Box rest and analgesia compared to arthroscopic debridement for lame horses with hindlimb subchondral lucencies

Category of research Treatment. Number and type of study designs reviewed Two relevant publications were found, both were retrospective case series. Strength of evidence Weak. Outcomes reported The success rate of horses returning to previous level of competition following arthroscopic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlotte Taylor, Julia Dubuc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: RCVS Knowledge 2023-04-01
Series:Veterinary Evidence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/603
_version_ 1797780575505874944
author Charlotte Taylor
Julia Dubuc
author_facet Charlotte Taylor
Julia Dubuc
author_sort Charlotte Taylor
collection DOAJ
description Category of research Treatment. Number and type of study designs reviewed Two relevant publications were found, both were retrospective case series. Strength of evidence Weak. Outcomes reported The success rate of horses returning to previous level of competition following arthroscopic debridement varies widely in the literature available, from 25–86%. While a study reports 64% return to soundness following rest, it is not clear which horses received strict box rest or paddock rest, the duration of the rest period, and whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were also prescribed. It is also worth noting that all horses which undergo surgery will also undergo a period of box rest – which makes the two treatment options difficult to compare. Conclusion Newer techniques with better success rates are now available and should be considered in lieu of box rest or arthroscopic debridement. Across all treatments available, age remains an important factor with regards to return to soundness, with older horses having a poorer prognosis. Thorough examinations should therefore be performed to rule out concurrent conditions before deciding upon treatment options. How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T23:45:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f92174fae1a046beadde95e7da083d78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2396-9776
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T23:45:50Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher RCVS Knowledge
record_format Article
series Veterinary Evidence
spelling doaj.art-f92174fae1a046beadde95e7da083d782023-07-14T09:17:28ZengRCVS KnowledgeVeterinary Evidence2396-97762023-04-018210.18849/ve.v8i2.603437Box rest and analgesia compared to arthroscopic debridement for lame horses with hindlimb subchondral lucenciesCharlotte Taylorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5587-4352Julia Dubuchttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0552-9117Category of research Treatment. Number and type of study designs reviewed Two relevant publications were found, both were retrospective case series. Strength of evidence Weak. Outcomes reported The success rate of horses returning to previous level of competition following arthroscopic debridement varies widely in the literature available, from 25–86%. While a study reports 64% return to soundness following rest, it is not clear which horses received strict box rest or paddock rest, the duration of the rest period, and whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were also prescribed. It is also worth noting that all horses which undergo surgery will also undergo a period of box rest – which makes the two treatment options difficult to compare. Conclusion Newer techniques with better success rates are now available and should be considered in lieu of box rest or arthroscopic debridement. Across all treatments available, age remains an important factor with regards to return to soundness, with older horses having a poorer prognosis. Thorough examinations should therefore be performed to rule out concurrent conditions before deciding upon treatment options. How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/603subchondrallucencycysticequinestifletibiacondylehorsearthroscopic debridement
spellingShingle Charlotte Taylor
Julia Dubuc
Box rest and analgesia compared to arthroscopic debridement for lame horses with hindlimb subchondral lucencies
Veterinary Evidence
subchondral
lucency
cystic
equine
stifle
tibia
condyle
horse
arthroscopic debridement
title Box rest and analgesia compared to arthroscopic debridement for lame horses with hindlimb subchondral lucencies
title_full Box rest and analgesia compared to arthroscopic debridement for lame horses with hindlimb subchondral lucencies
title_fullStr Box rest and analgesia compared to arthroscopic debridement for lame horses with hindlimb subchondral lucencies
title_full_unstemmed Box rest and analgesia compared to arthroscopic debridement for lame horses with hindlimb subchondral lucencies
title_short Box rest and analgesia compared to arthroscopic debridement for lame horses with hindlimb subchondral lucencies
title_sort box rest and analgesia compared to arthroscopic debridement for lame horses with hindlimb subchondral lucencies
topic subchondral
lucency
cystic
equine
stifle
tibia
condyle
horse
arthroscopic debridement
url https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/603
work_keys_str_mv AT charlottetaylor boxrestandanalgesiacomparedtoarthroscopicdebridementforlamehorseswithhindlimbsubchondrallucencies
AT juliadubuc boxrestandanalgesiacomparedtoarthroscopicdebridementforlamehorseswithhindlimbsubchondrallucencies