Quasi‐static response of a bottom‐fixed wind turbine subject to various incident wind fields

Abstract In the design of offshore wind farms the simulated dynamic response of the wind turbine structure includes loading from turbulent wind. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard for wind turbine design recommends both the Mann spectral tensor model and the Kaimal spectral...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Astrid Nybø, Finn Gunnar Nielsen, Marte Godvik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-12-01
Series:Wind Energy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2642
_version_ 1829489326549893120
author Astrid Nybø
Finn Gunnar Nielsen
Marte Godvik
author_facet Astrid Nybø
Finn Gunnar Nielsen
Marte Godvik
author_sort Astrid Nybø
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In the design of offshore wind farms the simulated dynamic response of the wind turbine structure includes loading from turbulent wind. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard for wind turbine design recommends both the Mann spectral tensor model and the Kaimal spectral model combined with an exponential coherence formulation. These models give deviating wind loads. This study compares these two models to a large eddy simulations model and a model based on offshore wind measurements. The comparisons are performed for three situations, covering unstable, neutral and stable atmospheric conditions. The impact of the differences in the wind fields on the quasi‐static response of a large bottom‐fixed wind turbine is investigated. The findings are supported by an assessment of the impact of individual wind characteristics on the turbine responses. The wind model based on measurements causes high tower bottom and blade root flapwise bending moments due to a high wind load at very low frequencies. Low and negative horizontal coherence is obtained using the Mann spectral tensor model. This causes relatively large yaw moments as compared to the results using the other wind models. The largest differences in response are seen in the stable situation. We furthermore show that the quasi‐static wind load has great impact on the total damage equivalent moments of the structure. From the results, we conclude that in the design of large offshore wind turbines one should carefully consider the structure of the turbulent wind. Further, longer simulations than recommended by the standards should be used to reduce uncertainty in estimated response.
first_indexed 2024-12-15T00:05:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f8bb572dffd24f49bf55f5ea7b5fbb17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1095-4244
1099-1824
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-15T00:05:47Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wind Energy
spelling doaj.art-f8bb572dffd24f49bf55f5ea7b5fbb172022-12-21T22:42:44ZengWileyWind Energy1095-42441099-18242021-12-0124121482150010.1002/we.2642Quasi‐static response of a bottom‐fixed wind turbine subject to various incident wind fieldsAstrid Nybø0Finn Gunnar Nielsen1Marte Godvik2Geophysical Institute and Bergen Offshore Wind Centre (BOW) University of Bergen Bergen NorwayGeophysical Institute and Bergen Offshore Wind Centre (BOW) University of Bergen Bergen NorwayGeophysical Institute and Bergen Offshore Wind Centre (BOW) University of Bergen Bergen NorwayAbstract In the design of offshore wind farms the simulated dynamic response of the wind turbine structure includes loading from turbulent wind. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard for wind turbine design recommends both the Mann spectral tensor model and the Kaimal spectral model combined with an exponential coherence formulation. These models give deviating wind loads. This study compares these two models to a large eddy simulations model and a model based on offshore wind measurements. The comparisons are performed for three situations, covering unstable, neutral and stable atmospheric conditions. The impact of the differences in the wind fields on the quasi‐static response of a large bottom‐fixed wind turbine is investigated. The findings are supported by an assessment of the impact of individual wind characteristics on the turbine responses. The wind model based on measurements causes high tower bottom and blade root flapwise bending moments due to a high wind load at very low frequencies. Low and negative horizontal coherence is obtained using the Mann spectral tensor model. This causes relatively large yaw moments as compared to the results using the other wind models. The largest differences in response are seen in the stable situation. We furthermore show that the quasi‐static wind load has great impact on the total damage equivalent moments of the structure. From the results, we conclude that in the design of large offshore wind turbines one should carefully consider the structure of the turbulent wind. Further, longer simulations than recommended by the standards should be used to reduce uncertainty in estimated response.https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2642coherencedamage equivalent momentsoffshore wind turbinesquasi‐static responsespectral responseturbulence models
spellingShingle Astrid Nybø
Finn Gunnar Nielsen
Marte Godvik
Quasi‐static response of a bottom‐fixed wind turbine subject to various incident wind fields
Wind Energy
coherence
damage equivalent moments
offshore wind turbines
quasi‐static response
spectral response
turbulence models
title Quasi‐static response of a bottom‐fixed wind turbine subject to various incident wind fields
title_full Quasi‐static response of a bottom‐fixed wind turbine subject to various incident wind fields
title_fullStr Quasi‐static response of a bottom‐fixed wind turbine subject to various incident wind fields
title_full_unstemmed Quasi‐static response of a bottom‐fixed wind turbine subject to various incident wind fields
title_short Quasi‐static response of a bottom‐fixed wind turbine subject to various incident wind fields
title_sort quasi static response of a bottom fixed wind turbine subject to various incident wind fields
topic coherence
damage equivalent moments
offshore wind turbines
quasi‐static response
spectral response
turbulence models
url https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2642
work_keys_str_mv AT astridnybø quasistaticresponseofabottomfixedwindturbinesubjecttovariousincidentwindfields
AT finngunnarnielsen quasistaticresponseofabottomfixedwindturbinesubjecttovariousincidentwindfields
AT martegodvik quasistaticresponseofabottomfixedwindturbinesubjecttovariousincidentwindfields