Comparison of Tibial Bone Coverage of 6 Knee Prostheses: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study with Controlled Rotation

Purpose. To compare the extent of tibial bone covered by the tibial tray in 6 most commonly used total knee arthroplasty designs in order to strike a balance between mediolateral cortical fit and optimal tibial component rotation. Methods. In 74 men and 27 women aged 17 to 60 (mean, 32) years with s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gregory C Wernecke, Ian A Harris, Michael TW Houang, Bradley G Seeto, Darren B Chen, Samuel J MacDessi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901202000201
Description
Summary:Purpose. To compare the extent of tibial bone covered by the tibial tray in 6 most commonly used total knee arthroplasty designs in order to strike a balance between mediolateral cortical fit and optimal tibial component rotation. Methods. In 74 men and 27 women aged 17 to 60 (mean, 32) years with suspected soft-tissue injuries, their magnetic resonance images of the knee in full extension were superimposed with scans of the tibial trays of the 6 designs (one asymmetric and 5 symmetric). The tibial coverage by the tray and any posterolateral/posteromedial overhang/underhang were measured. Results. All 6 tray designs achieved tibial bone coverage of over 80%. Only 28% of all trays achieved optimal posterolateral fit, whereas 49% had posterolateral overhang enough to cause popliteal tendon impingement. Although the asymmetric tray provided highest tibial coverage (88%), its rates of relative and absolute posterolateral and posteromedial overhang were also highest (64%). Conclusion. The asymmetric tray provided improved tibial coverage at the expense of posterolateral and posteromedial overhang of the tibial tray.
ISSN:2309-4990