The Conjunction Functions of the Particle tolko: A Conjunction Particle vs a Conjunction Analogue

This article considers the conjunction functions of the logical and modal particle tolko. A study into the functioning of logical and modal particles led the author to identify the basic syntactic positions that determine the functional and grammatical status of the lexical units studied: the partic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Akopyan K. S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University 2018-03-01
Series:Слово.ру: балтийский акцент
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.kantiana.ru/slovo/3738/10308/
_version_ 1819117170062262272
author Akopyan K. S.
author_facet Akopyan K. S.
author_sort Akopyan K. S.
collection DOAJ
description This article considers the conjunction functions of the logical and modal particle tolko. A study into the functioning of logical and modal particles led the author to identify the basic syntactic positions that determine the functional and grammatical status of the lexical units studied: the particle, the conjunction particle, and the conjunction analogue. The conjunction behaviour of a particle can be manifested to a greater or lesser degree. The particle/conjunction relation forms a gradient. In an utterance, the lexeme studied fulfils either the primary function of a logical and modal particle or the secondary one of a conjunction. In the latter case, the lexeme becomes a conjunction particle or a conjunction analogue. The author proposes a new method for differentiating between a conjunction particle and a conjunction conjunctive. The analysis of the functions of the lexeme tolko (without considering the temporal meanings) revealed an interesting pattern. The lexeme’s functional semantics of the connector stems from four potential meanings — restrictiveness, adversativeness, concessiveness, and resultativeness. The author identifies the following variants of the lexeme tolko — an adversative- restrictive conjunction particle, an adversative-concessive conjunction analogue, a concessive- resultative conjunction analogue, and a conjunction analogue conveying the meaning of the total result. All these variants have semantic and constructive subtypes.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T05:28:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f8b7029756ab4d15b2ab4ecc4c1c0308
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2225-5346
2686-8989
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T05:28:43Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
record_format Article
series Слово.ру: балтийский акцент
spelling doaj.art-f8b7029756ab4d15b2ab4ecc4c1c03082022-12-21T18:37:30ZengImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityСлово.ру: балтийский акцент2225-53462686-89892018-03-0191294410.5922/2225-5346-2018-1-3The Conjunction Functions of the Particle tolko: A Conjunction Particle vs a Conjunction AnalogueAkopyan K. S. 0Russian-Armenian (Slavonic) University This article considers the conjunction functions of the logical and modal particle tolko. A study into the functioning of logical and modal particles led the author to identify the basic syntactic positions that determine the functional and grammatical status of the lexical units studied: the particle, the conjunction particle, and the conjunction analogue. The conjunction behaviour of a particle can be manifested to a greater or lesser degree. The particle/conjunction relation forms a gradient. In an utterance, the lexeme studied fulfils either the primary function of a logical and modal particle or the secondary one of a conjunction. In the latter case, the lexeme becomes a conjunction particle or a conjunction analogue. The author proposes a new method for differentiating between a conjunction particle and a conjunction conjunctive. The analysis of the functions of the lexeme tolko (without considering the temporal meanings) revealed an interesting pattern. The lexeme’s functional semantics of the connector stems from four potential meanings — restrictiveness, adversativeness, concessiveness, and resultativeness. The author identifies the following variants of the lexeme tolko — an adversative- restrictive conjunction particle, an adversative-concessive conjunction analogue, a concessive- resultative conjunction analogue, and a conjunction analogue conveying the meaning of the total result. All these variants have semantic and constructive subtypes.https://journals.kantiana.ru/slovo/3738/10308/logical-modal particlesconjunction functions of particlesparticle tolkoconjunction particlecnjucntion analoguerestrictivenessadversativenessconcessivenessresultativeness
spellingShingle Akopyan K. S.
The Conjunction Functions of the Particle tolko: A Conjunction Particle vs a Conjunction Analogue
Слово.ру: балтийский акцент
logical-modal particles
conjunction functions of particles
particle tolko
conjunction particle
cnjucntion analogue
restrictiveness
adversativeness
concessiveness
resultativeness
title The Conjunction Functions of the Particle tolko: A Conjunction Particle vs a Conjunction Analogue
title_full The Conjunction Functions of the Particle tolko: A Conjunction Particle vs a Conjunction Analogue
title_fullStr The Conjunction Functions of the Particle tolko: A Conjunction Particle vs a Conjunction Analogue
title_full_unstemmed The Conjunction Functions of the Particle tolko: A Conjunction Particle vs a Conjunction Analogue
title_short The Conjunction Functions of the Particle tolko: A Conjunction Particle vs a Conjunction Analogue
title_sort conjunction functions of the particle tolko a conjunction particle vs a conjunction analogue
topic logical-modal particles
conjunction functions of particles
particle tolko
conjunction particle
cnjucntion analogue
restrictiveness
adversativeness
concessiveness
resultativeness
url https://journals.kantiana.ru/slovo/3738/10308/
work_keys_str_mv AT akopyanks theconjunctionfunctionsoftheparticletolkoaconjunctionparticlevsaconjunctionanalogue
AT akopyanks conjunctionfunctionsoftheparticletolkoaconjunctionparticlevsaconjunctionanalogue