The court procedure enacted by Dusan's code: Evidence and position of the defendant

This paper deals with the provisions on the judicial proceedings of medieval Serbia enacted in Dusan's Code. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview and analysis of the irrational and rational evidence of that period, as well as to point to the position of the defendant, bearing in mind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mirkov Željko D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law 2018-01-01
Series:Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2018/0550-21791803283M.pdf
_version_ 1818574700816629760
author Mirkov Željko D.
author_facet Mirkov Željko D.
author_sort Mirkov Željko D.
collection DOAJ
description This paper deals with the provisions on the judicial proceedings of medieval Serbia enacted in Dusan's Code. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview and analysis of the irrational and rational evidence of that period, as well as to point to the position of the defendant, bearing in mind this system of evidence. The judicial proceedings in Dusan's Code were predominantly organized in accordance with the rules of the indictment principle, however, what can also be observed is the onset of the understanding that the violation of certain norms is not only an issue of an individual. As a rule, the decision to initiate the judicial proceedings was dependant on the will of the injured party, and only exceptionally, in the event that the offense violated the public interest, the proceedings were initiated ex officio. In the sphere of evidence, it is possible to differentiate between irrational and rational evidence. The oath, the jury and the divine courts are considered to be the irrational evidence of this period. Among the rational evidence in Serbian medieval law, there is mention of 'obličenije' (capture of the offender in the act); 'svod', which the defendant used to prove that he did not steal the object of the crime, but that he came into possession of said object through someone else; including witnesses, documents and confessions. The existence of rational evidence meant proof of the defendant's guilt, in which case the irrational evidence was not presented. It was the absence of rational evidence that led to the presentation of irrational evidence, which means that irrational evidence was subsidiary in relation to rational evidence. If the defendant's guilt was proven by rational evidence, the strength of this evidence could not be mitigated by any type of irrational evidence, therefore it was not possible to cumulatively apply rational and irrational evidence. Some of the provisions of Dusan's Code give rise to the division of social classes, which was their characteristic: different social classes used different evidence to justify the same criminal offense, and the type and severity of the imposed criminal sanction was dependant on the social class to which the defendant belonged. During the proceedings, the defendant took an oath, which, given the influence of religion on the lives of people at that time, could have influenced him to tell the truth during the proceedings. After the hearing, the defendant could not alter his original testimony, and during the proceedings he was obliged to adhere to the case in dispute and could not blame the injured party for another criminal offense.
first_indexed 2024-12-15T00:30:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f988f66ccfc240bbbea416ae95dbe748
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0550-2179
2406-1255
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-15T00:30:02Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law
record_format Article
series Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
spelling doaj.art-f988f66ccfc240bbbea416ae95dbe7482022-12-21T22:42:03ZengUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of LawZbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu0550-21792406-12552018-01-01523128312960550-21791803283MThe court procedure enacted by Dusan's code: Evidence and position of the defendantMirkov Željko D.0Osnovno javno tužilaštvo Kikinda, KikindaThis paper deals with the provisions on the judicial proceedings of medieval Serbia enacted in Dusan's Code. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview and analysis of the irrational and rational evidence of that period, as well as to point to the position of the defendant, bearing in mind this system of evidence. The judicial proceedings in Dusan's Code were predominantly organized in accordance with the rules of the indictment principle, however, what can also be observed is the onset of the understanding that the violation of certain norms is not only an issue of an individual. As a rule, the decision to initiate the judicial proceedings was dependant on the will of the injured party, and only exceptionally, in the event that the offense violated the public interest, the proceedings were initiated ex officio. In the sphere of evidence, it is possible to differentiate between irrational and rational evidence. The oath, the jury and the divine courts are considered to be the irrational evidence of this period. Among the rational evidence in Serbian medieval law, there is mention of 'obličenije' (capture of the offender in the act); 'svod', which the defendant used to prove that he did not steal the object of the crime, but that he came into possession of said object through someone else; including witnesses, documents and confessions. The existence of rational evidence meant proof of the defendant's guilt, in which case the irrational evidence was not presented. It was the absence of rational evidence that led to the presentation of irrational evidence, which means that irrational evidence was subsidiary in relation to rational evidence. If the defendant's guilt was proven by rational evidence, the strength of this evidence could not be mitigated by any type of irrational evidence, therefore it was not possible to cumulatively apply rational and irrational evidence. Some of the provisions of Dusan's Code give rise to the division of social classes, which was their characteristic: different social classes used different evidence to justify the same criminal offense, and the type and severity of the imposed criminal sanction was dependant on the social class to which the defendant belonged. During the proceedings, the defendant took an oath, which, given the influence of religion on the lives of people at that time, could have influenced him to tell the truth during the proceedings. After the hearing, the defendant could not alter his original testimony, and during the proceedings he was obliged to adhere to the case in dispute and could not blame the injured party for another criminal offense.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2018/0550-21791803283M.pdfcourt procedureDusan's Codeevidencedefendant
spellingShingle Mirkov Željko D.
The court procedure enacted by Dusan's code: Evidence and position of the defendant
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
court procedure
Dusan's Code
evidence
defendant
title The court procedure enacted by Dusan's code: Evidence and position of the defendant
title_full The court procedure enacted by Dusan's code: Evidence and position of the defendant
title_fullStr The court procedure enacted by Dusan's code: Evidence and position of the defendant
title_full_unstemmed The court procedure enacted by Dusan's code: Evidence and position of the defendant
title_short The court procedure enacted by Dusan's code: Evidence and position of the defendant
title_sort court procedure enacted by dusan s code evidence and position of the defendant
topic court procedure
Dusan's Code
evidence
defendant
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2018/0550-21791803283M.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mirkovzeljkod thecourtprocedureenactedbydusanscodeevidenceandpositionofthedefendant
AT mirkovzeljkod courtprocedureenactedbydusanscodeevidenceandpositionofthedefendant