Litter Accumulation and Water Retention Characteristics of Different Stands of Tropical Rainforest in Hainan

As the final layer for precipitation interception in forests, the litter layer is crucial to the vertical structure of forest ecosystems, situated between the forest vegetation and soil layers. Exploring the litter accumulation and water retention characteristics in different tropical rainforest sta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng Siyuan, Chen Qiaoyan, Qiao Dong, Dai Licong
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Committee of Tropical Geography 2024-04-01
Series:Redai dili
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rddl.com.cn/CN/10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003853
_version_ 1797203404936708096
author Cheng Siyuan
Chen Qiaoyan
Qiao Dong
Dai Licong
author_facet Cheng Siyuan
Chen Qiaoyan
Qiao Dong
Dai Licong
author_sort Cheng Siyuan
collection DOAJ
description As the final layer for precipitation interception in forests, the litter layer is crucial to the vertical structure of forest ecosystems, situated between the forest vegetation and soil layers. Exploring the litter accumulation and water retention characteristics in different tropical rainforest stands is essential for assessing their water conservation functions. This study focused on three forest stands (primary forest, secondary forest, and rubber plantation) within Qixianling Hot Springs National Forest Park in Hainan, China. The immersion method was used to measure litter accumulation and water retention characteristics, exploring variations among these forest stands. Results revealed (1) significant differences in litter accumulation among the stands, with the primary forest having the highest litter accumulation (2.791 t/hm2), followed by the secondary forest (2.077 t/hm2) and rubber plantation (1.660 t/hm2). Litter moisture content followed the order: primary forest (57.57%) > secondary forest (48.33%) > rubber plantation (46.44%). (2) Regarding water retention and water retention rate, both primary and secondary forests showed an increasing trend with immersion time, with the primary forest exhibiting higher water retention and retention rates than the secondary forest. In contrast, rubber plantations showed no clear trends in water retention or retention rates over time. The relation between litter water absorption rate and immersion time followed a well-fitted power function. The maximum water retention capacities were in the order of primary forest (8.041 t/hm2) > secondary forest (6.251 t/hm2) > rubber plantation (4.896 t/hm2). (3) In terms of water absorption and water loss rates, the rubber plantation had the highest water loss rate, followed by the secondary forest and the primary forest. The maximum water loss was observed in the primary forest (5.225 t/hm2) > secondary forest (4.626 t/hm2) > rubber plantation (4.079 t/hm2), and the maximum water loss rates followed the order: rubber plantation (246.319%) > secondary forest (222.649%) > primary forest (189.748%). The forest litter layer's water retention capacity and storage are closely related, with larger litter reserves correlating with greater water retention. Therefore, among the three forest types, the maximum and effective water interception capacities exhibited the following trend: primary forest > secondary forest > rubber plantation. The maximum and effective interception rates show the pattern: primary forests ≈ rubber plantations > secondary forests. The water conservation function of litter is reflected in its water retention capacity and rate of water loss. Given that primary forests exhibit a higher water retention capacity and lower water loss rates, litter accumulation in primary forests is more conducive to forest water conservation functions. Hence, future efforts should focus on protecting litter from primary forests. Conversely, the litter in rubber plantations tends to have a higher rate of water loss, resulting in poorer water conservation. Therefore, future considerations should include planting understory vegetation in rubber plantations to enhance litter water-conservation capabilities and prevent soil erosion. These findings provide crucial theoretical guidance for forest management and the enhancement of water conservation in tropical regions.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:18:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f89016f29bdd4adca68d400896ba9d30
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1001-5221
language zho
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:18:48Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Editorial Committee of Tropical Geography
record_format Article
series Redai dili
