eloge et critique de l efficience economique quesnay smith rousseau
topic economic efficiency
shortage
surplus
labor productivity
needs
url https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/17431
work_keys_str_mv AT clairepignol elogeetcritiquedelefficienceeconomiquequesnaysmithrousseau