Percolation framework reveals limits of privacy in conspiracy, dark web, and blockchain networks

Abstract We consider the limits of privacy based on the knowledge of interactions in anonymous networks. In many anonymous networks, such as blockchain cryptocurrencies, dark web message boards, and other illicit networks, nodes are anonymous to outsiders, however the existence of a link between ind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louis M. Shekhtman, Alon Sela, Shlomo Havlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-05-01
Series:EPJ Data Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00392-8
_version_ 1797811658224041984
author Louis M. Shekhtman
Alon Sela
Shlomo Havlin
author_facet Louis M. Shekhtman
Alon Sela
Shlomo Havlin
author_sort Louis M. Shekhtman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We consider the limits of privacy based on the knowledge of interactions in anonymous networks. In many anonymous networks, such as blockchain cryptocurrencies, dark web message boards, and other illicit networks, nodes are anonymous to outsiders, however the existence of a link between individuals is observable. For example, in blockchains, transactions between anonymous accounts are published openly. Here we consider what happens if one or more individuals in such a network are deanonymized by an outside investigator. These compromised individuals could then potentially leak information about others with whom they interacted, leading to a cascade of nodes’ identities being revealed. We map this scenario to percolation and analyze its consequences on three real anonymous networks—(1) a blockchain transaction network, (2) interactions on the dark web, and (3) a political conspiracy network. We quantify, for different likelihoods of individuals possessing information on their neighbors, p, the fraction of accounts that can be identified in each network. We then estimate the minimum and most probable number of steps to a desired anonymous node, a measure of the effort to deanonymize that node. In all three networks, we find that it is possible to deanonymize a significant fraction of the network ( > 50 % $>50\%$ ) within less than 5 steps for values of p > 0.4 $p>0.4$ . We show how existing measures and approaches from percolation theory can help investigators quantify the chances of deanonymizing individuals, as well as how users can maintain privacy.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T07:25:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f90654cf4d3c4c16bc27f8d134088b29
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2193-1127
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T07:25:54Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series EPJ Data Science
spelling doaj.art-f90654cf4d3c4c16bc27f8d134088b292023-06-04T11:23:36ZengSpringerOpenEPJ Data Science2193-11272023-05-0112111410.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00392-8Percolation framework reveals limits of privacy in conspiracy, dark web, and blockchain networksLouis M. Shekhtman0Alon Sela1Shlomo Havlin2Network Science Institute, Northeastern UniversityDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Ariel UniversityDepartment of Physics, Bar-Ilan UniversityAbstract We consider the limits of privacy based on the knowledge of interactions in anonymous networks. In many anonymous networks, such as blockchain cryptocurrencies, dark web message boards, and other illicit networks, nodes are anonymous to outsiders, however the existence of a link between individuals is observable. For example, in blockchains, transactions between anonymous accounts are published openly. Here we consider what happens if one or more individuals in such a network are deanonymized by an outside investigator. These compromised individuals could then potentially leak information about others with whom they interacted, leading to a cascade of nodes’ identities being revealed. We map this scenario to percolation and analyze its consequences on three real anonymous networks—(1) a blockchain transaction network, (2) interactions on the dark web, and (3) a political conspiracy network. We quantify, for different likelihoods of individuals possessing information on their neighbors, p, the fraction of accounts that can be identified in each network. We then estimate the minimum and most probable number of steps to a desired anonymous node, a measure of the effort to deanonymize that node. In all three networks, we find that it is possible to deanonymize a significant fraction of the network ( > 50 % $>50\%$ ) within less than 5 steps for values of p > 0.4 $p>0.4$ . We show how existing measures and approaches from percolation theory can help investigators quantify the chances of deanonymizing individuals, as well as how users can maintain privacy.https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00392-8PrivacyPercolationDark WebBlockchainSocial networks
spellingShingle Louis M. Shekhtman
Alon Sela
Shlomo Havlin
Percolation framework reveals limits of privacy in conspiracy, dark web, and blockchain networks
EPJ Data Science
Privacy
Percolation
Dark Web
Blockchain
Social networks
title Percolation framework reveals limits of privacy in conspiracy, dark web, and blockchain networks
title_full Percolation framework reveals limits of privacy in conspiracy, dark web, and blockchain networks
title_fullStr Percolation framework reveals limits of privacy in conspiracy, dark web, and blockchain networks
title_full_unstemmed Percolation framework reveals limits of privacy in conspiracy, dark web, and blockchain networks
title_short Percolation framework reveals limits of privacy in conspiracy, dark web, and blockchain networks
title_sort percolation framework reveals limits of privacy in conspiracy dark web and blockchain networks
topic Privacy
Percolation
Dark Web
Blockchain
Social networks
url https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00392-8
work_keys_str_mv AT louismshekhtman percolationframeworkrevealslimitsofprivacyinconspiracydarkwebandblockchainnetworks
AT alonsela percolationframeworkrevealslimitsofprivacyinconspiracydarkwebandblockchainnetworks
AT shlomohavlin percolationframeworkrevealslimitsofprivacyinconspiracydarkwebandblockchainnetworks