Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In‐Hospital Mortality

Background There is increasing utilization of cardiogenic shock treatment algorithms. The cornerstone of these algorithms is the use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring (IHM). We sought to compare the in‐hospital outcomes in patients who received IHM versus no IHM in a real‐world contemporary databas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed Osman, Moinuddin Syed, Brijesh Patel, Muhammad Bilal Munir, Babikir Kheiri, Marco Caccamo, George Sokos, Sudarshan Balla, Mir Babar Basir, Navin K. Kapur, Mamas A. Mamas, Christopher M. Bianco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.021808
_version_ 1797838412152045568
author Mohammed Osman
Moinuddin Syed
Brijesh Patel
Muhammad Bilal Munir
Babikir Kheiri
Marco Caccamo
George Sokos
Sudarshan Balla
Mir Babar Basir
Navin K. Kapur
Mamas A. Mamas
Christopher M. Bianco
author_facet Mohammed Osman
Moinuddin Syed
Brijesh Patel
Muhammad Bilal Munir
Babikir Kheiri
Marco Caccamo
George Sokos
Sudarshan Balla
Mir Babar Basir
Navin K. Kapur
Mamas A. Mamas
Christopher M. Bianco
author_sort Mohammed Osman
collection DOAJ
description Background There is increasing utilization of cardiogenic shock treatment algorithms. The cornerstone of these algorithms is the use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring (IHM). We sought to compare the in‐hospital outcomes in patients who received IHM versus no IHM in a real‐world contemporary database. Methods and Results Patients with cardiogenic shock admitted during October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018, were identified from the National Inpatient Sample. Among this group, we compared the outcomes among patients who received IHM versus no IHM. The primary end point was in‐hospital mortality. Secondary end points included vascular complications, major bleeding, need for renal replacement therapy, length of stay, cost of hospitalization, and rate of utilization of left ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation. Propensity score matching was used for covariate adjustment. A total of 394 635 (IHM=62 565; no IHM=332 070) patients were included. After propensity score matching, 2 well‐matched groups were compared (IHM=62 220; no IHM=62 220). The IHM group had lower in‐hospital mortality (24.1% versus 30.6%, P<0.01), higher percentages of left ventricular assist devices (4.4% versus 1.3%, P<0.01) and heart transplantation (1.3% versus 0.7%, P<0.01) utilization, longer length of hospitalization and higher costs. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of vascular complications, major bleeding, and the need for renal replacement therapy. Conclusions Among patients with cardiogenic shock, the use of IHM is associated with a reduction in in‐hospital mortality and increased utilization of advanced heart failure therapies. Due to the observational nature of the current study, the results should be considered hypothesis‐generating, and future prospective studies confirming these findings are needed.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:40:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f968e6c89e254a2eb9a9563e9344342d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:40:25Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-f968e6c89e254a2eb9a9563e9344342d2023-04-27T11:12:16ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802021-09-01101810.1161/JAHA.121.021808Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In‐Hospital MortalityMohammed Osman0Moinuddin Syed1Brijesh Patel2Muhammad Bilal Munir3Babikir Kheiri4Marco Caccamo5George Sokos6Sudarshan Balla7Mir Babar Basir8Navin K. Kapur9Mamas A. Mamas10Christopher M. Bianco11Division of Cardiology West Virginia University School of Medicine Morgantown WVDivision of Cardiology West Virginia University School of Medicine Morgantown WVDivision of Cardiology West Virginia University School of Medicine Morgantown WVDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine University of California San Diego La Jolla CAKnight Cardiovascular InstituteOregon Health and Science University Portland ORDivision of Cardiology West Virginia University School of Medicine Morgantown WVDivision of Cardiology West Virginia University School of Medicine Morgantown WVDivision of Cardiology West Virginia University School of Medicine Morgantown WVDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine Henry Ford Health System Detroit MIThe Cardiovascular Center Tufts Medical Center Boston MAKeele Cardiovascular Research Group Keele University Keele United KingdomDivision of Cardiology West Virginia University School of Medicine Morgantown WVBackground There is increasing utilization of cardiogenic shock treatment algorithms. The cornerstone of these algorithms is the use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring (IHM). We sought to compare the in‐hospital outcomes in patients who received IHM versus no IHM in a real‐world contemporary database. Methods and Results Patients with cardiogenic shock admitted during October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018, were identified from the National Inpatient Sample. Among this group, we compared the outcomes among patients who received IHM versus no IHM. The primary end point was in‐hospital mortality. Secondary end points included vascular complications, major bleeding, need for renal replacement therapy, length of stay, cost of hospitalization, and rate of utilization of left ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation. Propensity score matching was used for covariate adjustment. A total of 394 635 (IHM=62 565; no IHM=332 070) patients were included. After propensity score matching, 2 well‐matched groups were compared (IHM=62 220; no IHM=62 220). The IHM group had lower in‐hospital mortality (24.1% versus 30.6%, P<0.01), higher percentages of left ventricular assist devices (4.4% versus 1.3%, P<0.01) and heart transplantation (1.3% versus 0.7%, P<0.01) utilization, longer length of hospitalization and higher costs. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of vascular complications, major bleeding, and the need for renal replacement therapy. Conclusions Among patients with cardiogenic shock, the use of IHM is associated with a reduction in in‐hospital mortality and increased utilization of advanced heart failure therapies. Due to the observational nature of the current study, the results should be considered hypothesis‐generating, and future prospective studies confirming these findings are needed.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.021808cardiogenic shockinvasive hemodynamicpulmonary arterial catheterSwan‐Ganz catheter
spellingShingle Mohammed Osman
Moinuddin Syed
Brijesh Patel
Muhammad Bilal Munir
Babikir Kheiri
Marco Caccamo
George Sokos
Sudarshan Balla
Mir Babar Basir
Navin K. Kapur
Mamas A. Mamas
Christopher M. Bianco
Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In‐Hospital Mortality
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
cardiogenic shock
invasive hemodynamic
pulmonary arterial catheter
Swan‐Ganz catheter
title Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In‐Hospital Mortality
title_full Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In‐Hospital Mortality
title_fullStr Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In‐Hospital Mortality
title_full_unstemmed Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In‐Hospital Mortality
title_short Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In‐Hospital Mortality
title_sort invasive hemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock is associated with lower in hospital mortality
topic cardiogenic shock
invasive hemodynamic
pulmonary arterial catheter
Swan‐Ganz catheter
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.021808
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedosman invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality
AT moinuddinsyed invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality
AT brijeshpatel invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality
AT muhammadbilalmunir invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality
AT babikirkheiri invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality
AT marcocaccamo invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality
AT georgesokos invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality
AT sudarshanballa invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality
AT mirbabarbasir invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality
AT navinkkapur invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality
AT mamasamamas invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality
AT christophermbianco invasivehemodynamicmonitoringincardiogenicshockisassociatedwithlowerinhospitalmortality