spelling doaj.art-f89016f29bdd4adca68d400896ba9d302024-04-17T02:29:30ZzhoEditorial Committee of Tropical GeographyRedai dili1001-52212024-04-0144470070810.13284/j.cnki.rddl.0038531001-5221(2024)04-0700-09Litter Accumulation and Water Retention Characteristics of Different Stands of Tropical Rainforest in HainanCheng SiyuanChen QiaoyanQiao DongDai LicongAs the final layer for precipitation interception in forests, the litter layer is crucial to the vertical structure of forest ecosystems, situated between the forest vegetation and soil layers. Exploring the litter accumulation and water retention characteristics in different tropical rainforest stands is essential for assessing their water conservation functions. This study focused on three forest stands (primary forest, secondary forest, and rubber plantation) within Qixianling Hot Springs National Forest Park in Hainan, China. The immersion method was used to measure litter accumulation and water retention characteristics, exploring variations among these forest stands. Results revealed (1) significant differences in litter accumulation among the stands, with the primary forest having the highest litter accumulation (2.791 t/hm2), followed by the secondary forest (2.077 t/hm2) and rubber plantation (1.660 t/hm2). Litter moisture content followed the order: primary forest (57.57%) > secondary forest (48.33%) > rubber plantation (46.44%). (2) Regarding water retention and water retention rate, both primary and secondary forests showed an increasing trend with immersion time, with the primary forest exhibiting higher water retention and retention rates than the secondary forest. In contrast, rubber plantations showed no clear trends in water retention or retention rates over time. The relation between litter water absorption rate and immersion time followed a well-fitted power function. The maximum water retention capacities were in the order of primary forest (8.041 t/hm2) > secondary forest (6.251 t/hm2) > rubber plantation (4.896 t/hm2). (3) In terms of water absorption and water loss rates, the rubber plantation had the highest water loss rate, followed by the secondary forest and the primary forest. The maximum water loss was observed in the primary forest (5.225 t/hm2) > secondary forest (4.626 t/hm2) > rubber plantation (4.079 t/hm2), and the maximum water loss rates followed the order: rubber plantation (246.319%) > secondary forest (222.649%) > primary forest (189.748%). The forest litter layer's water retention capacity and storage are closely related, with larger litter reserves correlating with greater water retention. Therefore, among the three forest types, the maximum and effective water interception capacities exhibited the following trend: primary forest > secondary forest > rubber plantation. The maximum and effective interception rates show the pattern: primary forests ≈ rubber plantations > secondary forests. The water conservation function of litter is reflected in its water retention capacity and rate of water loss. Given that primary forests exhibit a higher water retention capacity and lower water loss rates, litter accumulation in primary forests is more conducive to forest water conservation functions. Hence, future efforts should focus on protecting litter from primary forests. Conversely, the litter in rubber plantations tends to have a higher rate of water loss, resulting in poorer water conservation. Therefore, future considerations should include planting understory vegetation in rubber plantations to enhance litter water-conservation capabilities and prevent soil erosion. These findings provide crucial theoretical guidance for forest management and the enhancement of water conservation in tropical regions.https://www.rddl.com.cn/CN/10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003853litter storagetropical rainforestwater holding capacitywater absorption rateeffective blocking capacityhainan
spellingShingle Cheng Siyuan
Chen Qiaoyan
Qiao Dong
Dai Licong
Litter Accumulation and Water Retention Characteristics of Different Stands of Tropical Rainforest in Hainan
Redai dili
litter storage
tropical rainforest
water holding capacity
water absorption rate
effective blocking capacity
hainan
title Litter Accumulation and Water Retention Characteristics of Different Stands of Tropical Rainforest in Hainan
title_full Litter Accumulation and Water Retention Characteristics of Different Stands of Tropical Rainforest in Hainan
title_fullStr Litter Accumulation and Water Retention Characteristics of Different Stands of Tropical Rainforest in Hainan
title_full_unstemmed Litter Accumulation and Water Retention Characteristics of Different Stands of Tropical Rainforest in Hainan
title_short Litter Accumulation and Water Retention Characteristics of Different Stands of Tropical Rainforest in Hainan
title_sort litter accumulation and water retention characteristics of different stands of tropical rainforest in hainan
topic litter storage
tropical rainforest
water holding capacity
water absorption rate
effective blocking capacity
hainan
url https://www.rddl.com.cn/CN/10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003853
work_keys_str_mv AT chengsiyuan litteraccumulationandwaterretentioncharacteristicsofdifferentstandsoftropicalrainforestinhainan
AT chenqiaoyan litteraccumulationandwaterretentioncharacteristicsofdifferentstandsoftropicalrainforestinhainan
AT qiaodong litteraccumulationandwaterretentioncharacteristicsofdifferentstandsoftropicalrainforestinhainan
AT dailicong litteraccumulationandwaterretentioncharacteristicsofdifferentstandsoftropicalrainforestinhainan