Sanctionner : parfaire la loi

The “sanction” was the mechanism by which the king assented to the law without using his right of veto. The revolutionary constitution of 1971 was the only constitution to provide for the granting of royal assent. The parliamentary debate on this point was especially heated, and produced theories th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Guillaume Glénard
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Association Clio et Themis 2021-06-01
Series:Clio@Themis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/1678
_version_ 1828341640271495168
author Guillaume Glénard
author_facet Guillaume Glénard
author_sort Guillaume Glénard
collection DOAJ
description The “sanction” was the mechanism by which the king assented to the law without using his right of veto. The revolutionary constitution of 1971 was the only constitution to provide for the granting of royal assent. The parliamentary debate on this point was especially heated, and produced theories that could not be properly understood if they were not put into context and if the influence of parliamentary strategy upon political ideas was not taken into account. Seemingly technical, the question of royal assent actually raises a political problem: Who was making law under the constitutional monarchy, the assembly alone or the assembly in conjunction with the king? In other words, was the king “co-legislator” or not? The response to this question is crucial. The conception of the king as co-legislator might account for the various forms of veto, as well as the interpretation of the functions of royal assent in the framework of the Constitution of 1791. Only a legislative decree assented by the king could be considered a perfect law.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T23:15:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f94394a627074087a1cdaec626a96fd2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2105-0929
language fra
last_indexed 2024-04-13T23:15:47Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Association Clio et Themis
record_format Article
series Clio@Themis
spelling doaj.art-f94394a627074087a1cdaec626a96fd22022-12-22T02:25:25ZfraAssociation Clio et ThemisClio@Themis2105-09292021-06-01610.35562/cliothemis.1678Sanctionner : parfaire la loiGuillaume GlénardThe “sanction” was the mechanism by which the king assented to the law without using his right of veto. The revolutionary constitution of 1971 was the only constitution to provide for the granting of royal assent. The parliamentary debate on this point was especially heated, and produced theories that could not be properly understood if they were not put into context and if the influence of parliamentary strategy upon political ideas was not taken into account. Seemingly technical, the question of royal assent actually raises a political problem: Who was making law under the constitutional monarchy, the assembly alone or the assembly in conjunction with the king? In other words, was the king “co-legislator” or not? The response to this question is crucial. The conception of the king as co-legislator might account for the various forms of veto, as well as the interpretation of the functions of royal assent in the framework of the Constitution of 1791. Only a legislative decree assented by the king could be considered a perfect law.http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/1678legislative powervetoparliamentary strategy
spellingShingle Guillaume Glénard
Sanctionner : parfaire la loi
Clio@Themis
legislative power
veto
parliamentary strategy
title Sanctionner : parfaire la loi
title_full Sanctionner : parfaire la loi
title_fullStr Sanctionner : parfaire la loi
title_full_unstemmed Sanctionner : parfaire la loi
title_short Sanctionner : parfaire la loi
title_sort sanctionner parfaire la loi
topic legislative power
veto
parliamentary strategy
url http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/1678
work_keys_str_mv AT guillaumeglenard sanctionnerparfairelaloi