Anterior subject positioning affects the maximal exerted isometric plantar flexion moment.

We examined the effect of increased anterior subject positioning toward the dynamometer's footplate during maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs) on the joint moment, rotation and rate of torque development (RTD). Fourteen subjects, with their hip flexed (110°) and knee fully extended...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Savvas Stafilidis, Christoph Sickinger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219840
_version_ 1818584273027858432
author Savvas Stafilidis
Christoph Sickinger
author_facet Savvas Stafilidis
Christoph Sickinger
author_sort Savvas Stafilidis
collection DOAJ
description We examined the effect of increased anterior subject positioning toward the dynamometer's footplate during maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs) on the joint moment, rotation and rate of torque development (RTD). Fourteen subjects, with their hip flexed (110°) and knee fully extended (180°), underwent ramp maximal and rapid voluntary isometric plantar flexion contractions at 4 different positions (0, 3, 6 and 8 cm; randomized). At position "0 cm", the foot was in full contact with the footplate; at the additional positions, the chair was moved forward. Body kinematics (VICON) and kinetics (HUMAC Norm, PEDAR) were captured synchronously during MVCs and RTDs. The results showed that the maximal exerted joint moment was significantly (p<0.01) increased by >32% from the 0-cm to 8-cm position (126 and 172 Nm, respectively); however, at the "6 cm" and "8 cm" positions, no significant difference was found. The joint rotation was significantly (p<0.01) reduced by >50% (from 15.5 to 7.1°; 0-8 cm). The maxRTD was only significantly higher at "6 cm" compared with the "0 cm" position. The time to reach maxRTD showed shorter tendencies for the "8 cm" position than for all other positions. The results indicate an underestimation of the plantar flexor maximal force potential with the current measuring technique. This could be critical in pre-post study designs where a 2-cm alteration in the chair position can induce an error of ~9% in the joint moment. The joint rotation could be reduced but not completely eliminated. For position standardization purposes, a pressure >220 kPa under the subject's foot is needed to achieve the maximal joint moment. We discussed the possible origins (fascicle length, neural drive) of the increased joint moment.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T08:18:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f96114c4bf2941758895284cb1527250
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T08:18:33Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-f96114c4bf2941758895284cb15272502022-12-21T22:38:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01147e021984010.1371/journal.pone.0219840Anterior subject positioning affects the maximal exerted isometric plantar flexion moment.Savvas StafilidisChristoph SickingerWe examined the effect of increased anterior subject positioning toward the dynamometer's footplate during maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs) on the joint moment, rotation and rate of torque development (RTD). Fourteen subjects, with their hip flexed (110°) and knee fully extended (180°), underwent ramp maximal and rapid voluntary isometric plantar flexion contractions at 4 different positions (0, 3, 6 and 8 cm; randomized). At position "0 cm", the foot was in full contact with the footplate; at the additional positions, the chair was moved forward. Body kinematics (VICON) and kinetics (HUMAC Norm, PEDAR) were captured synchronously during MVCs and RTDs. The results showed that the maximal exerted joint moment was significantly (p<0.01) increased by >32% from the 0-cm to 8-cm position (126 and 172 Nm, respectively); however, at the "6 cm" and "8 cm" positions, no significant difference was found. The joint rotation was significantly (p<0.01) reduced by >50% (from 15.5 to 7.1°; 0-8 cm). The maxRTD was only significantly higher at "6 cm" compared with the "0 cm" position. The time to reach maxRTD showed shorter tendencies for the "8 cm" position than for all other positions. The results indicate an underestimation of the plantar flexor maximal force potential with the current measuring technique. This could be critical in pre-post study designs where a 2-cm alteration in the chair position can induce an error of ~9% in the joint moment. The joint rotation could be reduced but not completely eliminated. For position standardization purposes, a pressure >220 kPa under the subject's foot is needed to achieve the maximal joint moment. We discussed the possible origins (fascicle length, neural drive) of the increased joint moment.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219840
spellingShingle Savvas Stafilidis
Christoph Sickinger
Anterior subject positioning affects the maximal exerted isometric plantar flexion moment.
PLoS ONE
title Anterior subject positioning affects the maximal exerted isometric plantar flexion moment.
title_full Anterior subject positioning affects the maximal exerted isometric plantar flexion moment.
title_fullStr Anterior subject positioning affects the maximal exerted isometric plantar flexion moment.
title_full_unstemmed Anterior subject positioning affects the maximal exerted isometric plantar flexion moment.
title_short Anterior subject positioning affects the maximal exerted isometric plantar flexion moment.
title_sort anterior subject positioning affects the maximal exerted isometric plantar flexion moment
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219840
work_keys_str_mv AT savvasstafilidis anteriorsubjectpositioningaffectsthemaximalexertedisometricplantarflexionmoment
AT christophsickinger anteriorsubjectpositioningaffectsthemaximalexertedisometricplantarflexionmoment