Comparative Analysis of P2P Architectures for Energy Trading and Sharing
Rising awareness and emergence of smart technologies have inspired new thinking in energy system management. Whilst integration of distributed energy resources in micro-grids (MGs) has become the technique of choice for consumers to generate their energy, it also provides a unique opportunity to exp...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | Energies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/62 |
| _version_ | 1811307343680372736 |
|---|---|
| author | Olamide Jogunola Augustine Ikpehai Kelvin Anoh Bamidele Adebisi Mohammad Hammoudeh Haris Gacanin Georgina Harris |
| author_facet | Olamide Jogunola Augustine Ikpehai Kelvin Anoh Bamidele Adebisi Mohammad Hammoudeh Haris Gacanin Georgina Harris |
| author_sort | Olamide Jogunola |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Rising awareness and emergence of smart technologies have inspired new thinking in energy system management. Whilst integration of distributed energy resources in micro-grids (MGs) has become the technique of choice for consumers to generate their energy, it also provides a unique opportunity to explore energy trading and sharing amongst them. This paper investigates peer-to-peer (P2P) communication architectures for prosumers’ energy trading and sharing. The performances of common P2P protocols are evaluated under the stringent communication requirements of energy networks defined in IEEE 1547.3-2007. Simulation results show that the structured P2P protocol exhibits a reliability of 99.997% in peer discovery and message delivery whilst the unstructured P2P protocol yields 98%, both of which are consistent with the requirements of MG applications. These two architectures exhibit high scalability with a latency of 0.5 s at a relatively low bandwidth consumption, thus, showing promising potential in their adoption for prosumer to prosumer communication. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T09:01:40Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f9df7325e7714c0e8ffb5ccce24a546e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1996-1073 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T09:01:40Z |
| publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energies |
| spelling | doaj.art-f9df7325e7714c0e8ffb5ccce24a546e2022-12-22T02:53:07ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732017-12-011116210.3390/en11010062en11010062Comparative Analysis of P2P Architectures for Energy Trading and SharingOlamide Jogunola0Augustine Ikpehai1Kelvin Anoh2Bamidele Adebisi3Mohammad Hammoudeh4Haris Gacanin5Georgina Harris6Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UKFaculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UKFaculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UKFaculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UKFaculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UKNokia-Bell Labs, Copernicuslaan 50, 2018 Antwerp, BelgiumFaculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UKRising awareness and emergence of smart technologies have inspired new thinking in energy system management. Whilst integration of distributed energy resources in micro-grids (MGs) has become the technique of choice for consumers to generate their energy, it also provides a unique opportunity to explore energy trading and sharing amongst them. This paper investigates peer-to-peer (P2P) communication architectures for prosumers’ energy trading and sharing. The performances of common P2P protocols are evaluated under the stringent communication requirements of energy networks defined in IEEE 1547.3-2007. Simulation results show that the structured P2P protocol exhibits a reliability of 99.997% in peer discovery and message delivery whilst the unstructured P2P protocol yields 98%, both of which are consistent with the requirements of MG applications. These two architectures exhibit high scalability with a latency of 0.5 s at a relatively low bandwidth consumption, thus, showing promising potential in their adoption for prosumer to prosumer communication.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/62peer-to-peer architecture (P2P)structured P2Punstructured P2Pprotocolsmicro-gridprosumerenergy trading and sharing (ETS)multi-agent systemskademliagia |
| spellingShingle | Olamide Jogunola Augustine Ikpehai Kelvin Anoh Bamidele Adebisi Mohammad Hammoudeh Haris Gacanin Georgina Harris Comparative Analysis of P2P Architectures for Energy Trading and Sharing Energies peer-to-peer architecture (P2P) structured P2P unstructured P2P protocols micro-grid prosumer energy trading and sharing (ETS) multi-agent systems kademlia gia |
| title | Comparative Analysis of P2P Architectures for Energy Trading and Sharing |
| title_full | Comparative Analysis of P2P Architectures for Energy Trading and Sharing |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of P2P Architectures for Energy Trading and Sharing |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of P2P Architectures for Energy Trading and Sharing |
| title_short | Comparative Analysis of P2P Architectures for Energy Trading and Sharing |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of p2p architectures for energy trading and sharing |
| topic | peer-to-peer architecture (P2P) structured P2P unstructured P2P protocols micro-grid prosumer energy trading and sharing (ETS) multi-agent systems kademlia gia |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/62 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT olamidejogunola comparativeanalysisofp2parchitecturesforenergytradingandsharing AT augustineikpehai comparativeanalysisofp2parchitecturesforenergytradingandsharing AT kelvinanoh comparativeanalysisofp2parchitecturesforenergytradingandsharing AT bamideleadebisi comparativeanalysisofp2parchitecturesforenergytradingandsharing AT mohammadhammoudeh comparativeanalysisofp2parchitecturesforenergytradingandsharing AT harisgacanin comparativeanalysisofp2parchitecturesforenergytradingandsharing AT georginaharris comparativeanalysisofp2parchitecturesforenergytradingandsharing |