Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists

Background and objectives: residual paralysis following the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) without neuromuscular monitoring remains a clinical problem, even when NMBDs are used. This study surveys postoperative residual curarization and critical respiratory events in the recovery room,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ismail Aytac, Aysun Postaci, Betul Aytac, Ozlem Sacan, Gulcin Hilal Alay, Bulent Celik, Kadriye Kahveci, Bayazit Dikmen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-01-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001414000426
_version_ 1797998146837544960
author Ismail Aytac
Aysun Postaci
Betul Aytac
Ozlem Sacan
Gulcin Hilal Alay
Bulent Celik
Kadriye Kahveci
Bayazit Dikmen
author_facet Ismail Aytac
Aysun Postaci
Betul Aytac
Ozlem Sacan
Gulcin Hilal Alay
Bulent Celik
Kadriye Kahveci
Bayazit Dikmen
author_sort Ismail Aytac
collection DOAJ
description Background and objectives: residual paralysis following the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) without neuromuscular monitoring remains a clinical problem, even when NMBDs are used. This study surveys postoperative residual curarization and critical respiratory events in the recovery room, as well as the clinical approach to PORC of anesthesiologists in our institution. Methods: This observational study included 415 patients who received general anesthesia with intermediate-acting NMBDs. Anesthesia was maintained by non-participating anesthesiologists who were blinded to the study. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed upon arrival in the recovery room. A CRE was defined as requiring airway support, peripheral oxygen saturation <90% and 90–93% despite receiving 3 L/min nasal O2, respiratory rate >20 breaths/min, accessory muscle usage, difficulty with swallowing or speaking, and requiring reintubation. The clinical approach of our anesthesiologists toward reversal agents was examined using an 8-question mini-survey shortly after the study. Results: The incidence of PORC was 43% (n = 179) for TOFR <0.9, and 15% (n = 61) for TOFR <0.7. The incidence of TOFR <0.9 was significantly higher in women, in those with ASA physical status 3, and with anesthesia of short duration (p < 0.05). In addition, 66% (n = 272) of the 415 patients arriving at the recovery room had received neostigmine. A TOFR <0.9 was found in 46% (n = 126) of the patients receiving neostigmine. Conclusions: When routine objective neuromuscular monitoring is not available, PORC remains a clinical problem despite the use of NMBDs. The timing and optimal antagonism of the neuromuscular blockade, and routine objective neuromuscular monitoring is recommended to enhance patient safety. Resumo: Justificativa e objetivos: A paralisia residual após o uso de bloqueadores neuromusculares (BNMs) sem monitoração neuromuscular continua sendo um problema clínico, mesmo quando BNMs são usados. Este estudo pesquisou a curarização residual pós-operatória e os eventos respiratórios críticos em sala de recuperação, bem como a abordagem clínica da CRPO feita pelos anestesiologistas em nossa instituição. Métodos: Este estudo observacional incluiu 415 pacientes que receberam anestesia geral com BNMs de ação intermediária. A manutenção da anestesia foi feita por anestesiologistas não participantes, “cegos” para o estudo. A monitoração neuromuscular foi realizada no momento da chegada à sala de recuperação. Um ERC foi definido como necessidade de suporte ventilatório; saturação periférica de oxigênio <90% e 90-93%, a despeito de receber 3 L/min de O2 via cânula nasal; frequência respiratória >20 bpm; uso de musculatura acessória; dificuldade de engolir ou falar e necessidade de reintubação. A abordagem clínica de nossos anestesiologistas, em relação aos agentes de reversão, foi avaliada usando um miniquestionário de oito perguntas logo após o estudo. Resultados: A incidência de CRPO foi de 43% (n = 179) para a SQE <0 e 15% (n = 61) para a SQE <0,7. A incidência de SQE <0,9 foi significativamente maior em mulheres, pacientes com estado físico ASA III e com anestesia de curta duração (p < 0,05). Além disso, 66% (n = 272) dos 415 pacientes que chegam à sala de recuperação haviam recebido neostigmina. Uma SQE <0,9 foi encontrada em 46% (n = 126) dos pacientes que receberam neostigmina. Conclusão: Quando a monitoração neuromuscular objetiva de rotina não está disponível, a CRPO continua sendo um problema clínico, a despeito do uso de BNMs. O momento e o antagonismo ideais do bloqueio neuromuscular e a monitoração neuromuscular objetiva de rotina são recomendados para aumentar a segurança do paciente. Keywords: Complications, Postoperative, Residual curarization, Monitoring, Neuromuscular block, Acute respiratory events, Palavras-chave: Complicações, Pós-operatório, Curarização residual, Monitoração, Bloqueio neuromuscular, Eventos respiratórias agudos
first_indexed 2024-04-11T10:43:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f9616a6036c5444ead468860ed810c4b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0104-0014
