Where and what? Frugivory is associated with more efficient foraging in three semi-free ranging primate species
Foraging in seasonal environments can be cognitively challenging. Comparative studies have associated brain size with a frugivorous diet. We investigated how fruit distribution (where) and preference (what) affect foraging decisions in three semi-free ranging primate species with different degrees o...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Royal Society
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.181722 |
_version_ | 1819161495480565760 |
---|---|
author | Cinzia Trapanese Benjamin Robira Giordana Tonachella Silvia di Gristina Hélène Meunier Shelly Masi |
author_facet | Cinzia Trapanese Benjamin Robira Giordana Tonachella Silvia di Gristina Hélène Meunier Shelly Masi |
author_sort | Cinzia Trapanese |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Foraging in seasonal environments can be cognitively challenging. Comparative studies have associated brain size with a frugivorous diet. We investigated how fruit distribution (where) and preference (what) affect foraging decisions in three semi-free ranging primate species with different degrees of frugivory: Macaca tonkeana (Nindiv = 5; Ntrials = 430), M. fascicularis (Nindiv = 3; Ntrials = 168) and Sapajus apella (Nindiv = 6; Ntrials = 288). We used 36 boxes fixed on trees and filled with highly and less preferred fruits with different (weekly) spatio-temporal distributions. Individuals were tested in two conditions: (1) same fruit provided concurrently in the same quantity but in a scattered and in a clumped distribution, (2) highly preferred fruit was scattered while the less preferred was clumped. Generally, primates preferred feeding first on the boxes of the clumped distribution in both conditions, with the more frugivorous species at a higher degree than the less frugivorous species in condition (1), but not (2). Therefore, what fruit was available changed the foraging decisions of the more frugivorous species who also engaged more in goal-directed travel. When feeding on preferred fruit, primates probably maximized foraging efficiency regardless of their degree of frugivory. Our findings emphasize that the food type and distribution may be a preponderant driver in cognitive evolution. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T17:13:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f85807ac61fa4aa3a09d22f613fdba4c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2054-5703 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T17:13:15Z |
publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | Article |
series | Royal Society Open Science |
spelling | doaj.art-f85807ac61fa4aa3a09d22f613fdba4c2022-12-21T18:19:01ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032019-05-016510.1098/rsos.181722181722Where and what? Frugivory is associated with more efficient foraging in three semi-free ranging primate speciesCinzia TrapaneseBenjamin RobiraGiordana TonachellaSilvia di GristinaHélène MeunierShelly MasiForaging in seasonal environments can be cognitively challenging. Comparative studies have associated brain size with a frugivorous diet. We investigated how fruit distribution (where) and preference (what) affect foraging decisions in three semi-free ranging primate species with different degrees of frugivory: Macaca tonkeana (Nindiv = 5; Ntrials = 430), M. fascicularis (Nindiv = 3; Ntrials = 168) and Sapajus apella (Nindiv = 6; Ntrials = 288). We used 36 boxes fixed on trees and filled with highly and less preferred fruits with different (weekly) spatio-temporal distributions. Individuals were tested in two conditions: (1) same fruit provided concurrently in the same quantity but in a scattered and in a clumped distribution, (2) highly preferred fruit was scattered while the less preferred was clumped. Generally, primates preferred feeding first on the boxes of the clumped distribution in both conditions, with the more frugivorous species at a higher degree than the less frugivorous species in condition (1), but not (2). Therefore, what fruit was available changed the foraging decisions of the more frugivorous species who also engaged more in goal-directed travel. When feeding on preferred fruit, primates probably maximized foraging efficiency regardless of their degree of frugivory. Our findings emphasize that the food type and distribution may be a preponderant driver in cognitive evolution.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.181722primatesforaging decisionsfrugivoryfood distributionfood preference |
spellingShingle | Cinzia Trapanese Benjamin Robira Giordana Tonachella Silvia di Gristina Hélène Meunier Shelly Masi Where and what? Frugivory is associated with more efficient foraging in three semi-free ranging primate species Royal Society Open Science primates foraging decisions frugivory food distribution food preference |
title | Where and what? Frugivory is associated with more efficient foraging in three semi-free ranging primate species |
title_full | Where and what? Frugivory is associated with more efficient foraging in three semi-free ranging primate species |
title_fullStr | Where and what? Frugivory is associated with more efficient foraging in three semi-free ranging primate species |
title_full_unstemmed | Where and what? Frugivory is associated with more efficient foraging in three semi-free ranging primate species |
title_short | Where and what? Frugivory is associated with more efficient foraging in three semi-free ranging primate species |
title_sort | where and what frugivory is associated with more efficient foraging in three semi free ranging primate species |
topic | primates foraging decisions frugivory food distribution food preference |
url | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.181722 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cinziatrapanese whereandwhatfrugivoryisassociatedwithmoreefficientforaginginthreesemifreerangingprimatespecies AT benjaminrobira whereandwhatfrugivoryisassociatedwithmoreefficientforaginginthreesemifreerangingprimatespecies AT giordanatonachella whereandwhatfrugivoryisassociatedwithmoreefficientforaginginthreesemifreerangingprimatespecies AT silviadigristina whereandwhatfrugivoryisassociatedwithmoreefficientforaginginthreesemifreerangingprimatespecies AT helenemeunier whereandwhatfrugivoryisassociatedwithmoreefficientforaginginthreesemifreerangingprimatespecies AT shellymasi whereandwhatfrugivoryisassociatedwithmoreefficientforaginginthreesemifreerangingprimatespecies |