Assessment of the abstract reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analysis: a literature survey
Abstract Background There is an increasing number of published systematic reviews (SR) of dose-response meta-analyses (DRMAs) over the past decades. However, the quality of abstract reporting of these SR-DRMAs remains to be understood. We conducted a literature survey to investigate the abstract rep...
Main Authors: | Peng-Li Jia, Bin Xu, Jing-Min Cheng, Xi-Hao Huang, Joey S. W. Kwong, Yu Liu, Chao Zhang, Ying Han, Chang Xu |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0798-5 |
Similar Items
-
Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience
by: Katarina Maticic, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering surgical management, or quality of life after surgical management, of osteoarthritis of the knee
by: Parker Siex, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Improving the quality of reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey
by: Chang Xu, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology
by: Milagros Adobes Martin, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions
by: Francisco Gómez-García, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)