Response mechanisms to acid stress promote LF82 replication in macrophages

BackgroundAdherent–invasive E. coli (AIEC) LF82 is capable of adhering to and invading intestinal epithelial cells, as well as replicating within macrophages without inducing host cell death.MethodsWe compared the transcriptomics of LF82 at pH=7.5 and pH=5.8 by RNA-sequencing, and qRT-PCR verified d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ting Yao, Yu Huang, Zimeng Huai, Xingmei Liu, Xiaowen Liu, Yutao Liu, Hao Sun, Yu Pang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1255083/full
_version_ 1797662968883707904
author Ting Yao
Ting Yao
Yu Huang
Yu Huang
Zimeng Huai
Zimeng Huai
Xingmei Liu
Xingmei Liu
Xiaowen Liu
Yutao Liu
Yutao Liu
Hao Sun
Hao Sun
Yu Pang
Yu Pang
author_facet Ting Yao
Ting Yao
Yu Huang
Yu Huang
Zimeng Huai
Zimeng Huai
Xingmei Liu
Xingmei Liu
Xiaowen Liu
Yutao Liu
Yutao Liu
Hao Sun
Hao Sun
Yu Pang
Yu Pang
author_sort Ting Yao
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundAdherent–invasive E. coli (AIEC) LF82 is capable of adhering to and invading intestinal epithelial cells, as well as replicating within macrophages without inducing host cell death.MethodsWe compared the transcriptomics of LF82 at pH=7.5 and pH=5.8 by RNA-sequencing, and qRT-PCR verified differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The deletion mutants of DEGs in the treatment group (pH=5.8) compared to the control group (pH=7.5) were constructed by λ recombinant. The replication differences between the mutants and WT infected Raw 264.7 at 24 h.p.i were analyzed by combining LB solid plate count and confocal observation. NH4Cl and chloroquine diphosphate (CQ) were used for acid neutralization to study the effect of pH on the replication of LF82 in macrophages. Na2NO3 was added to RPMI 1640 to study the effect of nitrate on the replication of LF82 in macrophages. 0.3% solid LB was used for flagellar motility assay and Hela was used to study flagellar gene deletion mutants and WT adhesion and invasion ability.ResultsIn this study, we found that infection with LF82 results in acidification of macrophages. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that an intracellular acidic environment is necessary for LF82 replication. Transcriptome and phenotypic analysis showed that high expression of acid shock genes and acid fitness genes promotes LF82 replication in macrophages. Further, we found that the replication of LF82 in macrophages was increased under nitrate treatment, and nitrogen metabolism genes of LF82 were upregulated in acid treatment. The replication in macrophages of ΔnarK, ΔnarXL, ΔnarP, and Δhmp were decreased. In addition, we found that the expression of flagellar genes was downregulated in acidic pH and after LF82 invading macrophages. Motility assay shows that the movement of LF82 on an acidic semisolid agar plate was limited. Further results showed that ΔfliC and ΔfliD decreased in motility, adhesion ability, and invasion of host cells, but no significant effect on replication in macrophages was observed.ConclusionIn this study, we simulated the acidic environment in macrophages, combined with transcriptome technology, and explained from the genetic level that LF82 promotes replication by activating its acid shock and fitness system, enhancing nitrate utilization, and inhibiting flagellar function.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T19:07:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f92e47e9c42b4874b78a5525e91551b8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2235-2988
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T19:07:48Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-f92e47e9c42b4874b78a5525e91551b82023-10-10T05:48:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology2235-29882023-10-011310.3389/fcimb.2023.12550831255083Response mechanisms to acid stress promote LF82 replication in macrophagesTing Yao0Ting Yao1Yu Huang2Yu Huang3Zimeng Huai4Zimeng Huai5Xingmei Liu6Xingmei Liu7Xiaowen Liu8Yutao Liu9Yutao Liu10Hao Sun11Hao Sun12Yu Pang13Yu Pang14TEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Tianjin, ChinaThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology, TEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, ChinaTEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Tianjin, ChinaThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology, TEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, ChinaTEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Tianjin, ChinaThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology, TEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, ChinaTEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Tianjin, ChinaThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology, TEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, ChinaAcademy of Psychology and