Hydrogen as a Maritime Fuel–Can Experiences with LNG Be Transferred to Hydrogen Systems?
As the use of fossil fuels becomes more and more restricted there is a need for alternative fuels also at sea. For short sea distance travel purposes, batteries may be a solution. However, for longer distances, when there is no possibility of recharging at sea, batteries do not have sufficient capac...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/7/743 |
_version_ | 1827687476754382848 |
---|---|
author | Ann Rigmor Nerheim Vilmar Æsøy Finn Tore Holmeset |
author_facet | Ann Rigmor Nerheim Vilmar Æsøy Finn Tore Holmeset |
author_sort | Ann Rigmor Nerheim |
collection | DOAJ |
description | As the use of fossil fuels becomes more and more restricted there is a need for alternative fuels also at sea. For short sea distance travel purposes, batteries may be a solution. However, for longer distances, when there is no possibility of recharging at sea, batteries do not have sufficient capacity yet. Several projects have demonstrated the use of compressed hydrogen (CH<sub>2</sub>) as a fuel for road transport. The experience with hydrogen as a maritime fuel is very limited. In this paper, the similarities and differences between liquefied hydrogen (LH<sub>2</sub>) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a maritime fuel will be discussed based on literature data of their properties and our system knowledge. The advantages and disadvantages of the two fuels will be examined with respect to use as a maritime fuel. Our objective is to discuss if and how hydrogen could replace fossil fuels on long distance sea voyages. Due to the low temperature of LH<sub>2</sub> and wide flammability range in air these systems have more challenges related to storage and processing onboard than LNG. These factors result in higher investment costs. All this may also imply challenges for the LH<sub>2</sub> supply chain. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:35:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f8b9da16cc4e433396b771702b751741 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2077-1312 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:35:52Z |
publishDate | 2021-07-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
spelling | doaj.art-f8b9da16cc4e433396b771702b7517412023-11-22T04:09:02ZengMDPI AGJournal of Marine Science and Engineering2077-13122021-07-019774310.3390/jmse9070743Hydrogen as a Maritime Fuel–Can Experiences with LNG Be Transferred to Hydrogen Systems?Ann Rigmor Nerheim0Vilmar Æsøy1Finn Tore Holmeset2Department of Ocean Operations and Civil Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 6025 Ålesund, NorwayDepartment of Ocean Operations and Civil Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 6025 Ålesund, NorwayDepartment of Ocean Operations and Civil Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 6025 Ålesund, NorwayAs the use of fossil fuels becomes more and more restricted there is a need for alternative fuels also at sea. For short sea distance travel purposes, batteries may be a solution. However, for longer distances, when there is no possibility of recharging at sea, batteries do not have sufficient capacity yet. Several projects have demonstrated the use of compressed hydrogen (CH<sub>2</sub>) as a fuel for road transport. The experience with hydrogen as a maritime fuel is very limited. In this paper, the similarities and differences between liquefied hydrogen (LH<sub>2</sub>) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a maritime fuel will be discussed based on literature data of their properties and our system knowledge. The advantages and disadvantages of the two fuels will be examined with respect to use as a maritime fuel. Our objective is to discuss if and how hydrogen could replace fossil fuels on long distance sea voyages. Due to the low temperature of LH<sub>2</sub> and wide flammability range in air these systems have more challenges related to storage and processing onboard than LNG. These factors result in higher investment costs. All this may also imply challenges for the LH<sub>2</sub> supply chain.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/7/743hydrogensafetycryogenicLNGmaritimefuel |
spellingShingle | Ann Rigmor Nerheim Vilmar Æsøy Finn Tore Holmeset Hydrogen as a Maritime Fuel–Can Experiences with LNG Be Transferred to Hydrogen Systems? Journal of Marine Science and Engineering hydrogen safety cryogenic LNG maritime fuel |
title | Hydrogen as a Maritime Fuel–Can Experiences with LNG Be Transferred to Hydrogen Systems? |
title_full | Hydrogen as a Maritime Fuel–Can Experiences with LNG Be Transferred to Hydrogen Systems? |
title_fullStr | Hydrogen as a Maritime Fuel–Can Experiences with LNG Be Transferred to Hydrogen Systems? |
title_full_unstemmed | Hydrogen as a Maritime Fuel–Can Experiences with LNG Be Transferred to Hydrogen Systems? |
title_short | Hydrogen as a Maritime Fuel–Can Experiences with LNG Be Transferred to Hydrogen Systems? |
title_sort | hydrogen as a maritime fuel can experiences with lng be transferred to hydrogen systems |
topic | hydrogen safety cryogenic LNG maritime fuel |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/7/743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT annrigmornerheim hydrogenasamaritimefuelcanexperienceswithlngbetransferredtohydrogensystems AT vilmaræsøy hydrogenasamaritimefuelcanexperienceswithlngbetransferredtohydrogensystems AT finntoreholmeset hydrogenasamaritimefuelcanexperienceswithlngbetransferredtohydrogensystems |