A systematic tale of two differing reviews: evaluating the evidence on public and private sector quality of primary care in low and middle income countries
Abstract Systematic reviews are powerful tools for summarizing vast amounts of data in controversial areas; but their utility is limited by methodological choices and assumptions. Two systematic reviews of literature on the quality of private sector primary care in low and middle income countries (L...
Main Authors: | Jorge Coarasa, Jishnu Das, Elizabeth Gummerson, Asaf Bitton |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Globalization and Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12992-017-0246-4 |
Similar Items
-
Development of immunohistochemistry services for cancer care in western Kenya: Implications for low- and middle-income countries
by: Kirtika Patel, et al.
Published: (2016-05-01) -
Challenges in primary care for diabetes and hypertension: an observational study of the Kolar district in rural India
by: Dorothy Lall, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Business models for primary health care delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping study of nine social entrepreneurs
by: Lutfi Lokman, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
The use of private-sector contracts for primary health care: theory, evidence and lessons for low-income and middle-income countries
by: Natasha Palmer
Published: (2000-06-01) -
Magnitude and determinants of multimorbidity and health care utilization among patients attending public versus private primary care: a cross-sectional study from Odisha, India
by: Sanghamitra Pati, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)