Water-stress-induced breakdown of carbon–water relations: indicators from diurnal FLUXNET patterns

Understanding of terrestrial carbon and water cycles is currently hampered by an uncertainty in how to capture the large variety of plant responses to drought. In FLUXNET, the global network of CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O flux observations, many sites do not uniform...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. A. Nelson, N. Carvalhais, M. Migliavacca, M. Reichstein, M. Jung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-04-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/2433/2018/bg-15-2433-2018.pdf
_version_ 1819194983251443712
author J. A. Nelson
N. Carvalhais
N. Carvalhais
M. Migliavacca
M. Reichstein
M. Reichstein
M. Jung
author_facet J. A. Nelson
N. Carvalhais
N. Carvalhais
M. Migliavacca
M. Reichstein
M. Reichstein
M. Jung
author_sort J. A. Nelson
collection DOAJ
description Understanding of terrestrial carbon and water cycles is currently hampered by an uncertainty in how to capture the large variety of plant responses to drought. In FLUXNET, the global network of CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O flux observations, many sites do not uniformly report the ancillary variables needed to study drought response physiology. To this end, we outline two data-driven indicators based on diurnal energy, water, and carbon flux patterns derived directly from the eddy covariance data and based on theorized physiological responses to hydraulic and non-stomatal limitations. Hydraulic limitations (i.e. intra-plant limitations on water movement) are proxied using the relative diurnal centroid (<i>C</i><sub>ET</sub>*), which measures the degree to which the flux of evapotranspiration (ET) is shifted toward the morning. Non-stomatal limitations (e.g. inhibitions of biochemical reactions, RuBisCO activity, and/or mesophyll conductance) are characterized by the Diurnal Water–Carbon Index (DWCI), which measures the degree of coupling between ET and gross primary productivity (GPP) within each day. As a proof of concept we show the response of the metrics at six European sites during the 2003 heat wave event, showing a varied response of morning shifts and decoupling. Globally, we found indications of hydraulic limitations in the form of significantly high frequencies of morning-shifted days in dry/Mediterranean climates and savanna/evergreen plant functional types (PFTs), whereas high frequencies of decoupling were dominated by dry climates and grassland/savanna PFTs indicating a prevalence of non-stomatal limitations in these ecosystems. Overall, both the diurnal centroid and DWCI were associated with high net radiation and low latent energy typical of drought. Using three water use efficiency (WUE) models, we found the mean differences between expected and observed WUE to be −0.09 to 0.44 µmol mmol<sup>−1</sup> and −0.29 to −0.40 µmol mmol<sup>−1</sup> for decoupled and morning-shifted days, respectively, compared to mean differences −1.41 to −1.42 µmol mmol<sup>−1</sup> in dry conditions, suggesting that morning shifts/hydraulic responses are associated with an increase in WUE, whereas decoupling/non-stomatal limitations are not.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T02:05:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f9d2c62be63e4a108844cbe2a06fe026
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T02:05:32Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Biogeosciences
spelling doaj.art-f9d2c62be63e4a108844cbe2a06fe0262022-12-21T18:03:53ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892018-04-01152433244710.5194/bg-15-2433-2018Water-stress-induced breakdown of carbon–water relations: indicators from diurnal FLUXNET patternsJ. A. Nelson0N. Carvalhais1N. Carvalhais2M. Migliavacca3M. Reichstein4M. Reichstein5M. Jung6Department of Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, GermanyDepartment of Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, GermanyFaculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, FCT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, PortugalDepartment of Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, GermanyDepartment of Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, GermanyMichael Stifel Center Jena for Data-Driven and Simulation Science, Jena, GermanyDepartment of Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, GermanyUnderstanding of terrestrial carbon and water cycles is currently hampered by an uncertainty in how to capture the large variety of plant responses to drought. In FLUXNET, the global network of CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O flux observations, many sites do not uniformly report the ancillary variables needed to study drought response physiology. To this end, we outline two data-driven indicators based on diurnal energy, water, and carbon flux patterns derived directly from the eddy covariance data and based on theorized physiological responses to hydraulic and non-stomatal limitations. Hydraulic limitations (i.e. intra-plant limitations on water movement) are proxied using the relative diurnal centroid (<i>C</i><sub>ET</sub>*), which measures the degree to which the flux of evapotranspiration (ET) is shifted toward the morning. Non-stomatal limitations (e.g. inhibitions of biochemical reactions, RuBisCO activity, and/or mesophyll conductance) are characterized by the Diurnal Water–Carbon Index (DWCI), which measures the degree of coupling between ET and gross primary productivity (GPP) within each day. As a proof of concept we show the response of the metrics at six European sites during the 2003 heat wave event, showing a varied response of morning shifts and decoupling. Globally, we found indications of hydraulic limitations in the form of significantly high frequencies of morning-shifted days in dry/Mediterranean climates and savanna/evergreen plant functional types (PFTs), whereas high frequencies of decoupling were dominated by dry climates and grassland/savanna PFTs indicating a prevalence of non-stomatal limitations in these ecosystems. Overall, both the diurnal centroid and DWCI were associated with high net radiation and low latent energy typical of drought. Using three water use efficiency (WUE) models, we found the mean differences between expected and observed WUE to be −0.09 to 0.44 µmol mmol<sup>−1</sup> and −0.29 to −0.40 µmol mmol<sup>−1</sup> for decoupled and morning-shifted days, respectively, compared to mean differences −1.41 to −1.42 µmol mmol<sup>−1</sup> in dry conditions, suggesting that morning shifts/hydraulic responses are associated with an increase in WUE, whereas decoupling/non-stomatal limitations are not.https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/2433/2018/bg-15-2433-2018.pdf
spellingShingle J. A. Nelson
N. Carvalhais
N. Carvalhais
M. Migliavacca
M. Reichstein
M. Reichstein
M. Jung
Water-stress-induced breakdown of carbon–water relations: indicators from diurnal FLUXNET patterns
Biogeosciences
title Water-stress-induced breakdown of carbon–water relations: indicators from diurnal FLUXNET patterns
title_full Water-stress-induced breakdown of carbon–water relations: indicators from diurnal FLUXNET patterns
title_fullStr Water-stress-induced breakdown of carbon–water relations: indicators from diurnal FLUXNET patterns
title_full_unstemmed Water-stress-induced breakdown of carbon–water relations: indicators from diurnal FLUXNET patterns
title_short Water-stress-induced breakdown of carbon–water relations: indicators from diurnal FLUXNET patterns
title_sort water stress induced breakdown of carbon water relations indicators from diurnal fluxnet patterns
url https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/2433/2018/bg-15-2433-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT janelson waterstressinducedbreakdownofcarbonwaterrelationsindicatorsfromdiurnalfluxnetpatterns
AT ncarvalhais waterstressinducedbreakdownofcarbonwaterrelationsindicatorsfromdiurnalfluxnetpatterns
AT ncarvalhais waterstressinducedbreakdownofcarbonwaterrelationsindicatorsfromdiurnalfluxnetpatterns
AT mmigliavacca waterstressinducedbreakdownofcarbonwaterrelationsindicatorsfromdiurnalfluxnetpatterns
AT mreichstein waterstressinducedbreakdownofcarbonwaterrelationsindicatorsfromdiurnalfluxnetpatterns
AT mreichstein waterstressinducedbreakdownofcarbonwaterrelationsindicatorsfromdiurnalfluxnetpatterns
AT mjung waterstressinducedbreakdownofcarbonwaterrelationsindicatorsfromdiurnalfluxnetpatterns