On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensembles

<p>The Earth's equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) to a doubling of atmospheric <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>, along with the transient climate response (TCR) and greenhouse gas emissions pathways, determines the amount of future wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. M. Flynn, T. Mauritsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-07-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/7829/2020/acp-20-7829-2020.pdf
_version_ 1819227050672652288
author C. M. Flynn
T. Mauritsen
author_facet C. M. Flynn
T. Mauritsen
author_sort C. M. Flynn
collection DOAJ
description <p>The Earth's equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) to a doubling of atmospheric <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>, along with the transient climate response (TCR) and greenhouse gas emissions pathways, determines the amount of future warming. Coupled climate models have in the past been important tools to estimate and understand ECS. ECS estimated from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models lies between 2.0 and 4.7&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span> (mean of 3.2&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span>), whereas in the latest CMIP6 the spread has increased to 1.8–5.5&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span> (mean of 3.7&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span>), with 5 out of 25 models exceeding 5&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span>. It is thus pertinent to understand the causes underlying this shift. Here we compare the CMIP5 and CMIP6 model ensembles and find a systematic shift between CMIP eras to be unexplained as a process of random sampling from modeled forcing and feedback distributions. Instead, shortwave feedbacks shift towards more positive values, in particular over the Southern Ocean, driving the shift towards larger ECS values in many of the models. These results suggest that changes in model treatment of mixed-phase cloud processes and changes to Antarctic sea ice representation are likely causes of the shift towards larger ECS. Somewhat surprisingly, CMIP6 models exhibit less historical warming than CMIP5 models, despite an increase in TCR between CMIP eras (mean TCR increased from 1.7 to 1.9&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span>). The evolution of the warming suggests, however, that several of the CMIP6 models apply too strong aerosol cooling, resulting in too weak mid-20th century warming compared to the instrumental record.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-23T10:35:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f8df15dddb74434a83137b7abd878971
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T10:35:13Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-f8df15dddb74434a83137b7abd8789712022-12-21T17:50:19ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242020-07-01207829784210.5194/acp-20-7829-2020On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensemblesC. M. FlynnT. Mauritsen<p>The Earth's equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) to a doubling of atmospheric <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>, along with the transient climate response (TCR) and greenhouse gas emissions pathways, determines the amount of future warming. Coupled climate models have in the past been important tools to estimate and understand ECS. ECS estimated from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models lies between 2.0 and 4.7&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span> (mean of 3.2&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span>), whereas in the latest CMIP6 the spread has increased to 1.8–5.5&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span> (mean of 3.7&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span>), with 5 out of 25 models exceeding 5&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span>. It is thus pertinent to understand the causes underlying this shift. Here we compare the CMIP5 and CMIP6 model ensembles and find a systematic shift between CMIP eras to be unexplained as a process of random sampling from modeled forcing and feedback distributions. Instead, shortwave feedbacks shift towards more positive values, in particular over the Southern Ocean, driving the shift towards larger ECS values in many of the models. These results suggest that changes in model treatment of mixed-phase cloud processes and changes to Antarctic sea ice representation are likely causes of the shift towards larger ECS. Somewhat surprisingly, CMIP6 models exhibit less historical warming than CMIP5 models, despite an increase in TCR between CMIP eras (mean TCR increased from 1.7 to 1.9&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">K</span>). The evolution of the warming suggests, however, that several of the CMIP6 models apply too strong aerosol cooling, resulting in too weak mid-20th century warming compared to the instrumental record.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/7829/2020/acp-20-7829-2020.pdf
spellingShingle C. M. Flynn
T. Mauritsen
On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensembles
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensembles
title_full On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensembles
title_fullStr On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensembles
title_full_unstemmed On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensembles
title_short On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensembles
title_sort on the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensembles
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/7829/2020/acp-20-7829-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cmflynn ontheclimatesensitivityandhistoricalwarmingevolutioninrecentcoupledmodelensembles
AT tmauritsen ontheclimatesensitivityandhistoricalwarmingevolutioninrecentcoupledmodelensembles