Comparison of Milled Full-Arch Implant-Supported Frameworks Realised with a Full Digital Workflow or from Conventional Impression: A Clinical Study
Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of a new digital impression system, comparing it to the plaster impression technique in the realization of full-arch implant-supported metal frameworks. Methods: We took 11 scans (8 of the upper maxilla and 3 of the lower jaw)...
Main Authors: | Francesco Pera, Paolo Pesce, Francesco Bagnasco, Nicolò Pancini, Massimo Carossa, Lorenzo Baldelli, Marco Annunziata, Marco Migliorati, Domenico Baldi, Maria Menini |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Materials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/16/2/833 |
Similar Items
-
Trueness of Intraoral Scanners in Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Analysis on the Effect of Operators’ Experience and Implant Number
by: Paolo Pesce, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Accuracy of Master Casts Generated Using Conventional and Digital Impression Modalities: Part 2—The Full Arch Dimension
by: Mohammed E. Sayed, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01) -
Solid index versus intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: in vitro trueness evaluation
by: Francesco Guido Mangano, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions
by: Emad A. Albdour, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Assessment of Fit on Ten Screw-Retained FrameworksRealized through Digital Full-Arch Implant Impression
by: Maurizio De Francesco, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)