Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis

Background and objective: The osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) has an incidence of 7.8/1000 person-years at 55–65 years. At 75 years or older, the incidence increases to 19.6/1000 person-years in females and 5.2–9.3/1000 person-years in males. To solve this problem, percutaneous ve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haowen Dai, Yang Liu, Qing Han, Aobo Zhang, Hao Chen, Yang Qu, Jincheng Wang, Jianwu Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.978917/full
_version_ 1811211876387782656
author Haowen Dai
Yang Liu
Qing Han
Aobo Zhang
Hao Chen
Yang Qu
Jincheng Wang
Jianwu Zhao
author_facet Haowen Dai
Yang Liu
Qing Han
Aobo Zhang
Hao Chen
Yang Qu
Jincheng Wang
Jianwu Zhao
author_sort Haowen Dai
collection DOAJ
description Background and objective: The osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) has an incidence of 7.8/1000 person-years at 55–65 years. At 75 years or older, the incidence increases to 19.6/1000 person-years in females and 5.2–9.3/1000 person-years in males. To solve this problem, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) was developed in recent years and has been widely used in clinical practice to treat OVCF. Are the clinical effects of unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (BPVP) the same? The purpose of this study was to compare biomechanical differences between UPVP and BPVP using finite element analysis.Materials and methods: The heterogeneous assignment finite element (FE) model of T11-L1 was constructed and validated. A compression fracture of the vertebral body was performed at T12. UPVP and BPVP were simulated by the difference in the distribution of bone cement in T12. Stress distributions and maximum von Mises stresses of vertebrae and intervertebral discs were compared. The rate of change of maximum displacement between UPVP and BPVP was evaluated.Results: There were no obvious high-stress concentration regions on the anterior and middle columns of the T12 vertebral body in BPVP. Compared with UPVP, the maximum stress on T11 in BPVP was lower under left/right lateral bending, and the maximum stress on L1 was lower under all loading conditions. For the T12-L1 intervertebral disc, the maximum stress of BPVP was less than that of UPVP. The maximum displacement of T12 after BPVP was less than that after UPVP under the six loading conditions.Conclusion: BPVP could balance the stress of the vertebral body, reduce the maximum stress of the intervertebral disc, and offer advantages in terms of stability compared with UPVP. In summary, BPVP could reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and provide promising clinical effects for patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T05:20:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f9115d5a942641389bb809fc40e71f27
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-4185
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T05:20:49Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
spelling doaj.art-f9115d5a942641389bb809fc40e71f272022-12-22T03:46:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852022-09-011010.3389/fbioe.2022.978917978917Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysisHaowen DaiYang LiuQing HanAobo ZhangHao ChenYang QuJincheng WangJianwu ZhaoBackground and objective: The osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) has an incidence of 7.8/1000 person-years at 55–65 years. At 75 years or older, the incidence increases to 19.6/1000 person-years in females and 5.2–9.3/1000 person-years in males. To solve this problem, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) was developed in recent years and has been widely used in clinical practice to treat OVCF. Are the clinical effects of unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (BPVP) the same? The purpose of this study was to compare biomechanical differences between UPVP and BPVP using finite element analysis.Materials and methods: The heterogeneous assignment finite element (FE) model of T11-L1 was constructed and validated. A compression fracture of the vertebral body was performed at T12. UPVP and BPVP were simulated by the difference in the distribution of bone cement in T12. Stress distributions and maximum von Mises stresses of vertebrae and intervertebral discs were compared. The rate of change of maximum displacement between UPVP and BPVP was evaluated.Results: There were no obvious high-stress concentration regions on the anterior and middle columns of the T12 vertebral body in BPVP. Compared with UPVP, the maximum stress on T11 in BPVP was lower under left/right lateral bending, and the maximum stress on L1 was lower under all loading conditions. For the T12-L1 intervertebral disc, the maximum stress of BPVP was less than that of UPVP. The maximum displacement of T12 after BPVP was less than that after UPVP under the six loading conditions.Conclusion: BPVP could balance the stress of the vertebral body, reduce the maximum stress of the intervertebral disc, and offer advantages in terms of stability compared with UPVP. In summary, BPVP could reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and provide promising clinical effects for patients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.978917/fullvertebroplastyosteoporotic vertebral compression fracturefinite element analysisbone cementbiomechanics
spellingShingle Haowen Dai
Yang Liu
Qing Han
Aobo Zhang
Hao Chen
Yang Qu
Jincheng Wang
Jianwu Zhao
Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
vertebroplasty
osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
finite element analysis
bone cement
biomechanics
title Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures a finite element analysis
topic vertebroplasty
osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
finite element analysis
bone cement
biomechanics
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.978917/full
work_keys_str_mv AT haowendai biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT yangliu biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT qinghan biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT aobozhang biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT haochen biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT yangqu biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT jinchengwang biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT jianwuzhao biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis