Rule-based generalization and peak shift in the presence of simple relational rules.
After discrimination learning between two stimuli that lie on a continuum, animals typically exhibit generalization on the basis of similarity to the physical features of the stimuli, often producing a peak-shifted gradient. However, post-discrimination generalization in humans usually resembles a m...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6157829?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1818175828303806464 |
|---|---|
| author | Jessica C Lee Evan J Livesey |
| author_facet | Jessica C Lee Evan J Livesey |
| author_sort | Jessica C Lee |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | After discrimination learning between two stimuli that lie on a continuum, animals typically exhibit generalization on the basis of similarity to the physical features of the stimuli, often producing a peak-shifted gradient. However, post-discrimination generalization in humans usually resembles a monotonically increasing (e.g., linear) gradient that is better characterized as following a relational rule describing the difference between the stimuli. The current study tested whether rule-based generalization could be disrupted by reducing the applicability of a relational rule on test. We compared generalization following a difficult categorization task between a group who could use their rule consistently throughout test (Group Consistent), and a group who could only apply their rule effectively on 50% of test trials and thus could only use it inconsistently (Group Inconsistent). Across two experiments, a peak shift was found in the Inconsistent group and a monotonic gradient in the Consistent group. A post-hoc sequential analysis revealed that the Inconsistent group produced both peak-shifted and monotonic gradients as a function of whether or not the relevant rule was applicable on the previous trial. Reducing the applicability of a rule on test thus appeared to lead participants to revert to generalizing on the basis of similarity. Our results suggest that humans learn about the physical features of the stimuli alongside relational rules, and that rule- and similarity-based learning can interact in determining generalization. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T20:06:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f978d4f184ec47afadda686c744f4f1f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T20:06:30Z |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-f978d4f184ec47afadda686c744f4f1f2022-12-22T00:52:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01139e020380510.1371/journal.pone.0203805Rule-based generalization and peak shift in the presence of simple relational rules.Jessica C LeeEvan J LiveseyAfter discrimination learning between two stimuli that lie on a continuum, animals typically exhibit generalization on the basis of similarity to the physical features of the stimuli, often producing a peak-shifted gradient. However, post-discrimination generalization in humans usually resembles a monotonically increasing (e.g., linear) gradient that is better characterized as following a relational rule describing the difference between the stimuli. The current study tested whether rule-based generalization could be disrupted by reducing the applicability of a relational rule on test. We compared generalization following a difficult categorization task between a group who could use their rule consistently throughout test (Group Consistent), and a group who could only apply their rule effectively on 50% of test trials and thus could only use it inconsistently (Group Inconsistent). Across two experiments, a peak shift was found in the Inconsistent group and a monotonic gradient in the Consistent group. A post-hoc sequential analysis revealed that the Inconsistent group produced both peak-shifted and monotonic gradients as a function of whether or not the relevant rule was applicable on the previous trial. Reducing the applicability of a rule on test thus appeared to lead participants to revert to generalizing on the basis of similarity. Our results suggest that humans learn about the physical features of the stimuli alongside relational rules, and that rule- and similarity-based learning can interact in determining generalization.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6157829?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Jessica C Lee Evan J Livesey Rule-based generalization and peak shift in the presence of simple relational rules. PLoS ONE |
| title | Rule-based generalization and peak shift in the presence of simple relational rules. |
| title_full | Rule-based generalization and peak shift in the presence of simple relational rules. |
| title_fullStr | Rule-based generalization and peak shift in the presence of simple relational rules. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rule-based generalization and peak shift in the presence of simple relational rules. |
| title_short | Rule-based generalization and peak shift in the presence of simple relational rules. |
| title_sort | rule based generalization and peak shift in the presence of simple relational rules |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6157829?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jessicaclee rulebasedgeneralizationandpeakshiftinthepresenceofsimplerelationalrules AT evanjlivesey rulebasedgeneralizationandpeakshiftinthepresenceofsimplerelationalrules |