Strains and stressors: an analysis of touchscreen learning in genetically diverse mouse strains.

Touchscreen-based systems are growing in popularity as a tractable, translational approach for studying learning and cognition in rodents. However, while mouse strains are well known to differ in learning across various settings, performance variation between strains in touchscreen learning has not...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carolyn Graybeal, Munisa Bachu, Khyobeni Mozhui, Lisa M Saksida, Timothy J Bussey, Erica Sagalyn, Robert W Williams, Andrew Holmes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0087745&type=printable
_version_ 1826588517168316416
author Carolyn Graybeal
Munisa Bachu
Khyobeni Mozhui
Lisa M Saksida
Timothy J Bussey
Erica Sagalyn
Robert W Williams
Andrew Holmes
author_facet Carolyn Graybeal
Munisa Bachu
Khyobeni Mozhui
Lisa M Saksida
Timothy J Bussey
Erica Sagalyn
Robert W Williams
Andrew Holmes
author_sort Carolyn Graybeal
collection DOAJ
description Touchscreen-based systems are growing in popularity as a tractable, translational approach for studying learning and cognition in rodents. However, while mouse strains are well known to differ in learning across various settings, performance variation between strains in touchscreen learning has not been well described. The selection of appropriate genetic strains and backgrounds is critical to the design of touchscreen-based studies and provides a basis for elucidating genetic factors moderating behavior. Here we provide a quantitative foundation for visual discrimination and reversal learning using touchscreen assays across a total of 35 genotypes. We found significant differences in operant performance and learning, including faster reversal learning in DBA/2J compared to C57BL/6J mice. We then assessed DBA/2J and C57BL/6J for differential sensitivity to an environmental insult by testing for alterations in reversal learning following exposure to repeated swim stress. Stress facilitated reversal learning (selectively during the late stage of reversal) in C57BL/6J, but did not affect learning in DBA/2J. To dissect genetic factors underlying these differences, we phenotyped a family of 27 BXD strains generated by crossing C57BL/6J and DBA/2J. There was marked variation in discrimination, reversal and extinction learning across the BXD strains, suggesting this task may be useful for identifying underlying genetic differences. Moreover, different measures of touchscreen learning were only modestly correlated in the BXD strains, indicating that these processes are comparatively independent at both genetic and phenotypic levels. Finally, we examined the behavioral structure of learning via principal component analysis of the current data, plus an archival dataset, totaling 765 mice. This revealed 5 independent factors suggestive of "reversal learning," "motivation-related late reversal learning," "discrimination learning," "speed to respond," and "motivation during discrimination." Together, these findings provide a valuable reference to inform the choice of strains and genetic backgrounds in future studies using touchscreen-based tasks.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T05:20:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f84780d4a5d74f2b973c1bb3b6f5f5c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-14T16:42:35Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-f84780d4a5d74f2b973c1bb3b6f5f5c22025-02-21T05:39:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0192e8774510.1371/journal.pone.0087745Strains and stressors: an analysis of touchscreen learning in genetically diverse mouse strains.Carolyn GraybealMunisa BachuKhyobeni MozhuiLisa M SaksidaTimothy J BusseyErica SagalynRobert W WilliamsAndrew HolmesTouchscreen-based systems are growing in popularity as a tractable, translational approach for studying learning and cognition in rodents. However, while mouse strains are well known to differ in learning across various settings, performance variation between strains in touchscreen learning has not been well described. The selection of appropriate genetic strains and backgrounds is critical to the design of touchscreen-based studies and provides a basis for elucidating genetic factors moderating behavior. Here we provide a quantitative foundation for visual discrimination and reversal learning using touchscreen assays across a total of 35 genotypes. We found significant differences in operant performance and learning, including faster reversal learning in DBA/2J compared to C57BL/6J mice. We then assessed DBA/2J and C57BL/6J for differential sensitivity to an environmental insult by testing for alterations in reversal learning following exposure to repeated swim stress. Stress facilitated reversal learning (selectively during the late stage of reversal) in C57BL/6J, but did not affect learning in DBA/2J. To dissect genetic factors underlying these differences, we phenotyped a family of 27 BXD strains generated by crossing C57BL/6J and DBA/2J. There was marked variation in discrimination, reversal and extinction learning across the BXD strains, suggesting this task may be useful for identifying underlying genetic differences. Moreover, different measures of touchscreen learning were only modestly correlated in the BXD strains, indicating that these processes are comparatively independent at both genetic and phenotypic levels. Finally, we examined the behavioral structure of learning via principal component analysis of the current data, plus an archival dataset, totaling 765 mice. This revealed 5 independent factors suggestive of "reversal learning," "motivation-related late reversal learning," "discrimination learning," "speed to respond," and "motivation during discrimination." Together, these findings provide a valuable reference to inform the choice of strains and genetic backgrounds in future studies using touchscreen-based tasks.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0087745&type=printable
spellingShingle Carolyn Graybeal
Munisa Bachu
Khyobeni Mozhui
Lisa M Saksida
Timothy J Bussey
Erica Sagalyn
Robert W Williams
Andrew Holmes
Strains and stressors: an analysis of touchscreen learning in genetically diverse mouse strains.
PLoS ONE
title Strains and stressors: an analysis of touchscreen learning in genetically diverse mouse strains.
title_full Strains and stressors: an analysis of touchscreen learning in genetically diverse mouse strains.
title_fullStr Strains and stressors: an analysis of touchscreen learning in genetically diverse mouse strains.
title_full_unstemmed Strains and stressors: an analysis of touchscreen learning in genetically diverse mouse strains.
title_short Strains and stressors: an analysis of touchscreen learning in genetically diverse mouse strains.
title_sort strains and stressors an analysis of touchscreen learning in genetically diverse mouse strains
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0087745&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT carolyngraybeal strainsandstressorsananalysisoftouchscreenlearningingeneticallydiversemousestrains
AT munisabachu strainsandstressorsananalysisoftouchscreenlearningingeneticallydiversemousestrains
AT khyobenimozhui strainsandstressorsananalysisoftouchscreenlearningingeneticallydiversemousestrains
AT lisamsaksida strainsandstressorsananalysisoftouchscreenlearningingeneticallydiversemousestrains
AT timothyjbussey strainsandstressorsananalysisoftouchscreenlearningingeneticallydiversemousestrains
AT ericasagalyn strainsandstressorsananalysisoftouchscreenlearningingeneticallydiversemousestrains
AT robertwwilliams strainsandstressorsananalysisoftouchscreenlearningingeneticallydiversemousestrains
AT andrewholmes strainsandstressorsananalysisoftouchscreenlearningingeneticallydiversemousestrains