| Summary: | Ali Al Qarni,1– 3 Ahmad Habib,4 Elbadri Abdelgadir,1 Abdulaziz Al Sarawi,1,3 Naif Alqannas,5 Ammar Alkroud6 1Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia; 2King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia; 3King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia; 4Department of Medicine, King Fahd Military Medical Complex (KFMMC), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia; 5Saud Al Babtain Cardiac Centre, Eastern Health Cluster, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; 6Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare (JHAH), Al Ahsa, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Ali Al Qarni, Consultant Endocrinologist, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Po Box 2477, Al Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966500133678, Email qarniaa@ngha.med.sa; qarniaa@gmail.comBackground: Morning Report (MR) is a ubiquitous traditional educational activity in internal medicine residency training. It is under-researched; hence, this study was conducted. It aimed to examine the practice of MR by internal medicine residents, their motivation to engage with it, and their perception of its contribution to education.Methods: This was a multi-center cross-sectional study. The data was collected using an online self-administered 12-item questionnaire that covered MR practice, respondents’ motivation for participation, MR contribution to education, and its impact on the practice of evidence-based medicine and quality improvement and patient safety.Results: One hundred seventy residents returned the online questionnaire (54.7%). The respondents’ gender and year of training were balanced (P > 0.05). The most common MR frequency and duration were five days per week (85.4%) and 45– 60 minutes (47.1%), respectively. The most common format was handover combined with an emergency long case presentation (55.8%), and consultants were the most common facilitators (79.7%). The respondents’ motivation to engage with MR was predominantly intermediate. The top reasons for attending and not attending MR were mandatory attendance and embarrassing questions, respectively. The perceived MR contribution to residents’ different roles development was predominantly intermediate; however, it was predominantly very low/low (42%) for overall education. The perceived MR impact on the practice of EBM and QIPS were both predominantly intermediate.Conclusion: MR was found to be a commonly practiced educational activity in internal medicine residency training programs in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. The case discussion was the core format for education. The respondents’ motivation to participate in MR and their perception of its contribution to education was predominantly intermediate. To our best knowledge, this is the first study in Saudi Arabia that examined MR. We hope its findings will be taken for further MR studies and actions for improvement.Keywords: morning report, MR, internal medicine residency, contribution to education, residents’ role development
|
|---|