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T10:43:58Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-f9616a6036c5444ead468860ed810c4b2022-12-22T04:29:06ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology0104-00142016-01-016615562Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologistsIsmail Aytac0Aysun Postaci1Betul Aytac2Ozlem Sacan3Gulcin Hilal Alay4Bulent Celik5Kadriye Kahveci6Bayazit Dikmen7Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Sami Ulus Children's Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Corresponding author.Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ministry of Health Etlik Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyBackground and objectives: residual paralysis following the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) without neuromuscular monitoring remains a clinical problem, even when NMBDs are used. This study surveys postoperative residual curarization and critical respiratory events in the recovery room, as well as the clinical approach to PORC of anesthesiologists in our institution. Methods: This observational study included 415 patients who received general anesthesia with intermediate-acting NMBDs. Anesthesia was maintained by non-participating anesthesiologists who were blinded to the study. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed upon arrival in the recovery room. A CRE was defined as requiring airway support, peripheral oxygen saturation <90% and 90–93% despite receiving 3 L/min nasal O2, respiratory rate >20 breaths/min, accessory muscle usage, difficulty with swallowing or speaking, and requiring reintubation. The clinical approach of our anesthesiologists toward reversal agents was examined using an 8-question mini-survey shortly after the study. Results: The incidence of PORC was 43% (n = 179) for TOFR <0.9, and 15% (n = 61) for TOFR <0.7. The incidence of TOFR <0.9 was significantly higher in women, in those with ASA physical status 3, and with anesthesia of short duration (p < 0.05). In addition, 66% (n = 272) of the 415 patients arriving at the recovery room had received neostigmine. A TOFR <0.9 was found in 46% (n = 126) of the patients receiving neostigmine. Conclusions: When routine objective neuromuscular monitoring is not available, PORC remains a clinical problem despite the use of NMBDs. The timing and optimal antagonism of the neuromuscular blockade, and routine objective neuromuscular monitoring is recommended to enhance patient safety. Resumo: Justificativa e objetivos: A paralisia residual após o uso de bloqueadores neuromusculares (BNMs) sem monitoração neuromuscular continua sendo um problema clínico, mesmo quando BNMs são usados. Este estudo pesquisou a curarização residual pós-operatória e os eventos respiratórios críticos em sala de recuperação, bem como a abordagem clínica da CRPO feita pelos anestesiologistas em nossa instituição. Métodos: Este estudo observacional incluiu 415 pacientes que receberam anestesia geral com BNMs de ação intermediária. A manutenção da anestesia foi feita por anestesiologistas não participantes, “cegos” para o estudo. A monitoração neuromuscular foi realizada no momento da chegada à sala de recuperação. Um ERC foi definido como necessidade de suporte ventilatório; saturação periférica de oxigênio <90% e 90-93%, a despeito de receber 3 L/min de O2 via cânula nasal; frequência respiratória >20 bpm; uso de musculatura acessória; dificuldade de engolir ou falar e necessidade de reintubação. A abordagem clínica de nossos anestesiologistas, em relação aos agentes de reversão, foi avaliada usando um miniquestionário de oito perguntas logo após o estudo. Resultados: A incidência de CRPO foi de 43% (n = 179) para a SQE <0 e 15% (n = 61) para a SQE <0,7. A incidência de SQE <0,9 foi significativamente maior em mulheres, pacientes com estado físico ASA III e com anestesia de curta duração (p < 0,05). Além disso, 66% (n = 272) dos 415 pacientes que chegam à sala de recuperação haviam recebido neostigmina. Uma SQE <0,9 foi encontrada em 46% (n = 126) dos pacientes que receberam neostigmina. Conclusão: Quando a monitoração neuromuscular objetiva de rotina não está disponível, a CRPO continua sendo um problema clínico, a despeito do uso de BNMs. O momento e o antagonismo ideais do bloqueio neuromuscular e a monitoração neuromuscular objetiva de rotina são recomendados para aumentar a segurança do paciente. Keywords: Complications, Postoperative, Residual curarization, Monitoring, Neuromuscular block, Acute respiratory events, Palavras-chave: Complicações, Pós-operatório, Curarização residual, Monitoração, Bloqueio neuromuscular, Eventos respiratórias agudoshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001414000426
spellingShingle Ismail Aytac
Aysun Postaci
Betul Aytac
Ozlem Sacan
Gulcin Hilal Alay
Bulent Celik
Kadriye Kahveci
Bayazit Dikmen
Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
title Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists
title_full Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists
title_fullStr Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists
title_full_unstemmed Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists
title_short Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists
title_sort survey of postoperative residual curarization acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001414000426
work_keys_str_mv AT ismailaytac surveyofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationacuterespiratoryeventsandapproachofanesthesiologists
AT aysunpostaci surveyofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationacuterespiratoryeventsandapproachofanesthesiologists
AT betulaytac surveyofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationacuterespiratoryeventsandapproachofanesthesiologists
AT ozlemsacan surveyofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationacuterespiratoryeventsandapproachofanesthesiologists
AT gulcinhilalalay surveyofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationacuterespiratoryeventsandapproachofanesthesiologists
AT bulentcelik surveyofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationacuterespiratoryeventsandapproachofanesthesiologists
AT kadriyekahveci surveyofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationacuterespiratoryeventsandapproachofanesthesiologists
AT bayazitdikmen surveyofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationacuterespiratoryeventsandapproachofanesthesiologists