Historical and Modern Responses to Plague Epidemics: What Lessons Can Be Drawn from Case Studies in France, the United States and Madagascar?

Despite its long history, plague has not been an internationally significant disease since the mid-twentieth century, and it has attracted minimal modern critical attention. Strategies for treating plague are generally outdated and of limited effectiveness. However, plague remains endemic to a few d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hugo Carnell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Manchester University Press 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.manchesteropenhive.com/view/journals/jha/4/2/article-p3.xml
_version_ 1828116497654874112
author Hugo Carnell
author_facet Hugo Carnell
author_sort Hugo Carnell
collection DOAJ
description Despite its long history, plague has not been an internationally significant disease since the mid-twentieth century, and it has attracted minimal modern critical attention. Strategies for treating plague are generally outdated and of limited effectiveness. However, plague remains endemic to a few developing nations, most prominently Madagascar. The outbreak of a major plague epidemic across several Madagascan urban areas in 2017 has sparked a wider discourse about the necessity of improving global preparedness for a potential future plague pandemic. Beyond updating treatment modalities, a key aspect of improving preparedness for such a pandemic involves a process of sophisticated review of historical public health responses to plague epidemics. As part of this process, this article outlines and compares public health responses to three separate epidemics from the early modern era onwards: Marseille in 1720–22, San Francisco in 1900–04 and Madagascar in 2017. Based on this process, it identifies three key themes common to successful responses: (1) clear, effective and minimally bureaucratic public health protocols; (2) an emphasis on combating plague denialism by gaining the trust and cooperation of the affected population; and (3) the long-term suppression of plague through the minimisation of contact between humans and infected small mammals.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:58:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f8ad8b76c338458e891cc6a7f150baba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2515-6411
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:58:54Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Manchester University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
spelling doaj.art-f8ad8b76c338458e891cc6a7f150baba2022-12-22T04:23:01ZengManchester University PressJournal of Humanitarian Affairs2515-64112022-12-014231110.7227/JHA.085Historical and Modern Responses to Plague Epidemics: What Lessons Can Be Drawn from Case Studies in France, the United States and Madagascar?Hugo Carnell0University of MaltaDespite its long history, plague has not been an internationally significant disease since the mid-twentieth century, and it has attracted minimal modern critical attention. Strategies for treating plague are generally outdated and of limited effectiveness. However, plague remains endemic to a few developing nations, most prominently Madagascar. The outbreak of a major plague epidemic across several Madagascan urban areas in 2017 has sparked a wider discourse about the necessity of improving global preparedness for a potential future plague pandemic. Beyond updating treatment modalities, a key aspect of improving preparedness for such a pandemic involves a process of sophisticated review of historical public health responses to plague epidemics. As part of this process, this article outlines and compares public health responses to three separate epidemics from the early modern era onwards: Marseille in 1720–22, San Francisco in 1900–04 and Madagascar in 2017. Based on this process, it identifies three key themes common to successful responses: (1) clear, effective and minimally bureaucratic public health protocols; (2) an emphasis on combating plague denialism by gaining the trust and cooperation of the affected population; and (3) the long-term suppression of plague through the minimisation of contact between humans and infected small mammals.https://www.manchesteropenhive.com/view/journals/jha/4/2/article-p3.xmlplagueepidemic controlhistorical public health perspectivesmarseillesan franciscomadagascar
spellingShingle Hugo Carnell
Historical and Modern Responses to Plague Epidemics: What Lessons Can Be Drawn from Case Studies in France, the United States and Madagascar?
Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
plague
epidemic control
historical public health perspectives
marseille
san francisco
madagascar
title Historical and Modern Responses to Plague Epidemics: What Lessons Can Be Drawn from Case Studies in France, the United States and Madagascar?
title_full Historical and Modern Responses to Plague Epidemics: What Lessons Can Be Drawn from Case Studies in France, the United States and Madagascar?
title_fullStr Historical and Modern Responses to Plague Epidemics: What Lessons Can Be Drawn from Case Studies in France, the United States and Madagascar?
title_full_unstemmed Historical and Modern Responses to Plague Epidemics: What Lessons Can Be Drawn from Case Studies in France, the United States and Madagascar?
title_short Historical and Modern Responses to Plague Epidemics: What Lessons Can Be Drawn from Case Studies in France, the United States and Madagascar?
title_sort historical and modern responses to plague epidemics what lessons can be drawn from case studies in france the united states and madagascar
topic plague
epidemic control
historical public health perspectives
marseille
san francisco
madagascar
url https://www.manchesteropenhive.com/view/journals/jha/4/2/article-p3.xml
work_keys_str_mv AT hugocarnell historicalandmodernresponsestoplagueepidemicswhatlessonscanbedrawnfromcasestudiesinfrancetheunitedstatesandmadagascar