Ethics of vaccination prioritization and compulsory vaccination: An integrative approach
Vaccine scarcity and availability distinguish two central ethics questions raised by the Covid-19 pandemic. First, in situations of scarcity, which groups of persons should receive priority? Second, in situations where safe and effective vaccines are available, what circumstances and reasons can sup...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2021-0012 |
| _version_ | 1819001507265118208 |
|---|---|
| author | O’Malley Martin Zerth Jürgen Knoepffler Nikolaus |
| author_facet | O’Malley Martin Zerth Jürgen Knoepffler Nikolaus |
| author_sort | O’Malley Martin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Vaccine scarcity and availability distinguish two central ethics questions raised by the Covid-19 pandemic. First, in situations of scarcity, which groups of persons should receive priority? Second, in situations where safe and effective vaccines are available, what circumstances and reasons can support mandatory vaccination? Regarding the first question, normative approaches converge in prioritizing most-vulnerable groups. Though there is room for prudential judgement regarding which groups are most vulnerable, the human dignity principle is most relevant for prioritization consideration of both medical and non-medical issues. The second question concerning mandates is distinct from considerations about persons’ individual moral duty to receive vaccines judged reasonably safe and critical for individual and public health. While there is consensus regarding the potential normative support for mandated vaccination, the paternalistic government intervention of vaccine mandates requires a high bar of demonstrated vaccine safety and public health risk. We discuss stronger and weaker forms of paternalism to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic from an “integrative” approach that integrates leading normative approaches. We argue against a population-wide compulsory vaccination and support prudential measures to 1) protect vulnerable groups; 2) focus upon incentivizing vaccine participation; 3) maintain maximum-possible individual freedoms, and 4) allow schools, organizations, and enterprises to implement vaccine requirements in local contexts. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T22:50:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f940abc185824ee0875e6e4bbf32790b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2453-7829 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T22:50:18Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) |
| spelling | doaj.art-f940abc185824ee0875e6e4bbf32790b2022-12-21T19:24:16ZengSciendoEthics & Bioethics (in Central Europe)2453-78292021-12-01113-415316210.2478/ebce-2021-0012Ethics of vaccination prioritization and compulsory vaccination: An integrative approachO’Malley Martin0Zerth Jürgen1Knoepffler Nikolaus2Friedrich Schiller UniversityJena (Germany)SRH Wilhelm Loehe University of Applied Science (Germany)Friedrich Schiller UniversityJena (Germany)Vaccine scarcity and availability distinguish two central ethics questions raised by the Covid-19 pandemic. First, in situations of scarcity, which groups of persons should receive priority? Second, in situations where safe and effective vaccines are available, what circumstances and reasons can support mandatory vaccination? Regarding the first question, normative approaches converge in prioritizing most-vulnerable groups. Though there is room for prudential judgement regarding which groups are most vulnerable, the human dignity principle is most relevant for prioritization consideration of both medical and non-medical issues. The second question concerning mandates is distinct from considerations about persons’ individual moral duty to receive vaccines judged reasonably safe and critical for individual and public health. While there is consensus regarding the potential normative support for mandated vaccination, the paternalistic government intervention of vaccine mandates requires a high bar of demonstrated vaccine safety and public health risk. We discuss stronger and weaker forms of paternalism to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic from an “integrative” approach that integrates leading normative approaches. We argue against a population-wide compulsory vaccination and support prudential measures to 1) protect vulnerable groups; 2) focus upon incentivizing vaccine participation; 3) maintain maximum-possible individual freedoms, and 4) allow schools, organizations, and enterprises to implement vaccine requirements in local contexts.https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2021-0012covid-19vulnerable personsprioritizationcompulsory vaccinationdignity |
| spellingShingle | O’Malley Martin Zerth Jürgen Knoepffler Nikolaus Ethics of vaccination prioritization and compulsory vaccination: An integrative approach Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) covid-19 vulnerable persons prioritization compulsory vaccination dignity |
| title | Ethics of vaccination prioritization and compulsory vaccination: An integrative approach |
| title_full | Ethics of vaccination prioritization and compulsory vaccination: An integrative approach |
| title_fullStr | Ethics of vaccination prioritization and compulsory vaccination: An integrative approach |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ethics of vaccination prioritization and compulsory vaccination: An integrative approach |
| title_short | Ethics of vaccination prioritization and compulsory vaccination: An integrative approach |
| title_sort | ethics of vaccination prioritization and compulsory vaccination an integrative approach |
| topic | covid-19 vulnerable persons prioritization compulsory vaccination dignity |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2021-0012 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT omalleymartin ethicsofvaccinationprioritizationandcompulsoryvaccinationanintegrativeapproach AT zerthjurgen ethicsofvaccinationprioritizationandcompulsoryvaccinationanintegrativeapproach AT knoepfflernikolaus ethicsofvaccinationprioritizationandcompulsoryvaccinationanintegrativeapproach |