AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancer

Abstract The Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) guides treatment decisions in breast cancer but suffers from poor inter-rater reproducibility. Although AI tools have been designed for Ki-67 assessment, their impact on pathologists' work remains understudied. 90 international pathologists were recru...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda Dy, Ngoc-Nhu Jennifer Nguyen, Julien Meyer, Melanie Dawe, Wei Shi, Dimitri Androutsos, Anthony Fyles, Fei-Fei Liu, Susan Done, April Khademi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2024-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51723-2
_version_ 1827382311046348800
author Amanda Dy
Ngoc-Nhu Jennifer Nguyen
Julien Meyer
Melanie Dawe
Wei Shi
Dimitri Androutsos
Anthony Fyles
Fei-Fei Liu
Susan Done
April Khademi
author_facet Amanda Dy
Ngoc-Nhu Jennifer Nguyen
Julien Meyer
Melanie Dawe
Wei Shi
Dimitri Androutsos
Anthony Fyles
Fei-Fei Liu
Susan Done
April Khademi
author_sort Amanda Dy
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) guides treatment decisions in breast cancer but suffers from poor inter-rater reproducibility. Although AI tools have been designed for Ki-67 assessment, their impact on pathologists' work remains understudied. 90 international pathologists were recruited to assess the Ki-67 PI of ten breast cancer tissue microarrays with and without AI. Accuracy, agreement, and turnaround time with and without AI were compared. Pathologists’ perspectives on AI were collected. Using AI led to a significant decrease in PI error (2.1% with AI vs. 5.9% without AI, p < 0.001), better inter-rater agreement (ICC: 0.70 vs. 0.92; Krippendorff’s α: 0.63 vs. 0.89; Fleiss’ Kappa: 0.40 vs. 0.86), and an 11.9% overall median reduction in turnaround time. Most pathologists (84%) found the AI reliable. For Ki-67 assessments, 76% of respondents believed AI enhances accuracy, 82% said it improves consistency, and 83% trust it will improve efficiency. This study highlights AI's potential to standardize Ki-67 scoring, especially between 5 and 30% PI—a range with low PI agreement. This could pave the way for a universally accepted PI score to guide treatment decisions, emphasizing the promising role of AI integration into pathologist workflows.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T14:17:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f9b9e47961d24ef08c73f4a58d8c88d8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T14:17:45Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-f9b9e47961d24ef08c73f4a58d8c88d82024-01-14T12:21:03ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222024-01-0114111210.1038/s41598-024-51723-2AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancerAmanda Dy0Ngoc-Nhu Jennifer Nguyen1Julien Meyer2Melanie Dawe3Wei Shi4Dimitri Androutsos5Anthony Fyles6Fei-Fei Liu7Susan Done8April Khademi9Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan UniversityDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of TorontoSchool of Health Services Management, Toronto Metropolitan UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkElectrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health NetworkElectrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan UniversityAbstract The Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) guides treatment decisions in breast cancer but suffers from poor inter-rater reproducibility. Although AI tools have been designed for Ki-67 assessment, their impact on pathologists' work remains understudied. 90 international pathologists were recruited to assess the Ki-67 PI of ten breast cancer tissue microarrays with and without AI. Accuracy, agreement, and turnaround time with and without AI were compared. Pathologists’ perspectives on AI were collected. Using AI led to a significant decrease in PI error (2.1% with AI vs. 5.9% without AI, p < 0.001), better inter-rater agreement (ICC: 0.70 vs. 0.92; Krippendorff’s α: 0.63 vs. 0.89; Fleiss’ Kappa: 0.40 vs. 0.86), and an 11.9% overall median reduction in turnaround time. Most pathologists (84%) found the AI reliable. For Ki-67 assessments, 76% of respondents believed AI enhances accuracy, 82% said it improves consistency, and 83% trust it will improve efficiency. This study highlights AI's potential to standardize Ki-67 scoring, especially between 5 and 30% PI—a range with low PI agreement. This could pave the way for a universally accepted PI score to guide treatment decisions, emphasizing the promising role of AI integration into pathologist workflows.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51723-2
spellingShingle Amanda Dy
Ngoc-Nhu Jennifer Nguyen
Julien Meyer
Melanie Dawe
Wei Shi
Dimitri Androutsos
Anthony Fyles
Fei-Fei Liu
Susan Done
April Khademi
AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancer
Scientific Reports
title AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancer
title_full AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancer
title_fullStr AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancer
title_short AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancer
title_sort ai improves accuracy agreement and efficiency of pathologists for ki67 assessments in breast cancer
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51723-2
work_keys_str_mv AT amandady aiimprovesaccuracyagreementandefficiencyofpathologistsforki67assessmentsinbreastcancer
AT ngocnhujennifernguyen aiimprovesaccuracyagreementandefficiencyofpathologistsforki67assessmentsinbreastcancer
AT julienmeyer aiimprovesaccuracyagreementandefficiencyofpathologistsforki67assessmentsinbreastcancer
AT melaniedawe aiimprovesaccuracyagreementandefficiencyofpathologistsforki67assessmentsinbreastcancer
AT weishi aiimprovesaccuracyagreementandefficiencyofpathologistsforki67assessmentsinbreastcancer
AT dimitriandroutsos aiimprovesaccuracyagreementandefficiencyofpathologistsforki67assessmentsinbreastcancer
AT anthonyfyles aiimprovesaccuracyagreementandefficiencyofpathologistsforki67assessmentsinbreastcancer
AT feifeiliu aiimprovesaccuracyagreementandefficiencyofpathologistsforki67assessmentsinbreastcancer
AT susandone aiimprovesaccuracyagreementandefficiencyofpathologistsforki67assessmentsinbreastcancer
AT aprilkhademi aiimprovesaccuracyagreementandefficiencyofpathologistsforki67assessmentsinbreastcancer