Comparing Inertial Measurement Units to Markerless Video Analysis for Movement Symmetry in Quarter Horses

Background: With an increasing number of systems for quantifying lameness-related movement asymmetry, between-system comparisons under non-laboratory conditions are important for multi-centre or referral-level studies. This study compares an artificial intelligence video app to a validated inertial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thilo Pfau, Kiki Landsbergen, Brittany L. Davis, Olivia Kenny, Nicole Kernot, Nina Rochard, Marion Porte-Proust, Holly Sparks, Yuji Takahashi, Kasara Toth, W. Michael Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/20/8414
_version_ 1797572365394116608
author Thilo Pfau
Kiki Landsbergen
Brittany L. Davis
Olivia Kenny
Nicole Kernot
Nina Rochard
Marion Porte-Proust
Holly Sparks
Yuji Takahashi
Kasara Toth
W. Michael Scott
author_facet Thilo Pfau
Kiki Landsbergen
Brittany L. Davis
Olivia Kenny
Nicole Kernot
Nina Rochard
Marion Porte-Proust
Holly Sparks
Yuji Takahashi
Kasara Toth
W. Michael Scott
author_sort Thilo Pfau
collection DOAJ
description Background: With an increasing number of systems for quantifying lameness-related movement asymmetry, between-system comparisons under non-laboratory conditions are important for multi-centre or referral-level studies. This study compares an artificial intelligence video app to a validated inertial measurement unit (IMU) gait analysis system in a specific group of horses. Methods: Twenty-two reining Quarter horses were equipped with nine body-mounted IMUs while being videoed with a smartphone app. Both systems quantified head and pelvic movement symmetry during in-hand trot (hard/soft ground) and on the lunge (left/right rein, soft ground). Proportional limits of agreement (pLoA) were established. Results: Widths of pLoA were larger for head movement (29% to 50% in-hand; 22% to 38% on lunge) than for pelvic movement (13% to 24% in-hand; 14% to 24% on lunge). Conclusion: The between-system pLoAs exceed current “lameness thresholds” aimed at identifying the affected limb(s) in lame horses. They also exceed published limits of agreement for stride-matched data but are similar to repeatability values and “lameness thresholds” from “non-lame” horses. This is encouraging for multi-centre studies and referral-level veterinary practice. The narrower pLoA values for pelvic movement asymmetry are particularly encouraging, given the difficulty of grading hind limb lameness “by eye”.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:55:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f8de71a4f2b343c69f129222415219a1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:55:14Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-f8de71a4f2b343c69f129222415219a12023-11-19T18:02:33ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-10-012320841410.3390/s23208414Comparing Inertial Measurement Units to Markerless Video Analysis for Movement Symmetry in Quarter HorsesThilo Pfau0Kiki Landsbergen1Brittany L. Davis2Olivia Kenny3Nicole Kernot4Nina Rochard5Marion Porte-Proust6Holly Sparks7Yuji Takahashi8Kasara Toth9W. Michael Scott10Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaSchool of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, North Wagga, NSW 2650, AustraliaEcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 31300 Toulouse, FranceEcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 31300 Toulouse, FranceFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaBackground: With an increasing number of systems for quantifying lameness-related movement asymmetry, between-system comparisons under non-laboratory conditions are important for multi-centre or referral-level studies. This study compares an artificial intelligence video app to a validated inertial measurement unit (IMU) gait analysis system in a specific group of horses. Methods: Twenty-two reining Quarter horses were equipped with nine body-mounted IMUs while being videoed with a smartphone app. Both systems quantified head and pelvic movement symmetry during in-hand trot (hard/soft ground) and on the lunge (left/right rein, soft ground). Proportional limits of agreement (pLoA) were established. Results: Widths of pLoA were larger for head movement (29% to 50% in-hand; 22% to 38% on lunge) than for pelvic movement (13% to 24% in-hand; 14% to 24% on lunge). Conclusion: The between-system pLoAs exceed current “lameness thresholds” aimed at identifying the affected limb(s) in lame horses. They also exceed published limits of agreement for stride-matched data but are similar to repeatability values and “lameness thresholds” from “non-lame” horses. This is encouraging for multi-centre studies and referral-level veterinary practice. The narrower pLoA values for pelvic movement asymmetry are particularly encouraging, given the difficulty of grading hind limb lameness “by eye”.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/20/8414horsemovement symmetryinertial measurement unitmarkerless trackingartificial intelligencelameness
spellingShingle Thilo Pfau
Kiki Landsbergen
Brittany L. Davis
Olivia Kenny
Nicole Kernot
Nina Rochard
Marion Porte-Proust
Holly Sparks
Yuji Takahashi
Kasara Toth
W. Michael Scott
Comparing Inertial Measurement Units to Markerless Video Analysis for Movement Symmetry in Quarter Horses
Sensors
horse
movement symmetry
inertial measurement unit
markerless tracking
artificial intelligence
lameness
title Comparing Inertial Measurement Units to Markerless Video Analysis for Movement Symmetry in Quarter Horses
title_full Comparing Inertial Measurement Units to Markerless Video Analysis for Movement Symmetry in Quarter Horses
title_fullStr Comparing Inertial Measurement Units to Markerless Video Analysis for Movement Symmetry in Quarter Horses
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Inertial Measurement Units to Markerless Video Analysis for Movement Symmetry in Quarter Horses
title_short Comparing Inertial Measurement Units to Markerless Video Analysis for Movement Symmetry in Quarter Horses
title_sort comparing inertial measurement units to markerless video analysis for movement symmetry in quarter horses
topic horse
movement symmetry
inertial measurement unit
markerless tracking
artificial intelligence
lameness
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/20/8414
work_keys_str_mv AT thilopfau comparinginertialmeasurementunitstomarkerlessvideoanalysisformovementsymmetryinquarterhorses
AT kikilandsbergen comparinginertialmeasurementunitstomarkerlessvideoanalysisformovementsymmetryinquarterhorses
AT brittanyldavis comparinginertialmeasurementunitstomarkerlessvideoanalysisformovementsymmetryinquarterhorses
AT oliviakenny comparinginertialmeasurementunitstomarkerlessvideoanalysisformovementsymmetryinquarterhorses
AT nicolekernot comparinginertialmeasurementunitstomarkerlessvideoanalysisformovementsymmetryinquarterhorses
AT ninarochard comparinginertialmeasurementunitstomarkerlessvideoanalysisformovementsymmetryinquarterhorses
AT marionporteproust comparinginertialmeasurementunitstomarkerlessvideoanalysisformovementsymmetryinquarterhorses
AT hollysparks comparinginertialmeasurementunitstomarkerlessvideoanalysisformovementsymmetryinquarterhorses
AT yujitakahashi comparinginertialmeasurementunitstomarkerlessvideoanalysisformovementsymmetryinquarterhorses
AT kasaratoth comparinginertialmeasurementunitstomarkerlessvideoanalysisformovementsymmetryinquarterhorses
AT wmichaelscott comparinginertialmeasurementunitstomarkerlessvideoanalysisformovementsymmetryinquarterhorses