The tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causality

Abstract Previous research proposed that cognitive biases contribute to produce and maintain the symptoms exhibited by deluded patients. Specifically, the tendency to jump to conclusions (i.e., to stop collecting evidence soon before making a decision) has been claimed to contribute to delusion form...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María Manuela Moreno-Fernández, Fernando Blanco, Helena Matute
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82075-w
_version_ 1818683804783476736
author María Manuela Moreno-Fernández
Fernando Blanco
Helena Matute
author_facet María Manuela Moreno-Fernández
Fernando Blanco
Helena Matute
author_sort María Manuela Moreno-Fernández
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Previous research proposed that cognitive biases contribute to produce and maintain the symptoms exhibited by deluded patients. Specifically, the tendency to jump to conclusions (i.e., to stop collecting evidence soon before making a decision) has been claimed to contribute to delusion formation. Additionally, deluded patients show an abnormal understanding of cause-effect relationships, often leading to causal illusions (i.e., the belief that two events are causally connected, when they are not). Both types of bias appear in psychotic disorders, but also in healthy individuals. In two studies, we test the hypothesis that the two biases (jumping to conclusions and causal illusions) appear in the general population and correlate with each other. The rationale is based on current theories of associative learning that explain causal illusions as the result of a learning bias that tends to wear off as additional information is incorporated. We propose that participants with higher tendency to jump to conclusions will stop collecting information sooner in a causal learning study than those participants with lower tendency to jump to conclusions, which means that the former will not reach the learning asymptote, leading to biased judgments. The studies provide evidence in favour that the two biases are correlated but suggest that the proposed mechanism is not responsible for this association.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T10:40:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f9b395cf248e4d0e874e5b4539b0d8c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T10:40:34Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-f9b395cf248e4d0e874e5b4539b0d8c02022-12-21T21:52:16ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-02-0111111510.1038/s41598-021-82075-wThe tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causalityMaría Manuela Moreno-Fernández0Fernando Blanco1Helena Matute2Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of GranadaDepartment of Methods and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of DeustoDepartment of Methods and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of DeustoAbstract Previous research proposed that cognitive biases contribute to produce and maintain the symptoms exhibited by deluded patients. Specifically, the tendency to jump to conclusions (i.e., to stop collecting evidence soon before making a decision) has been claimed to contribute to delusion formation. Additionally, deluded patients show an abnormal understanding of cause-effect relationships, often leading to causal illusions (i.e., the belief that two events are causally connected, when they are not). Both types of bias appear in psychotic disorders, but also in healthy individuals. In two studies, we test the hypothesis that the two biases (jumping to conclusions and causal illusions) appear in the general population and correlate with each other. The rationale is based on current theories of associative learning that explain causal illusions as the result of a learning bias that tends to wear off as additional information is incorporated. We propose that participants with higher tendency to jump to conclusions will stop collecting information sooner in a causal learning study than those participants with lower tendency to jump to conclusions, which means that the former will not reach the learning asymptote, leading to biased judgments. The studies provide evidence in favour that the two biases are correlated but suggest that the proposed mechanism is not responsible for this association.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82075-w
spellingShingle María Manuela Moreno-Fernández
Fernando Blanco
Helena Matute
The tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causality
Scientific Reports
title The tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causality
title_full The tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causality
title_fullStr The tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causality
title_full_unstemmed The tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causality
title_short The tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causality
title_sort tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causality
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82075-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mariamanuelamorenofernandez thetendencytostopcollectinginformationislinkedtoillusionsofcausality
AT fernandoblanco thetendencytostopcollectinginformationislinkedtoillusionsofcausality
AT helenamatute thetendencytostopcollectinginformationislinkedtoillusionsofcausality
AT mariamanuelamorenofernandez tendencytostopcollectinginformationislinkedtoillusionsofcausality
AT fernandoblanco tendencytostopcollectinginformationislinkedtoillusionsofcausality
AT helenamatute tendencytostopcollectinginformationislinkedtoillusionsofcausality