Revisiting Biological Nitrogen Fixation Dynamics in Soybeans

Biological nitrogen (N) fixation is the most relevant process in soybeans (Glycine max L.) to satisfy plant N demand and sustain seed protein formation. Past studies describing N fixation for field-grown soybeans mainly focused on a single point time measurement (mainly toward the end of the season)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ignacio A. Ciampitti, André Froes de Borja Reis, S. Carolina Córdova, Michael J. Castellano, Sotirios V. Archontoulis, Adrian A. Correndo, Luiz Felipe Antunes De Almeida, Luiz H. Moro Rosso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.727021/full
_version_ 1818689566338449408
author Ignacio A. Ciampitti
André Froes de Borja Reis
S. Carolina Córdova
S. Carolina Córdova
S. Carolina Córdova
Michael J. Castellano
Sotirios V. Archontoulis
Adrian A. Correndo
Luiz Felipe Antunes De Almeida
Luiz H. Moro Rosso
author_facet Ignacio A. Ciampitti
André Froes de Borja Reis
S. Carolina Córdova
S. Carolina Córdova
S. Carolina Córdova
Michael J. Castellano
Sotirios V. Archontoulis
Adrian A. Correndo
Luiz Felipe Antunes De Almeida
Luiz H. Moro Rosso
author_sort Ignacio A. Ciampitti
collection DOAJ
description Biological nitrogen (N) fixation is the most relevant process in soybeans (Glycine max L.) to satisfy plant N demand and sustain seed protein formation. Past studies describing N fixation for field-grown soybeans mainly focused on a single point time measurement (mainly toward the end of the season) and on the partial N budget (fixed-N minus seed N removal), overlooking the seasonal pattern of this process. Therefore, this study synthesized field datasets involving multiple temporal measurements during the crop growing season to characterize N fixation dynamics using both fixed-N (kg ha−1) and N derived from the atmosphere [Ndfa (%)] to define: (i) time to the maximum rate of N fixation (β2), (ii) time to the maximum Ndfa (α2), and (iii) the cumulative fixed-N. The main outcomes of this study are that (1) the maximum rate of N fixation was around the beginning of pod formation (R3 stage), (2) time to the maximum Ndfa (%) was after full pod formation (R4), and (3) cumulative fixation was positively associated with the seasonal vapor-pressure deficit (VPD) and growth cycle length but negatively associated with soil clay content, and (4) time to the maximum N fixation rate (β2) was positively impacted by season length and negatively impacted by high temperatures during vegetative growth (but positively for VPD, during the same period). Overall, variation in the timing of the maximum rate of N fixation occurred within a much narrower range of growth stages (R3) than the timing of the maximum Ndfa (%), which varied broadly from flowering (R1) to seed filing (R5–R6) depending on the evaluated studies. From a phenotyping standpoint, N fixation determinations after the R4 growth stage would most likely permit capturing both maximum fixed-N rate and maximum Ndfa (%). Further investigations that more closely screen the interplay between N fixation with soil-plant-environment factors should be pursued.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T12:12:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f9da3517e4964765b1fd51ec70e67b82
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-462X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T12:12:08Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Plant Science
spelling doaj.art-f9da3517e4964765b1fd51ec70e67b822022-12-21T21:49:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2021-10-011210.3389/fpls.2021.727021727021Revisiting Biological Nitrogen Fixation Dynamics in SoybeansIgnacio A. Ciampitti0André Froes de Borja Reis1S. Carolina Córdova2S. Carolina Córdova3S. Carolina Córdova4Michael J. Castellano5Sotirios V. Archontoulis6Adrian A. Correndo7Luiz Felipe Antunes De Almeida8Luiz H. Moro Rosso9Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United StatesDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United StatesGreat Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesW. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, United StatesDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United StatesDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United StatesDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United StatesDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United StatesDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United StatesBiological nitrogen (N) fixation is the most relevant process in soybeans (Glycine max L.) to satisfy plant N demand and sustain seed protein formation. Past studies describing N fixation for field-grown soybeans mainly focused on a single point time measurement (mainly toward the end of the season) and on the partial N budget (fixed-N minus seed N removal), overlooking the seasonal pattern of this process. Therefore, this study synthesized field datasets involving multiple temporal measurements during the crop growing season to characterize N fixation dynamics using both fixed-N (kg ha−1) and N derived from the atmosphere [Ndfa (%)] to define: (i) time to the maximum rate of N fixation (β2), (ii) time to the maximum Ndfa (α2), and (iii) the cumulative fixed-N. The main outcomes of this study are that (1) the maximum rate of N fixation was around the beginning of pod formation (R3 stage), (2) time to the maximum Ndfa (%) was after full pod formation (R4), and (3) cumulative fixation was positively associated with the seasonal vapor-pressure deficit (VPD) and growth cycle length but negatively associated with soil clay content, and (4) time to the maximum N fixation rate (β2) was positively impacted by season length and negatively impacted by high temperatures during vegetative growth (but positively for VPD, during the same period). Overall, variation in the timing of the maximum rate of N fixation occurred within a much narrower range of growth stages (R3) than the timing of the maximum Ndfa (%), which varied broadly from flowering (R1) to seed filing (R5–R6) depending on the evaluated studies. From a phenotyping standpoint, N fixation determinations after the R4 growth stage would most likely permit capturing both maximum fixed-N rate and maximum Ndfa (%). Further investigations that more closely screen the interplay between N fixation with soil-plant-environment factors should be pursued.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.727021/fullsoybeansbiological N fixationsoilweatherN derived from the atmosphere
spellingShingle Ignacio A. Ciampitti
André Froes de Borja Reis
S. Carolina Córdova
S. Carolina Córdova
S. Carolina Córdova
Michael J. Castellano
Sotirios V. Archontoulis
Adrian A. Correndo
Luiz Felipe Antunes De Almeida
Luiz H. Moro Rosso
Revisiting Biological Nitrogen Fixation Dynamics in Soybeans
Frontiers in Plant Science
soybeans
biological N fixation
soil
weather
N derived from the atmosphere
title Revisiting Biological Nitrogen Fixation Dynamics in Soybeans
title_full Revisiting Biological Nitrogen Fixation Dynamics in Soybeans
title_fullStr Revisiting Biological Nitrogen Fixation Dynamics in Soybeans
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting Biological Nitrogen Fixation Dynamics in Soybeans
title_short Revisiting Biological Nitrogen Fixation Dynamics in Soybeans
title_sort revisiting biological nitrogen fixation dynamics in soybeans
topic soybeans
biological N fixation
soil
weather
N derived from the atmosphere
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.727021/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ignacioaciampitti revisitingbiologicalnitrogenfixationdynamicsinsoybeans
AT andrefroesdeborjareis revisitingbiologicalnitrogenfixationdynamicsinsoybeans
AT scarolinacordova revisitingbiologicalnitrogenfixationdynamicsinsoybeans
AT scarolinacordova revisitingbiologicalnitrogenfixationdynamicsinsoybeans
AT scarolinacordova revisitingbiologicalnitrogenfixationdynamicsinsoybeans
AT michaeljcastellano revisitingbiologicalnitrogenfixationdynamicsinsoybeans
AT sotiriosvarchontoulis revisitingbiologicalnitrogenfixationdynamicsinsoybeans
AT adrianacorrendo revisitingbiologicalnitrogenfixationdynamicsinsoybeans
AT luizfelipeantunesdealmeida revisitingbiologicalnitrogenfixationdynamicsinsoybeans
AT luizhmororosso revisitingbiologicalnitrogenfixationdynamicsinsoybeans