Frontex and ‘Algorithmic Discretion’ (Part II)
<p>Part I of this contribution explains how the regulatory design of the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) raises issues in relation to the rule of law principle of legality. Essentially, the ETIAS screening rules algorithm illustrates how automation can lead to what...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | Verfassungsblog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/frontex-and-algorithmic-discretion-part-ii/ |
| _version_ | 1798003236728209408 |
|---|---|
| author | Amanda Musco Eklund |
| author_facet | Amanda Musco Eklund |
| author_sort | Amanda Musco Eklund |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Part I of this contribution explains how the regulatory design of the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) raises issues in relation to the rule of law principle of legality. Essentially, the ETIAS screening rules algorithm illustrates how automation can lead to what I suggest is a new form of arbitrariness. Part II reflects on how these legality issues affect other rule of law principles, including the principle of effective judicial protection. In turn, it raises three accountability issues and calls into question the assumption that the safeguard of manual processing in case of a ‘hit’ is a panacea for all rule of law challenges stemming from this semi-automated decision-making.</p>
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T12:04:40Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f91451646fe445c7bb55a75050085052 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-7044 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T12:04:40Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verfassungsblog |
| spelling | doaj.art-f91451646fe445c7bb55a750500850522022-12-22T04:24:45ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442022-09-012366-7044Frontex and ‘Algorithmic Discretion’ (Part II)Amanda Musco Eklund<p>Part I of this contribution explains how the regulatory design of the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) raises issues in relation to the rule of law principle of legality. Essentially, the ETIAS screening rules algorithm illustrates how automation can lead to what I suggest is a new form of arbitrariness. Part II reflects on how these legality issues affect other rule of law principles, including the principle of effective judicial protection. In turn, it raises three accountability issues and calls into question the assumption that the safeguard of manual processing in case of a ‘hit’ is a panacea for all rule of law challenges stemming from this semi-automated decision-making.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/frontex-and-algorithmic-discretion-part-ii/accountability, Algorithmic Decision-making, border control, ETIAS, Rule of Law |
| spellingShingle | Amanda Musco Eklund Frontex and ‘Algorithmic Discretion’ (Part II) Verfassungsblog accountability, Algorithmic Decision-making, border control, ETIAS, Rule of Law |
| title | Frontex and ‘Algorithmic Discretion’ (Part II) |
| title_full | Frontex and ‘Algorithmic Discretion’ (Part II) |
| title_fullStr | Frontex and ‘Algorithmic Discretion’ (Part II) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Frontex and ‘Algorithmic Discretion’ (Part II) |
| title_short | Frontex and ‘Algorithmic Discretion’ (Part II) |
| title_sort | frontex and algorithmic discretion part ii |
| topic | accountability, Algorithmic Decision-making, border control, ETIAS, Rule of Law |
| url | https://verfassungsblog.de/frontex-and-algorithmic-discretion-part-ii/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amandamuscoeklund frontexandalgorithmicdiscretionpartii |