| Summary: | Objective: to identify the relationship of regional anti-corruption procedural legislation with other branches of legislation for its further improvement.Methods: dialectical approach to cognition of social phenomena using general scientific methods of cognition, based on it:analysis, synthesis, comparison, grouping, etc.Results: the current anti-corruption procedural legislation of the subjects of the Russian Federation is classified on the following grounds: status of the Russian Federation subject which adopted the legislative act; sector; subject of legal regulation and the circle of persons. As a result of the classification, the interrelations of the Russian regional anti-corruption procedural legislation with the federal and regional state (constitutional, statutory), administrative, municipal, informational and labor legislation were revealed. Scientific novelty: for the first time in the Russian legal science, classification of anti-corruption procedural legislation of the Russian Federation subjects was carried out, which allowed drawing the following conclusions. First, the anti-corruption procedural legislation of the Russian Federation subjects is an inter-sectoral institution, interconnected with various branches of regional legislation (state (constitutional, statutory), administrative, municipal, informational, and labor)), which define its structure and content. Second, the proposed classification of the anti-corruption procedural legislation of the Russian Federation subjects (status of the Russian Federation subject which adopted the legislative act; sector; subject of legal regulation and the circle of persons) showed possible criteria and directions of systematization, including future codification of this legislation. Third, on the basis of the proposed classification of anti-corruption procedural legislation of the Russian Federation subjects, it is possible to determine the most relevant and practically significant areas of its research in the near future: state anti-corruption procedural legislation, administrative anti-corruption procedural legislation, municipal anti-corruption procedural legislation, informational anti-corruption procedural legislation, and labor anti-corruption procedural legislation. Practical significance: the research results can be used in law-making activities for systematization and codification of the Russian regional anti-corruption legislation.
|
|---|