Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study
Abstract Background The methodological quality and completeness of reporting of the systematic reviews (SRs) is fundamental to optimal implementation of evidence-based health care and the reduction of research waste. Methods exist to appraise SRs yet little is known about how they are used in SRs or...
Main Authors: | Kusala Pussegoda, Lucy Turner, Chantelle Garritty, Alain Mayhew, Becky Skidmore, Adrienne Stevens, Isabelle Boutron, Rafael Sarkis-Onofre, Lise M. Bjerre, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Douglas G. Altman, David Moher |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0507-6 |
Similar Items
-
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
by: Kusala Pussegoda, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
by: Pussegoda, K, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study
by: Pussegoda, K, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Reasons for Guideline Nonadherence at Heart Failure Discharge
by: Lauren G. Gilstrap, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Quality Assessment and Implications for Further Study of Acupotomy: Case Reports Using the Case Report Guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist
by: Hyungsun Jun, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)