Behavior, Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, ChinaTEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Tianjin, ChinaThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology, TEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, ChinaTEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Tianjin, ChinaThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology, TEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, ChinaTEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Tianjin, ChinaThe Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology, TEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, ChinaBackgroundAdherent–invasive E. coli (AIEC) LF82 is capable of adhering to and invading intestinal epithelial cells, as well as replicating within macrophages without inducing host cell death.MethodsWe compared the transcriptomics of LF82 at pH=7.5 and pH=5.8 by RNA-sequencing, and qRT-PCR verified differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The deletion mutants of DEGs in the treatment group (pH=5.8) compared to the control group (pH=7.5) were constructed by λ recombinant. The replication differences between the mutants and WT infected Raw 264.7 at 24 h.p.i were analyzed by combining LB solid plate count and confocal observation. NH4Cl and chloroquine diphosphate (CQ) were used for acid neutralization to study the effect of pH on the replication of LF82 in macrophages. Na2NO3 was added to RPMI 1640 to study the effect of nitrate on the replication of LF82 in macrophages. 0.3% solid LB was used for flagellar motility assay and Hela was used to study flagellar gene deletion mutants and WT adhesion and invasion ability.ResultsIn this study, we found that infection with LF82 results in acidification of macrophages. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that an intracellular acidic environment is necessary for LF82 replication. Transcriptome and phenotypic analysis showed that high expression of acid shock genes and acid fitness genes promotes LF82 replication in macrophages. Further, we found that the replication of LF82 in macrophages was increased under nitrate treatment, and nitrogen metabolism genes of LF82 were upregulated in acid treatment. The replication in macrophages of ΔnarK, ΔnarXL, ΔnarP, and Δhmp were decreased. In addition, we found that the expression of flagellar genes was downregulated in acidic pH and after LF82 invading macrophages. Motility assay shows that the movement of LF82 on an acidic semisolid agar plate was limited. Further results showed that ΔfliC and ΔfliD decreased in motility, adhesion ability, and invasion of host cells, but no significant effect on replication in macrophages was observed.ConclusionIn this study, we simulated the acidic environment in macrophages, combined with transcriptome technology, and explained from the genetic level that LF82 promotes replication by activating its acid shock and fitness system, enhancing nitrate utilization, and inhibiting flagellar function.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1255083/fulladherent-invasive E. coli (AIEC)macrophagesacid shockacid fitnessnitrate utilizationflagellar
spellingShingle Ting Yao
Ting Yao
Yu Huang
Yu Huang
Zimeng Huai
Zimeng Huai
Xingmei Liu
Xingmei Liu
Xiaowen Liu
Yutao Liu
Yutao Liu
Hao Sun
Hao Sun
Yu Pang
Yu Pang
Response mechanisms to acid stress promote LF82 replication in macrophages
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
adherent-invasive E. coli (AIEC)
macrophages
acid shock
acid fitness
nitrate utilization
flagellar
title Response mechanisms to acid stress promote LF82 replication in macrophages
title_full Response mechanisms to acid stress promote LF82 replication in macrophages
title_fullStr Response mechanisms to acid stress promote LF82 replication in macrophages
title_full_unstemmed Response mechanisms to acid stress promote LF82 replication in macrophages
title_short Response mechanisms to acid stress promote LF82 replication in macrophages
title_sort response mechanisms to acid stress promote lf82 replication in macrophages
topic adherent-invasive E. coli (AIEC)
macrophages
acid shock
acid fitness
nitrate utilization
flagellar
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1255083/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tingyao responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT tingyao responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT yuhuang responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT yuhuang responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT zimenghuai responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT zimenghuai responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT xingmeiliu responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT xingmeiliu responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT xiaowenliu responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT yutaoliu responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT yutaoliu responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT haosun responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT haosun responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT yupang responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages
AT yupang responsemechanismstoacidstresspromotelf82replicationinmacrophages