Mycobacterium ulcerans not detected by PCR on human skin in Buruli ulcer endemic areas of south eastern Australia.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Mycobacterium ulcerans (MU) causes Buruli ulcer (Buruli), a geographically restricted infection that can result in skin loss, contracture and permanent scarring. Lesion-location maps compiled from more than 640 cases in south eastern Australia suggest biting insects...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anita Velink, Jessica L Porter, Timothy P Stinear, Paul D R Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-10-01
Series:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011272&type=printable
_version_ 1797647793790124032
author Anita Velink
Jessica L Porter
Timothy P Stinear
Paul D R Johnson
author_facet Anita Velink
Jessica L Porter
Timothy P Stinear
Paul D R Johnson
author_sort Anita Velink
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Mycobacterium ulcerans (MU) causes Buruli ulcer (Buruli), a geographically restricted infection that can result in skin loss, contracture and permanent scarring. Lesion-location maps compiled from more than 640 cases in south eastern Australia suggest biting insects are likely involved in transmission, but it is unclear whether MU is brought by insects to humans or if MU is already on the skin and inoculation is an opportunistic event that need not be insect dependent.<h4>Methods</h4>We validated a PCR swab detection assay and defined its dynamic range using laboratory cultured M. ulcerans and fresh pigskin. We invited volunteers in Buruli-endemic and non-endemic areas to sample their skin surfaces with self-collected skin swabs tested by IS2404 quantitative PCR.<h4>Results</h4>Pigskin validation experiments established a limit-of-detection of 0.06 CFU/cm2 at a qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) of 35. Fifty-seven volunteers returned their self-collected kits of 4 swabs (bilateral ankles, calves, wrists, forearms), 10 from control areas and 47 from endemic areas. Collection was timed to coincide with the known peak-transmission period of Buruli. All swabs from human volunteers tested negative (Ct ≥35).<h4>Conclusions</h4>M. ulcerans was not detected on the skin of humans from highly Buruli endemic areas.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:21:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f987cce5ff6343fe829e7f3f4e7674dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1935-2727
1935-2735
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:21:39Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
spelling doaj.art-f987cce5ff6343fe829e7f3f4e7674dd2023-10-28T05:32:11ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27271935-27352023-10-011710e001127210.1371/journal.pntd.0011272Mycobacterium ulcerans not detected by PCR on human skin in Buruli ulcer endemic areas of south eastern Australia.Anita VelinkJessica L PorterTimothy P StinearPaul D R Johnson<h4>Introduction</h4>Mycobacterium ulcerans (MU) causes Buruli ulcer (Buruli), a geographically restricted infection that can result in skin loss, contracture and permanent scarring. Lesion-location maps compiled from more than 640 cases in south eastern Australia suggest biting insects are likely involved in transmission, but it is unclear whether MU is brought by insects to humans or if MU is already on the skin and inoculation is an opportunistic event that need not be insect dependent.<h4>Methods</h4>We validated a PCR swab detection assay and defined its dynamic range using laboratory cultured M. ulcerans and fresh pigskin. We invited volunteers in Buruli-endemic and non-endemic areas to sample their skin surfaces with self-collected skin swabs tested by IS2404 quantitative PCR.<h4>Results</h4>Pigskin validation experiments established a limit-of-detection of 0.06 CFU/cm2 at a qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) of 35. Fifty-seven volunteers returned their self-collected kits of 4 swabs (bilateral ankles, calves, wrists, forearms), 10 from control areas and 47 from endemic areas. Collection was timed to coincide with the known peak-transmission period of Buruli. All swabs from human volunteers tested negative (Ct ≥35).<h4>Conclusions</h4>M. ulcerans was not detected on the skin of humans from highly Buruli endemic areas.https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011272&type=printable
spellingShingle Anita Velink
Jessica L Porter
Timothy P Stinear
Paul D R Johnson
Mycobacterium ulcerans not detected by PCR on human skin in Buruli ulcer endemic areas of south eastern Australia.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
title Mycobacterium ulcerans not detected by PCR on human skin in Buruli ulcer endemic areas of south eastern Australia.
title_full Mycobacterium ulcerans not detected by PCR on human skin in Buruli ulcer endemic areas of south eastern Australia.
title_fullStr Mycobacterium ulcerans not detected by PCR on human skin in Buruli ulcer endemic areas of south eastern Australia.
title_full_unstemmed Mycobacterium ulcerans not detected by PCR on human skin in Buruli ulcer endemic areas of south eastern Australia.
title_short Mycobacterium ulcerans not detected by PCR on human skin in Buruli ulcer endemic areas of south eastern Australia.
title_sort mycobacterium ulcerans not detected by pcr on human skin in buruli ulcer endemic areas of south eastern australia
url https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011272&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT anitavelink mycobacteriumulceransnotdetectedbypcronhumanskininburuliulcerendemicareasofsoutheasternaustralia
AT jessicalporter mycobacteriumulceransnotdetectedbypcronhumanskininburuliulcerendemicareasofsoutheasternaustralia
AT timothypstinear mycobacteriumulceransnotdetectedbypcronhumanskininburuliulcerendemicareasofsoutheasternaustralia
AT pauldrjohnson mycobacteriumulceransnotdetectedbypcronhumanskininburuliulcerendemicareasofsoutheasternaustralia