2182

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: An accurate method to identify bleeding in large populations does not exist. Our goal was to explore bleeding representation in clinical text in order to develop a natural language processing (NLP) approach to automatically identify bleeding events from clinical notes. METH...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rashmee Shah, Benjamin Steinberg, Brian Bucher, Alec Chapman, Donald Lloyd-Jones, Matthew Rondina, Wendy Chapman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866117000607/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156824914657280
author Rashmee Shah
Benjamin Steinberg
Brian Bucher
Alec Chapman
Donald Lloyd-Jones
Matthew Rondina
Wendy Chapman
author_facet Rashmee Shah
Benjamin Steinberg
Brian Bucher
Alec Chapman
Donald Lloyd-Jones
Matthew Rondina
Wendy Chapman
author_sort Rashmee Shah
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: An accurate method to identify bleeding in large populations does not exist. Our goal was to explore bleeding representation in clinical text in order to develop a natural language processing (NLP) approach to automatically identify bleeding events from clinical notes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We used publicly available notes for ICU patients at high risk of bleeding (n=98,586 notes). Two physicians reviewed randomly selected notes and annotated all direct references to bleeding as “bleeding present” (BP) or “bleeding absent” (BA). Annotations were made at the mention level (if 1 specific sentence/phrase indicated BP or BA) and note level (if overall note indicated BP or BA). A third physician adjudicated discordant annotations. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In 120 randomly selected notes, bleeding was mentioned 406 times with 76 distinct words. Inter-annotator agreement was 89% by the last batch of 30 notes. In total, 10 terms accounted for 65% of all bleeding mentions. We aggregated these results into 16 common stems (eg, “hemorr” for hemorrhagic and hemorrhage), which accounted for 90% of all 406 mentions. Of all 120 notes, 60% were classified as BP. The median number of stems was 5 (IQR 2, 9) in BP Versus 0 (IQR 0, 1) in BA notes. Zero bleeding mentions in a note was associated with BA (OR 28, 95% CI 6.5, 127). With 40 true negatives and 2 false negatives, the negative predictive value (NPV) of zero bleeding mentions was 95%. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Few bleeding-related terms are used in clinical practice. Absence of these terms has a high NPV for the absence of bleeding. These results suggest that a high throughput, rules-based NLP tool to identify bleeding is feasible.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:56:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f89abe8d2ac64c86be37942c18bcd77a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:56:29Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-f89abe8d2ac64c86be37942c18bcd77a2023-03-09T12:30:07ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612017-09-011121210.1017/cts.2017.602182Rashmee Shah0Benjamin Steinberg1Brian Bucher2Alec Chapman3Donald Lloyd-Jones4Matthew Rondina5Wendy Chapman6The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USAThe University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USAThe University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USAThe University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USAThe University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USAThe University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USAThe University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USAOBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: An accurate method to identify bleeding in large populations does not exist. Our goal was to explore bleeding representation in clinical text in order to develop a natural language processing (NLP) approach to automatically identify bleeding events from clinical notes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We used publicly available notes for ICU patients at high risk of bleeding (n=98,586 notes). Two physicians reviewed randomly selected notes and annotated all direct references to bleeding as “bleeding present” (BP) or “bleeding absent” (BA). Annotations were made at the mention level (if 1 specific sentence/phrase indicated BP or BA) and note level (if overall note indicated BP or BA). A third physician adjudicated discordant annotations. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In 120 randomly selected notes, bleeding was mentioned 406 times with 76 distinct words. Inter-annotator agreement was 89% by the last batch of 30 notes. In total, 10 terms accounted for 65% of all bleeding mentions. We aggregated these results into 16 common stems (eg, “hemorr” for hemorrhagic and hemorrhage), which accounted for 90% of all 406 mentions. Of all 120 notes, 60% were classified as BP. The median number of stems was 5 (IQR 2, 9) in BP Versus 0 (IQR 0, 1) in BA notes. Zero bleeding mentions in a note was associated with BA (OR 28, 95% CI 6.5, 127). With 40 true negatives and 2 false negatives, the negative predictive value (NPV) of zero bleeding mentions was 95%. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Few bleeding-related terms are used in clinical practice. Absence of these terms has a high NPV for the absence of bleeding. These results suggest that a high throughput, rules-based NLP tool to identify bleeding is feasible.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866117000607/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Rashmee Shah
Benjamin Steinberg
Brian Bucher
Alec Chapman
Donald Lloyd-Jones
Matthew Rondina
Wendy Chapman
2182
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
title 2182
title_full 2182
title_fullStr 2182
title_full_unstemmed 2182
title_short 2182
title_sort 2182
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866117000607/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT rashmeeshah 2182
AT benjaminsteinberg 2182
AT brianbucher 2182
AT alecchapman 2182
AT donaldlloydjones 2182
AT matthewrondina 2182
AT wendychapman 2182