A cost comparison of open versus percutaneous approaches to management of large staghorn calculi
Aim: This paper compares the cost of open versus percutaneous approaches to the management of large staghorn calculi in a tertiary care hospital in India. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for staghorn calculi larger than 6 cm between January 1998 and December 2003 were included...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2008-01-01
|
| Series: | Indian Journal of Urology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2008;volume=24;issue=1;spage=28;epage=34;aulast=Sinha |
| _version_ | 1818906400752926720 |
|---|---|
| author | Maneesh Sinha K R John K N Chacko Ganesh Gopalakrishnan |
| author_facet | Maneesh Sinha K R John K N Chacko Ganesh Gopalakrishnan |
| author_sort | Maneesh Sinha |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim: This paper compares the cost of open versus percutaneous approaches to the management of large staghorn calculi in a tertiary care hospital in India.
Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for staghorn calculi larger than 6 cm between January 1998 and December 2003 were included. Those who had confounding factors in terms of cost such as additional surgical or medical procedures and complications unrelated to the surgery were excluded. The process of costing was done by following the clinical pathway.
Results: There were 13 patients who had open stone surgery and 19 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). The major differences in cost were seen in the higher cost of instruments and consumables in the PCNL group. The cost of management of complications widened this gap. Two patients in the PCNL group and none in the residual group required redo surgery. The residual stones in the open and PCNL groups required a mean of 2525 and 3623 shocks per patient respectively. Complete clearance after redo surgery and Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) was seen in 92% and 58% in the open and PCNL arms respectively. The overall cost per patient was $625 per PCNL and $499 per open surgery. The final mean residual stone size in the PCNL group was 4.84 mm whereas it was 0.38 mm in the open group. The effective cost of achieving complete clearance in one patient was $1078 in the PCNL group and $543 in the open group.
Conclusion: Open stone surgery is less costly than PCNL in large staghorn calculi. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T21:38:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f9d46758d9644c46a2d10e7107281330 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0970-1591 1998-3824 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T21:38:38Z |
| publishDate | 2008-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Indian Journal of Urology |
| spelling | doaj.art-f9d46758d9644c46a2d10e71072813302022-12-21T20:04:44ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15911998-38242008-01-01241283410.4103/0970-1591.38599A cost comparison of open versus percutaneous approaches to management of large staghorn calculiManeesh SinhaK R JohnK N ChackoGanesh GopalakrishnanAim: This paper compares the cost of open versus percutaneous approaches to the management of large staghorn calculi in a tertiary care hospital in India. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for staghorn calculi larger than 6 cm between January 1998 and December 2003 were included. Those who had confounding factors in terms of cost such as additional surgical or medical procedures and complications unrelated to the surgery were excluded. The process of costing was done by following the clinical pathway. Results: There were 13 patients who had open stone surgery and 19 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). The major differences in cost were seen in the higher cost of instruments and consumables in the PCNL group. The cost of management of complications widened this gap. Two patients in the PCNL group and none in the residual group required redo surgery. The residual stones in the open and PCNL groups required a mean of 2525 and 3623 shocks per patient respectively. Complete clearance after redo surgery and Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) was seen in 92% and 58% in the open and PCNL arms respectively. The overall cost per patient was $625 per PCNL and $499 per open surgery. The final mean residual stone size in the PCNL group was 4.84 mm whereas it was 0.38 mm in the open group. The effective cost of achieving complete clearance in one patient was $1078 in the PCNL group and $543 in the open group. Conclusion: Open stone surgery is less costly than PCNL in large staghorn calculi.http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2008;volume=24;issue=1;spage=28;epage=34;aulast=SinhaOpen surgerypercutaneous nephrolithotripsystaghorn calculi |
| spellingShingle | Maneesh Sinha K R John K N Chacko Ganesh Gopalakrishnan A cost comparison of open versus percutaneous approaches to management of large staghorn calculi Indian Journal of Urology Open surgery percutaneous nephrolithotripsy staghorn calculi |
| title | A cost comparison of open versus percutaneous approaches to management of large staghorn calculi |
| title_full | A cost comparison of open versus percutaneous approaches to management of large staghorn calculi |
| title_fullStr | A cost comparison of open versus percutaneous approaches to management of large staghorn calculi |
| title_full_unstemmed | A cost comparison of open versus percutaneous approaches to management of large staghorn calculi |
| title_short | A cost comparison of open versus percutaneous approaches to management of large staghorn calculi |
| title_sort | cost comparison of open versus percutaneous approaches to management of large staghorn calculi |
| topic | Open surgery percutaneous nephrolithotripsy staghorn calculi |
| url | http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2008;volume=24;issue=1;spage=28;epage=34;aulast=Sinha |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maneeshsinha acostcomparisonofopenversuspercutaneousapproachestomanagementoflargestaghorncalculi AT krjohn acostcomparisonofopenversuspercutaneousapproachestomanagementoflargestaghorncalculi AT knchacko acostcomparisonofopenversuspercutaneousapproachestomanagementoflargestaghorncalculi AT ganeshgopalakrishnan acostcomparisonofopenversuspercutaneousapproachestomanagementoflargestaghorncalculi AT maneeshsinha costcomparisonofopenversuspercutaneousapproachestomanagementoflargestaghorncalculi AT krjohn costcomparisonofopenversuspercutaneousapproachestomanagementoflargestaghorncalculi AT knchacko costcomparisonofopenversuspercutaneousapproachestomanagementoflargestaghorncalculi AT ganeshgopalakrishnan costcomparisonofopenversuspercutaneousapproachestomanagementoflargestaghorncalculi |