The Cost to Consumers of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Product Value Chain Analysis

High-cost abatement measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in the basic commodity industry is known to result in substantial increases in the production costs. Consequently, investments in such measures are lagging behind what is required to make deep emission cuts in line with the Paris Agre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Hörbe Emanuelsson, Filip Johnsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7113
_version_ 1827721104074997760
author Anna Hörbe Emanuelsson
Filip Johnsson
author_facet Anna Hörbe Emanuelsson
Filip Johnsson
author_sort Anna Hörbe Emanuelsson
collection DOAJ
description High-cost abatement measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in the basic commodity industry is known to result in substantial increases in the production costs. Consequently, investments in such measures are lagging behind what is required to make deep emission cuts in line with the Paris Agreement. As high-cost abatement measures (such as Carbon Capture and Storage; CCS) are perceived as expensive for the basic commodity producer, this study investigates the impacts down-stream of the product value chain when assuming full cost pass-through (i.e., the cost increase related to basic commodity production is fully passed on down-stream of the product chain to the end-consumer). We investigate the effects on both costs, by means of a techno-economic assessment, and carbon footprints, using a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), along the product value chain for the case of post-combustion CCS applied to the cement, pulp, Waste-to-Energy (WtE), and refinery industries, towards abating fossil- and process-related emissions and generating negative emissions. Here, we analyse the product value chains that involve cement to a high-speed railway, pulp to a disposable baby diaper, WtE in connection with housing and plastic products, and refineries to different transportation solutions (truck transport and air-freight). The results show that even though the costs for producing basic commodities can increase significantly (200% for cement, 75% for pulp, 230% for heat, and 6–37% for refinery products) when implementing CCS, the increases in prices for end-users are marginal (1% for the railway, 3% for the disposable baby diaper, 1% for the housing, 0.4% for truck transport and 2% for air-freight). Simultaneously, the carbon footprint associated with the end-use may be reduced by up to 36% for the railway, 31% for the diaper, 80% for the housing, and 3–23% for the refinery cases.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T21:17:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f9080a933a5e44599fa236ff0f5abf3a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T21:17:09Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-f9080a933a5e44599fa236ff0f5abf3a2023-11-19T16:22:20ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-10-011620711310.3390/en16207113The Cost to Consumers of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Product Value Chain AnalysisAnna Hörbe Emanuelsson0Filip Johnsson1Division of Energy Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmersplatsen 4, 41296 Gothenburg, SwedenDivision of Energy Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmersplatsen 4, 41296 Gothenburg, SwedenHigh-cost abatement measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in the basic commodity industry is known to result in substantial increases in the production costs. Consequently, investments in such measures are lagging behind what is required to make deep emission cuts in line with the Paris Agreement. As high-cost abatement measures (such as Carbon Capture and Storage; CCS) are perceived as expensive for the basic commodity producer, this study investigates the impacts down-stream of the product value chain when assuming full cost pass-through (i.e., the cost increase related to basic commodity production is fully passed on down-stream of the product chain to the end-consumer). We investigate the effects on both costs, by means of a techno-economic assessment, and carbon footprints, using a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), along the product value chain for the case of post-combustion CCS applied to the cement, pulp, Waste-to-Energy (WtE), and refinery industries, towards abating fossil- and process-related emissions and generating negative emissions. Here, we analyse the product value chains that involve cement to a high-speed railway, pulp to a disposable baby diaper, WtE in connection with housing and plastic products, and refineries to different transportation solutions (truck transport and air-freight). The results show that even though the costs for producing basic commodities can increase significantly (200% for cement, 75% for pulp, 230% for heat, and 6–37% for refinery products) when implementing CCS, the increases in prices for end-users are marginal (1% for the railway, 3% for the disposable baby diaper, 1% for the housing, 0.4% for truck transport and 2% for air-freight). Simultaneously, the carbon footprint associated with the end-use may be reduced by up to 36% for the railway, 31% for the diaper, 80% for the housing, and 3–23% for the refinery cases.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7113value chainsCCSBio-CCScostsemissions reductionscement
spellingShingle Anna Hörbe Emanuelsson
Filip Johnsson
The Cost to Consumers of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Product Value Chain Analysis
Energies
value chains
CCS
Bio-CCS
costs
emissions reductions
cement
title The Cost to Consumers of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Product Value Chain Analysis
title_full The Cost to Consumers of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Product Value Chain Analysis
title_fullStr The Cost to Consumers of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Product Value Chain Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Cost to Consumers of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Product Value Chain Analysis
title_short The Cost to Consumers of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Product Value Chain Analysis
title_sort cost to consumers of carbon capture and storage a product value chain analysis
topic value chains
CCS
Bio-CCS
costs
emissions reductions
cement
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7113
work_keys_str_mv AT annahorbeemanuelsson thecosttoconsumersofcarboncaptureandstorageaproductvaluechainanalysis
AT filipjohnsson thecosttoconsumersofcarboncaptureandstorageaproductvaluechainanalysis
AT annahorbeemanuelsson costtoconsumersofcarboncaptureandstorageaproductvaluechainanalysis
AT filipjohnsson costtoconsumersofcarboncaptureandstorageaproductvaluechainanalysis