Notes on the Manuscrito de Palacio II-1520, marginal additions and philological controversies

After reviewing the development of the scholarly perceptions about the authorship of La Celestina in the last years, this article focuses on the subsets Mp-a and Mp-b of the Manuscrito de Palacio, particularly on the first one and some textual modifications of the second copyst. It states that they...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernando Cantalapiedra Erostarbe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Valencia, Departamento de Filología Española 2021-01-01
Series:Celestinesca
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/celestinesca/article/view/20190
Description
Summary:After reviewing the development of the scholarly perceptions about the authorship of La Celestina in the last years, this article focuses on the subsets Mp-a and Mp-b of the Manuscrito de Palacio, particularly on the first one and some textual modifications of the second copyst. It states that they stem from different models and that the marginal glosses are in fact additions by the second copyst which end up in the printed text. This process was applied to the twelve acts that formed the primitive Terentian comedy. It also suggests some solutions for the loci critici «Minerva», «el can», «el cuchillo» and «huevos cocidos».
ISSN:0147-3085
2695-7183